Skip to main content
Log in

Synchronizing Diachronic Uncertainty

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diachronic uncertainty, uncertainty about where an agent falls in time, poses interesting conceptual difficulties. Although the agent is uncertain about where she falls in time, this uncertainty can only obtain at a particular moment in time. We resolve this conceptual tension by providing a transformation from models with diachronic uncertainty relations into “equivalent” models with only synchronic uncertainty relations. The former are interpreted as capturing the causal structure of a situation, while the latter are interpreted as capturing its epistemic structure. The models are equivalent in the sense that agents pass through the same information sets in the same order, In this paper, we investigate how such a transformation may be used to define an appropriate notion of equivalence, which we call epistemic equivalence. Although our project is motivated by problems which have arisen in a variety of disciplines, especially philosophy and game theory, our formal development takes place within the general and flexible framework provided by epistemic temporal logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aumann R., Hart S., Perry M. (1997) The forgetful passenger. Games and Economic Behavior 20: 117–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Z. (2006). Model checking for epistemic and temporal properties of uncertain agents. In Z. Shi & R. Sadananda (Eds.), PRIMA 2006 (pp. 46–58). LNAI 4088.

  • Elga A. (2000) Self-locating belief and the Sleeping Beauty problem. Analysis 60(2): 143–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagin R., Halpern J., Moses Y., Vardi M. (1995) Reasoning about knowledge. MIT Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson I., Reynolds M. (2006) Temporal logic. In: Blackburn P., Benthem J., Wolter F. (eds) Handbook of modal logic. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 655–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, H. W. (1953). Extensive games and the problem of information, reprinted from Contributions to the theory of games II. In H. W. Kuhn (Ed.), Classics in game theory (1997) (pp. 46–68).

  • Parikh, R., & Ramanujam R. (1985). Distributed processes and the logic of knowledge. In Logic of programs (Lecture notes in computer science 193) (pp. 256–268). London: Springer.

  • Piccione M., Rubinstein A. (1997) On the interpretation of decision problems with imperfect recall. Games and Economic Behavior 20: 3–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, F. B. (1952). Equivalence of games in extensive form, RAND Memo RM-759. In H. W. Kuhn (Ed.), Classics in game theory (1997) (pp. 36–45).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alistair Isaac.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Isaac, A., Hoshi, T. Synchronizing Diachronic Uncertainty. J of Log Lang and Inf 20, 137–159 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-010-9122-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-010-9122-9

Keywords

Navigation