Skip to main content
Log in

Constrained egalitarianism in a simple redistributive model

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper extends a result in Dutta and Ray's (1989) theory of constrained egalitarianism initiated by relying on the concept of proportionate rather than absolute equality. We apply this framework to redistributive systems in which what the individuals get depends on what they receive or pay qua members of generally overlapping groups. We solve the constrained equalization problem for this class of models. The paper ends up comparing our solution with the alternative solution based on the Shapley value, which has been recommended in some distributive applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, A.B. and Bourguignon, F. (1987), Income distributions and differences in needs, in G.R. Feiwell (ed.), Arrow and the Foundations of Economic Policy. London: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berge, C. (1966), Espaces vectoriels topologiques, Paris, Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champsaur, P. (1975), How to share the cost of a public good, International Journal of Game Theory 42, 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chateauneuf, A. and Jaffray, J.Y. (1989), Some characterizations of lower probabilities and other monotone capacities through the use of Moebius inversion, Mathematical Social Sciences 17, 263–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, B. (1989), “The egalitarian solution and reduced game properties in convex games”, International Journal of Game Theory 19, 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, B. and Ray, D. (1989), A concept of egalitarianism under participation constraints”, Econometrica 57, 615–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, U. (1999), Using equivalent income of equivalent adults to rank income distributions, Social Choice and Welfare 16, 233–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, G.H., Littlewood, J.E. and Pólya, G. (1934), Inequalities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokari, T. (2002), Monotone-pathDutta–Ray Solutions on Convex Games, Social Choice and Welfare 19, 825–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalai, E. and Samet, D. (1988), Weighted Shapley values, in A.E. Roth (ed.), The Shapley Value: Essays in Honor of Lloyd Shapley, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A.W. and Olkin, I. (1979), Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and its Application, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D. and Green, J. R. (1995), Microeconomic Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, H. (1988), Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1992), Inequality Reexamined, Harvard University Press.

  • Shafer, G. (1976), A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. S. (1953), A value for N-person games, Contributions to the Theory of Games II, 307–317. Reprinted in H. Kuhn (ed.), Classics in Game Theory, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1997, 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, C. and Wagner, C. (1992), Characterization of monotone and 2-monotone capacities, Journal of Theoretical Probability 5, 159–167.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaffray, JY., Mongin, P. Constrained egalitarianism in a simple redistributive model. Theory and Decision 54, 33–56 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025091208248

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025091208248

Navigation