Skip to main content
Log in

An American Paradox

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the paradox that while Americans generally identify themselves as environmentalists, they show little willingness to voluntarily restrain their behavior or to support specific fiscal policies that would result in increased levels of environmental protection. I explore the role of values in the explanation of this paradox, and discuss some of the difficulties involved in studying values and their role in human behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, G. and Hamilton, K.: 1996, ‘Accounting for progress: Indicators for sustainable development’, Environment 38, 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., and Shwom, R.: In Press, ‘Environmental values’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources.

  • Dunlap, T.: 2004, Faith in Nature: Environmentalism as Religious Quest, University of Washington Press, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guber, D. L.: 2003, The Grassroots of a Green Revolution: Polling America on the Environment, The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

  • Jamieson, D.: 1991, ‘The epistemology of climate change: some morals for managers’, Society and Natural Resources 4, 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, D.: 2002, Morality's Progress: Essays on Humans, Other Animals, and the Rest of Nature, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Jamieson, D.: In press a, ‘The heart of environmentalism’, in Pezzullo, P. and Sandler, R. (eds.), Environmental Justice and Environmentalism: Contrary or Complementary?, The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

  • Jamieson, D.: In press b, ‘When utilitarians should be virtue theorists’, Utilitas.

  • Jamieson, D. and VanderWerf, K: 1993, Cultural Barriers to Behavioral Change: General Recommendations and Resources for State Pollution Prevention Programs, a report to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Values and Social Policy, University of Colorado, Boulder.

  • Leiserowitz, A.: In press, ‘Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images and interpretative communities, in Moser, S. and Dilling, L. (eds.), Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change – Facilitating Social Change, Cambride University Press, Cambridge, UK.

  • Nichols, N.: 1999, ‘Cognitive illusions, heuristics, and climate prediction’, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 80, 1385–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M.: 1973, The Nature of Human Values. The Free Press, New York.

  • Stern, P.: 2000, ‘Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior’, Journal of Social Issues 56, 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, M. and Krosnick, J: 2001a, An Exploratory Study of Public Support for Government Policies to Mitigate and Adapt to Global Warming, unpublished manuscript.

  • Tichy, M. and Krosnick, J.: 2001b. Public Perceptions of Electricity Generation: An Exploratory Study, unpublished manuscript.

  • Vig, N. J. and Faure, M.: 2004. Green Giants?: Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dale Jamieson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jamieson, D. An American Paradox. Climatic Change 77, 97–102 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-9044-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-9044-8

Keywords

Navigation