Skip to main content
Log in

Reflections on mally’s heresy

  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. R. M. Chisholm, “Converse Intentional Properties,”Journal of Philosophy 79, 537–45.

  2. J.N. Findlay,Meinong’s Theory of Objects and Values, edited with an Introduction by D. Jacquette, from the second edition, Oxford University Press, London, Aldershot, Ashgate Publishing 1995 (Gregg revivals).

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Fine, Critical Review of Parsons’sNonexistent Objects, Philosophical Studies 45, 95–142.

  4. D. Jacquette, “Meinong’s Doctrine of the Modal Moment,”Grazer Philosophische Studien 35–36, 423–438.

  5. D. Jacquette, “Mally’s Heresy and the Logic of Meinong’s Object Theory,”History and Philosophy of Logic 10, 1–14.

  6. D. Jacquette, “Intentional Semantics and the Logic of Fiction,”British Journal of Aesthetics 29, 168–76.

  7. D. Jacquette, “On the Objects’ Independence from Thought” (translation of Ernst Mally, “Über die Unabhängigkeit der Gegenstände vom Denken”),Man and World 22, 215–31.

  8. D. Jacquette, “Modal Meinongian Logic,”Logique et Analyse 125–26, 113–30.

  9. D. Jacquette, “A Fregean Solution to the Paradox of Analysis,”Grazer Philosophische Studien 37, 59–73.

  10. D. Jacquette, “The Origins ofGegenstandstheorie: Immanent and Transcendent Intentional Objects in Brentano, Twardowski, and Meinong,”Brentano Studien 3, 177–202.

  11. D. Jacquette, Review of Edward N. Zalta,Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51, 439–44.

  12. D. Jacquette, “Mally, Ernst,” in H. Burkhardt and B. Smith, eds.,Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology, Philosophia Verlag, Munich and Vienna, 2, 485–86.

  13. D. Jacquette, “Meinongian Logic and Anselm’s Ontological Proof for the Existence of God,”Philosophical Forum 25, 231–40.

  14. D. Jacquette, “Abstract Entity,” in R. Audi, ed.,The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 3–4.

  15. D. Jacquette,Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence, W. de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.

  16. E. Mally,Gegenstandstheoretische Grundlagen der Logik und Logistik, Johann Ambrosius Barth, Leipzig.

  17. A. Meinong, “Über Gegenstandstheorie”, in Meinong, editor,Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie, Barth, Leipzig; rpt. [Meinong 1968], 2, 481–530.

  18. A. Meinong,Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe, edited by R. Haller and R. Kindinger in Collaboration with R. M. Chisholm, Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, Graz.

  19. T. Parsons,Nonexistent Objects, Yale University Press, New Haven.

  20. W. J. Rapaport, “Meinongian Theories and a Russellian Paradox,”Noûs 12, 153–80.

  21. J. Woods,The Logic of Fiction: A Philosophical Sounding of Deviant Logic, Mouton, The Hague.

  22. E. N. Zalta,Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

  23. E. N. Zalta,Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality, MIT/Bradford, Cambridge, MA.

  24. E. N. Zalta, “On Mally’s Alleged Heresy: A Reply,”History and Philosophy of Logic 13, 59–68.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacquette, D. Reflections on mally’s heresy. Axiomathes 8, 163–180 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02681886

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02681886

Keywords

Navigation