Abstract
This paper argues that more attention should be paid to the civic functions of ethical discourse about the professions and to the moral virtues inherent in their practice and traditions. The ability of professional ethics to articulate civic ideals and virtues is discussed in relation to three issues. First, should professional ethics aim to enlighten ethical understanding or to motivate ethical conduct? Second, how should professional ethics define the professional's moral responsibilities in the face of ethical dilemmas — should the professional attempt to resolve the dilemma ethically or to change the social conditions that create the dilemma in the first place? The third issue discussed in the paper is whether professional ethics should be based on the model of regulation and rational self-interest or on the model of virtue and a fundamental personal commitment to the ideal of a certain form of life? In order for work in professional ethics to attain intellectual credibility among a non-philosophical audience, it must develop a coherent and convincing position on each of these issues.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Bruce Jennings is Associate for Policy Studies at the Hastings Center in Briarcliff Manor, NY. His publications include Representation and Responsibility: Exploring Legislative Ethics and Applying the Humanities, as well as numerous articles on ethical issues in public policy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jennings, B. The regulation of virtue: Cross-currents in professional ethics. J Bus Ethics 10, 561–568 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382873
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382873