Abstract
The paper argues that the debate between objectivist criticism and postmodern critique represents a fracturing of the modes of mundane social and linguistic practice. The two together miss the open-textured character of language-in-use and the reflexive properties of situated human practice. Both difference and agreement are grounded in the multiplicity of criteria that are a feature of the logical grammar of language, and therefore of everyday praxis, including that of critique. To escape the duality of foundationalism on the one hand, and radical relativism on the other, attention to the praxiological details of human action and reasoning is needed. The paper draws on Wittgensteinian philosophy and ethnomethodological studies of reasoning to make its case.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Button, G (Ed.): 1991,Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cascardi, A.: 1988, ‘History, Theory, (Post) Modernity,’ In R. Merril (Ed.),Ethics/Aesthetics: Post-Modern Position, Maisonneuve Press, Washington D.C, pp. 27–45.
Cavell, S.: 1961–62,The Claim to Rationality: Knowledge and the Basis of Morality, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University.
Connolly, W. E.: 1974,The Terms of Political Discourse, Lexington, D.C. Heath and Company
Connolly, W. E.:1989, ‘Identity and Difference in Global Politics’, In J. Der Derian and M. J. Shapiro (Eds.),International/Intertextual Relations: Post-Modern Readings of World Politics, Lexington Books
Cook-Gumperz, J.:1975, ‘The Child As Practical Reasoner’, In M. Sanchez and B. Blount (Eds.),Socio-Cultural Dimensions of Language Use, Academic Press, New York, pp. 137–162.
Coulter, J.:1990, ‘Elementary Properties of Argument Sequences’, In George Psathas (Ed.),Interaction Competence, University Press of America, Washington D.C.
Coulter, J.:1991, ‘Logic: Ethonomethodology and the Logic of Language’, In G. Button (Ed.),Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dewey, J.: 1957,Reconstruction in Philosophy, Boston.
Foucault, M.: 1970,The Order of Things., Random House, New York.
Galeano, E.:1973,Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent, Monthly Review Press, New York.
Gallie, W. B.:1956, ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, InProceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Vol. 56, London. Reprinted in Max Black (Ed.),The Importance of Language, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 1962, pp. 121–46.
Garfinkel, H.: 1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Garfinkel, H.:1991, ‘Respecification’, In G. Button (Ed.),Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hebdige, D.: 1988,Hiding in the Light, Routledge, London.
Jayyusi, L.: 1984,Categorization and the Moral Order, Routledge & Kegan Paul, Henley.
Jayyusi, L.: 1989, ‘Conventionality and Difference’, Paper presented to the 1st D.A.R.G. Conference on Understanding Language Use in Everyday Life, 23–6 August Calgary, Canada.
Jayyusi, L.: 1991, ‘Values and Moral Judgment: Communicative Praxis As a Moral Order’, In G. Button (Ed.),Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 227–251.
Jayyusi, L.:in press, ‘“The Record Shows...”: Fact and Disagreement in the Bush/Rather interview’, InResearch on Language and Social Interaction.
Louch, A. R.: 1966,Explanation and Human Action, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Marx, K.: 1965,The German Ideology, Lawrence Wishart, London.
McCarthy, T.:1990a, ‘Private Irony and Public Decency: Richard Rorty's New Pragmatism’,Critical Inquiry 16, 355–370.
McCarthy, T.:1990b, ‘Ironist Theory as a Vocation: A Response to Rorty's Reply’,Critical Inquiry 16, 644–655.
Rorty, R.:1967, (Ed.)The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method, Chicago.
Rorty, R.: 1989,Contingency, Irony & Solidarity, Cambridge University Press,Cambridge.
Rorty, R.: 1990, ‘Truth and Freedom: A Reply to Thomas McCarthy;Critical Inquiry 16, 633–643.
Rorty, R.:1991, ‘Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism’, InObjectivity, Relativism and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Vol. I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, First published inThe Journal of Philosophy 80, 583-9.
Ryle, G.:1949,The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson Cambridge, London.
Ryle, G.:1954,Dilemmas, Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H.: 1964–72,Transcribed Lectures, (Unpublished: School of Social Sciences: University of California at Irvine): Lecture on Paradox.
Sacks, H.:1967, ‘The Search for Help: No-One to Turn To’, In E. Schneidman (Ed.),Essays in Self Destruction, Science House, New York, 203–33.
Sacks, H.:1972a, ‘An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Data for Doing Sociology’, In D. N. Sudnow (Ed.),Studies in Social Interaction, Free Press, New York, 31–74.
Sacks, H.: 1972b, ‘On the Analyzability of Stories by Children’, In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.),Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, 329–45.
Schutz, A.: 1962,Collected Papers I, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
Waismann, F.:1965, Verifiability, in A. G. N. Flew (Ed.),Logic and Language, 1st & 2nd Series, Doubleday, New York.
Winch, P.:1970, ‘Understanding a Primitive Society’, In B. R. Wilson (Ed.),Rationality, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 78–111.
Winch, P.: 1972, ‘Ethics and Action, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1964,Blue and Brown Books, Harper & Row, New York & Evanston.
Wittgenstein, L.:1968,Philosophical Investigations, trans by G. E. M. Anscombe, 3rd Edition. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Wittgenstein, L.:1974,On Certainty, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jayyusi, L. Language, moral order and political praxis. Argumentation 9, 75–93 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733101
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733101