Skip to main content
Log in

Philosophie und Geometrie. Zur jüngeren Protophysik-Kritik

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The critique of my protophysical approaches to operational foundation of geometry by Lucas Amiras (Journal for General Philosophy of Science Vol. 34 (2003)) concerns my first publication from 1976 but not the further 30 years of work. It does not offer any argument leading from the (erroneous) judgement “lacking success” to the conclusion “impossible”. And it is, in general, based on a philosophical defect: it ignores the principle of methodical order as leading for constructivist protophysics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Janich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janich, P. Philosophie und Geometrie. Zur jüngeren Protophysik-Kritik. J Gen Philos Sci 39, 121–130 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-008-9064-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-008-9064-y

Keywords

Navigation