Skip to main content
Log in

Self-Quotation and Self-Knowledge

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I argue that indirect quotation in the first person simple present tense (“self-quotation”) provides a class of infallible assertions. The defense of this conclusion examines the joint descriptive and constitutive functions of performative utterances and argues that a parallel treatment of belief ascription is in order. The parallel account yields a class of infallible belief ascriptions that makes no appeal to privileged modes of access. Confronting a dilemma formulated by Crispin Wright for theories of self-knowledge gives an epistemological setting for the account of infallible belief ascription.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Armstrong, D. M.: 1963, ‘Is Introspective Knowledge Incorrigible?’, The Philosophical Review LXXII(4), 417–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L.: 1975, How To Do Things With Words, J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisa (eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgrami, A.: 1986, ‘Meaning, Holism and Use’, in E. LePore (ed.), Truth and Interpretation, Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 101–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1968, ‘On Saying That’, in Davidson (1984b).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1979, ‘Moods and Performances’, in Davidson (1984b).

  • Davidson, D.: 1982, ‘Communication and Convention’, in Davidson (1984b).

  • Davidson, D.: 1984a, ‘First Person Authority’, Dialectica 28(2–3), 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1984b, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.: 1991, Consciousness Explained, Little, Brown and Company, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1981, Frege: Philosophy of Language, 2nd ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G.: 1982, The Varieties of Reference, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P.: 1965, ‘Assertion’, The Philosophical Review 4, 449–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, A. P. (ed.): 1967, Knowledge and Belief: Oxford Readings in Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, J.: 1994, ‘Moore’s Paradox: A Wittgensteinian Approach’, Mind 103, 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.: 1949, The Concept of Mind, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1980, Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. One, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C.: 1987, ‘On Making Up One’s Mind: Wittgenstein on Intention’, in P. Weingartner and G. Shurz (eds.), Logic, Philosophy of Science and Epistemology: Proceedings of the XIth International Wittgenstein Symposium, Holder-Pickler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 391–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C.: 1988, ‘Moral Values, Projection and Secondary Qualities’, The Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Vol. LXII, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C.: 1989, ‘Wittgenstein on Meaning’, Mind 9, 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobsen, R. Self-Quotation and Self-Knowledge. Synthese 110, 419–445 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004905327777

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004905327777

Keywords

Navigation