Skip to main content
Log in

Ceteris paribus clauses, closure clauses and falsifiability

  • Aufsätze
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The article argues thatceteris paribus clauses have to be separated from another type of clauses called closure clauses. The former are associated with laws and theories, the latter with test situations of a particular kind. It is also argued that closure clauses, but notceteris paribus clauses, make Popper's falsifiability principle untenable. In that way, it also resolves the quarrel between Popper and Lakatos aboutceteris paribus clauses and falsifiability by saying that both are partly wrong and partly right.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

LiteraturReferences

  • Lakatos, I. and A. Musgrave (eds.):Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge 1970).

  • Schilpp, P. A. (ed.):The Philosophy of Karl Popper (La Salle, Illinois 1974).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johansson, I. Ceteris paribus clauses, closure clauses and falsifiability. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 11, 16–22 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801276

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801276

Keywords

Navigation