Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structural entailment and semantic natural kinds

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Is there a principled difference between entailments in natural language that are valid solely in virtue of their form or structure and those that are not? This paper advances an affirmative answer to this question, one that takes as its starting point Gareth Evans’s suggestion that semantic theory aims to carve reality at the joints by uncovering the semantic natural kinds of the language. I sketch an Evans-inspired account of semantic kinds and show how it supports a principled account of structural entailment. I illustrate the account by application to a case study involving the entailment properties of adverbs; this involves developing a novel proposal about the semantics for adverbs like ‘quickly’ and ‘slowly’. In the course of the discussion I explore some implications of the account for the place of model-theoretic tools in natural language semantics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balcerak Jackson, B. (2006). Logical form: Classical conception and recent challenges. Philosophy Compass, 1, 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balcerak Jackson, B. (2007). Beyond logical form. Philosophical Studies, 132, 347–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balcerak Jackson, B. (2009). Understanding and semantic structure: Reply to Timothy Williamson. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 109, 337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balcerak Jackson B, Penka D (forthcoming) Number word constructions, degree semantics, and the metaphysics of degrees. Linguistics and Philosophy.

  • Barwise, J., & Cooper, R. (1981). Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 159–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bealer, G. (1982). Quality and concept. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bellert, I. (1977). On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 337–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. (1989). What realism implies and what it does not. Dialectica, 43, 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. (1999). Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In R. A. Wilson (Ed.), Species: New interdisciplinary essays (pp. 141–185). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, H. (2012). The puzzle(s) of absolute adjectives: On vagueness, comparison, and the origin of scale structure. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, 19, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, H. (2014). A delineation solution to the puzzles of absolute adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 37, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. J. (2002). On sense and intension. Philosophical Perspectives, 16, 135–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champollion, L. (2015). The interaction of compositional semantics and event semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 38, 31–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M. J. (1974). Adverbs and events. Synthese, 28, 455–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M. J. (1976). The semantics of degree. In B. Partee (Ed.), Montague grammar. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1966). Theories of meaning and learnable languages. In Y. Bar-Hillel (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1964 international congress for logic, methodology and philosophy of science (pp. 3–17). Amsterdam: North Holland.

  • Davidson, D. (1967a). Truth and meaning. Synthese, 17, 304–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1967b). The logical form of action sentences. In N. Rescher (Ed.), The logic of decision and action (pp. 81–95). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1970). Semantics for natural languages. In C. Olivetti (Ed.), Linguaggi nella Societa e nella Tecnica. Milan: Edizioni di Comunità.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1973). In defence of convention T. In H. Leblanc (Ed.), Truth, syntax and modality (pp. 76–86). Dordrecht: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D. (2003). The dual analysis of adjuncts and complements in categorial grammar. In Lang, M., & Fabricius-Hansen, C. (eds.), Modifying adjuncts (pp. 33–66). Berlin: de Gruyter.

  • Eckardt, R. (1998). Adverbs, events, and other things: Issues in the semantics of manner adverbs. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1985). Semantic structure and logical form. In A. Phillips (Ed.), Collected papers (pp. 49–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Higginbotham, J. (1985). On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 547–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, P. (2001). Deflating compositionality. Ratio, 14, 369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. S. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, P. (2014). Compositional semantics: An introduction to the syntax/semantics interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. (2003). Are there semantic natural kinds of words? Mind and Language, 18, 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, G. (2003). Event arguments, adverb selection, and the Stative Adverb Gap. In E. Lang, C. Maienborn, & C. Fabricius-Hansen (Eds.), Modifying adjuncts (pp. 455–474). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempson, R. (2011). Formal semantics and representationalism. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (pp. 216–241). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. (1999). Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C., & McNally, L. (2005). Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language, 81, 345–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, J. C. (2007). The nature and structure of content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E. (1980). A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the external argument from its verb. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the Lexicon (pp. 109–138). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepore, E., & Ludwig, K. (2002). What is logical form? In G. Preyer & G. Peter (Eds.), Logical form and language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1975). Languages and language. In K. Gunderson (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 3–35). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidz, J., Pietroski, P., Hunter, T., & Halberda, J. (2011). Interface transparency and the psychosemantics of ‘most’. Natural Language Semantics, 19, 227–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, P. (2002). LF and natural logic. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (Eds.), Logical form and language (pp. 132–168). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maienborn, C., & Schäfer, M. (2011). Adverbs and adverbials. In K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (Vol. II, pp. 1390–1419). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell-Ginet, S. (1982). Adverbs and logical form: A linguistically realistic theory. Language, 58, 144–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGilvray, J. (1998). Meanings are syntactically individuated and found in the head. Mind and Language, 13, 225–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R. (1974a). English as a formal language. In Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Montague, R. (1974b). Universal grammar. In Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Montague, R. (1974c). The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the semantics of english: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietroski, P. (2003a). The character of natural language semantics. In A. Barber (Ed.), The epistemology of language (pp. 217–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietroski, P. (2003b). Small verbs, complex events: Analyticity without synonymy. In L. M. Antony (Ed.), Chomsky and his critics. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietroski, P. (2005a). Events and semantic architecture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietroski, P. (2005b). Meaning before truth. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (Eds.), Contextualism in philosophy (pp. 253–300). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietroski, P. (Forthcoming). Conjoining meanings: Semantics without truth values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Pietroski, P., Lidz, J., Halberda, J., & Hunter, T. (2009). The meaning of ‘most’: semantics, numerosity, and psychology. Mind and Language, 24, 554–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, N. (1986). Frege’s puzzle. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S. (1987). Direct reference, propositional attitudes and semantic content. Philosophical Topics, 15, 47–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabó, Z. G. (2015). Major parts of speech. Erkenntnis, 80, 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabó, Z. G. (in preparation). Semantic explanations.

  • Thomason, R., & Stalnaker, R. (1973). A semantic theory of adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 4, 195–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rooij, R. (2011). Implicit vs. explicit comparatives. In P. ÉgrÉ & N. Klinedinst (Eds.), Vagueness and language use (pp. 51–72). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow, A. (1984). Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics, 3, 1–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S. (1972). Attributives and their modifiers. Noûs, 6, 310–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (1983). Semantic vs. syntactic categories. Linguistics and Philosophy, 6, 423–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (2003). Blind reasoning. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 77, 249–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (2008). The philosophy of philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C. (1981). Rule-following, objectivity and the theory of meaning. In S. H. Holtzman & C. M. Leich (Eds.), Wittgenstein: To follow a rule (pp. 99–117). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, T. E. (1999). Meaning postulates and the model-theoretic approach to natural language semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, 529–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA

    Brendan Balcerak Jackson

Authors
  1. Brendan Balcerak Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendan Balcerak Jackson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balcerak Jackson, B. Structural entailment and semantic natural kinds. Linguist and Philos 40, 207–237 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-017-9204-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-017-9204-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation