Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the Adaptive Value of Some Mate Selection Strategies

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Results of an agent-based computer simulation of the evolution of diploid sexual organisms showed that several mate selection strategies confer much higher average fitness to the simulated populations, and higher evolutionary stability to the alleles coding for these strategies, than random mating. Strategies which select for 'good genes' were very successful, and so were strategies based on assortative mating. The results support the hypothesis that mating is not likely to be random in nature and that the most successful mate selection strategies are those based on assortative mating or on advantageous genes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Andersson, M.B. (1994). Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press.

  • Andersson, M.B. and Y. Iwasa (1996). Sexual selection. Trends in Evolutionary Ecology 11: 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist, G. (1998). Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393: 784–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, T.C.M. (1993). Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornaments in sticklebacks. Nature 363: 255–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss D. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12: 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, D. and G.F. Miller (1994). Protean behavior in dynamic games: arguments for the coevolution of pursuit-evation tactics. In: Cliff P., P. Husbands, A. Meyer and S. Wilson (Editors). Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (SAB 94), M.I.T. Press, Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C.H. (1995). The effect of assortative mating and environmental variation on selection for sexual reproduction. Evolutionary Theory 11: 51–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W.G. (1985). Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 243 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W.G. (1996). Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, USA. 501 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, K. (1989). Human courtship behaviour: biological basis and cognitive processing. In: Rasa, A.E., C. Vogel and E. Voland (Editors). The sociobiology of sexual and reproductive strategies. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 147–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisler, I.L. (1984). A quantitative genetic model for the origin of mating preferences. Evolution 36: 1283-

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, W.D. (1992). Co-evolving parasites improve simulated evolution as an optimization procedure. In: C. Langton, C. Taylor, J.D. Farmer and S. Rasmussen (Editors). Artificial Life II, SFI Studies in the Science of Complexity.. AddisonWestley Publishing Company.

  • Holland, B. and W.R. Rice (1998). Perspective — chase-away sexual selection — antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houde, A.E. (1994). Effect of artificial selection on male colour pattern and mating preferences of female guppies. Proceeding of the Royal Society, London B. 256: 125–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houde, A.E. and J.A. Endler (1990). Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male color patterns in the guppy Pecilia reticulata. Science 248: 1405–1408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, K. (1995). Biodynamica: A simulation-model for biological evolution. File Biodynin.exe in http://hercules.usb.ve/-kjaffe (requires a MS Windows environment).

  • Jaffe, K. (1996.) The dynamics of the evolution of sex: Why the sexes are, in fact, always two? Interciencia 21: 259–267 and errata in 22: 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, K. (1998). Sex, male selection and evolution. Proc. 7th Inter. Conference of Evolutionary Programming, San Diego, California, USA.

  • Jaffe, K. and G. Chacon-Puignau (1995). Assortative mating: sex differences in mate selection for married and unmarried couples. Human Biology 67: 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, K., S. Issa, E. Daniels and D. Haile (1997.) Dynamics of the emergence of genetic resistance to pesticides among asexual and sexual organisms. Journal of Theoretical Biology 188: 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S.A. and S. Jonson (1992). Co-evolution to the edge of chaos: Coupled fitness landscapes, poised states and coevolutionary avalanches. In: C. Langton, C. Taylor, J.D. Farmer and S. Rasmussen (Editors). Artificial Life II, SFI Studies in the Science of Complexity. Addison-Westley Publishing Company.

  • Kondrashov, A.S. (1984). Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. I. the advantage of recombinations. Genetical Research 44: 199-.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondrashov, A.S. (1988). Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. III. Mating preferences and some general remarks. Journal of Theoretical Biology 131: 487–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S.A., B. Grenfell, A. Hastings and A.S. Perelson (1997). Mathematical and computational challenges in population biology and ecosystem science. Science, 275: 334–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith, J.M. (1978). The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.F. and P.M. Todd (1994). Evolutionary wanderlust: Sexual selection with directional mate preferences. In: D. Cliff, P. Husbands, J.A. Meyer and S. Wilson (Editors). Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (SAB-94), M.I.T. Press, Bradford Books, pp. 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, A.P. and R. Thornhill (1998). Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection — a metaanalysis. American Naturalist 151: 174–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C.G. (1998). Interaction-independent sexual selection amd the mechanisms of sexual selection. Evolution 52: 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahon, E., D. Atzmony, A. Zahavi and D. Granot (1995). Mate selection in yeast: a reconsideration of the signal and the message encoded by them. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 172: 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa, G. and K. Jaffe (1997). On sex, parasites and the red queen. Forth European Congress on Artificial Life, Sussex, UK. (Journal of Theoretical Biology. In press.)

  • Pennisi, E. (1995). Imperfect Match, do ideal mates come in symmetrical packages? Science News 147: 60–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, T. (1998). Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B, 353: 251–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff, D.A. (1992). The Evolution of Life Histories. Chapman & Hall, NY, 535 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruelle, D. (1991). Chance and Chaos. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 195 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J.P. (1989). Genetic similarity, human altruism and group selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12: 503–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soler, R.V., J. Bascompte and S.C. Manrubia (1996). Extinction: bad genes or weak chaos? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 263: 1407–1413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.D. and G.C. Williams (1982). The lek paradox is not resolved. Theoretical Population Biology 22: 392-.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen, D. and B. Gregg (1980). Human assortative mating and genetic equilibrium: an evolutionary perspective. Ethology and Soclobiology, 1: 111–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, P.M. and G.F. Miller 1991). On the sympatric origin of species: Mercurial mating in the Quicksilver model. In R.K. Belew and L.B. Booker (eds.), Proc. IV Intern. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms. pp 547–554. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann

    Google Scholar 

  • Voland, E. and C. Engel (1990). Female choice in humans: a conditional mate selection strategy of the Krummhorn women (Germany, 1720–1874). Ethology 84: 144–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedekind, C., T. Seebeck, F. Bettens and J. Paepke (1995). MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 260: 245–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, G.M. and P.M. Todd (1997). Too many love songs sexual selection and the evolution of communication. In Forth European Conference on Artificial Life, P. Husbands and I. Harvey (eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Depto. Biologia de Organismos, Universidad Simon Bolivar, Apartado 89000, Caracas, 1080, Venezuela

    Klaus Jaffe

Authors
  1. Klaus Jaffe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaffe, K. On the Adaptive Value of Some Mate Selection Strategies. Acta Biotheor 47, 29–40 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002022126388

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002022126388

Search

Navigation