Skip to main content
Log in

Questions from the Rough Ground: Teaching, Autobiography and the Cosmopolitan “I”

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article I explore how cosmopolitanism can be a challenge for ordinary language philosophy. I also explore cosmopolitan aspects of Stanley Cavell’s ordinary language philosophy. Beginning by considering the moral aspects of cosmopolitanism and some examples of discussions of cosmopolitanism in philosophy of education, I turn to the scene of instruction in Wittgenstein and to Stanley Cavell’s emphasis on the role of autobiography in philosophy. The turn to the autobiographical dimension of ordinary language philosophy, especially its use of “I” and “We”, becomes a way to work on the tension between the particular and the universal claims of cosmopolitanism. I show that the autobiographical aspects of philosophy and the philosophical significance of autobiographical writing in ordinary language philosophy can be seen as a test of representativeness—a test of the ground upon which one stands when saying “I”, “We” and “You.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Quoted in Conant (2002, p. 89).

  2. In Cavell’s case, as in most cases, which is made clear in his autobiography, things are clearly more complex than just saying that he writes from an American perspective and experience. He is also a secular Jew born of immigrant parents, he is a former musician, he is as much published and referred to in other contexts than philosophy as in philosophy, he is equally engaged in what may be called continental philosophy as with analytic philosophy, he is a father and son, a husband, and a university teacher among a range of other things.

  3. I owe this formulation, and many of the insights in this part of the article, to Sandra Laugier (2006, p. 21) and Naomi Scheman (2011, pp. 104–105).

  4. The most expansive of Cavell’s discussions of the term acknowledgment is found in the final part of The Claim of Reason (1979) called “Between Acknowledgment and Avoidance”, but also in his earlier work particularly in the essays “Knowing and Acknowledging” and “The Avoidance of Love”, which form the conclusion of the book Must We Mean What We Say? (2002). However, the theme reoccurs in different forms throughout Cavell’s later work.

  5. Although, I focus on the moral aspects here I think much of what is said about the cosmopolitan aspects of ordinary language philosophy applies to other forms of cosmopolitanism too. To show this is a task for another paper.

  6. For Cavell’s discussion of Mill and Kant as exemplifying how they transcend their own principles see Cavell (2004, Ch. 5 and 7).

  7. Another alternative approach to the “We” problem that Saito and Standish consider is different forms of patriotism. Given my aims in this article I avoid the discussion of patriotism at this stage.

  8. Hansen’s examples are of teachers who are constantly both rooted in the local and open to the new (Hansen 2010, pp. 20–22), although I prefer using the notion “different” instead of “new”.

  9. This is my caricature of Saul Kripke’s (1982) reading of this passage from Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations.

  10. For further discussion see my Dissonant Voices (2013).

  11. The idea that we need to recognise ourselves in Wittgenstein’s writings and the worry that we do not seems to have been a theme of his from his early writings in the Tractatus throughout all of his later writings (Klagge 2011, ch. 2–4).

  12. For Cavell’s work on Hollywood films see Pursuits of Happiness (1981) and Contesting Tears (1996), and for readings of Ibsen and films see Cities of Words (2004). For readings of Shakespeare see relevant chapters of Must We Mean What We Say? (2002) and part IV of The Claim of Reason (1979) as well as in Disowning Knowledge (2003).

References

  • Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. (1964). Sense and sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bäckström, S. (2009) The skeptic’s dilemma and what it reveals. In N. Forsberg, & S. Jansson (Eds.), Acknowledging Stanley Cavell (pp. 1–21). Uppsala: Uppsala Philosophical Studies.

  • Baz, A. (2012). When words are called for: A defense of ordinary language philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2006). The cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., & Sznaider, N. (2006). Unpacking cosmopolitanism in the social sciences: A research agenda. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 381–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (1979). The claim of reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (1981). Pursuits of happiness: The Hollywood comedy of remarriage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (1989). This new yet unapproachable America: Lectures after Emerson after Wittgenstein. New Mexico: Living Batch Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (1990). Conditions, handsome and unhandsome: The constitution of Emersonian perfectionism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (1992). The senses of Walden. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (1994). A pitch of philosophy: Autobiographical exercises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Cavell, S. (1996). Contesting tears: The Hollywood melodrama of the unknown woman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (2002). Must we mean what we say?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (2003). Disowning knowledge: Seven plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (2004). Cities of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (2006). L’importanza del Walden di Thoreau, Annali del Dipartimento di Filosofia (Nuova Serie), XII.

  • Cavell, S. (2010). Little did i know: Excerpts from memory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, J. (2002). On going the bloody Hard Way in Philosophy. In J. H. Whittaker (Ed.), The possibilities of sense (pp. 85–129). New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. (2013). The claims of documentary: Expanding the educational significance of documentary film. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(19), 1018–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D. T. (2010). Cosmopolitanism and education: A view from the ground. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P., & Peters, R. (1970). The logic of education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, V. (2013). Dissonant voices: Philosophy, children's literature and perfectionist education. Stockholm: Department of Education. Doctoral Dissertation.

  • Kant, I. (1997) Groundwork of the metaphysics of Morals M. Gregor (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Klagge, J. (2011). Wittgenstein in exile. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein: On rules and private language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1991). Strangers to ourselves. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laugier, S. (2006). Wittgenstein and Cavell: Anthropology, skepticism and politics. In A. Norris (Ed.), The claim to community: Essays on Stanley Cavell and political philosophy (pp. 19–37). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (2001). Utilitarianism. Kishtener: Bartoche Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1996). Patriotism and cosmopolitanism. In M. Nussbaum (Ed.), For love and country? (pp. 3–20). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papastephanou, M. (2011). The ‘Cosmopolitan’ self does her homework. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(4), 597–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito, N. (2007). Truth is translated: Cavell’s Thoreau and the transcendence of America. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 21(2), 124–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, N. (2009). Ourselves in translation: Stanley Cavell and philosophy as autobiography. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43(2), 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito, N. (2011). Becoming cosmopolitan: On the idea of a Japanese response to American philosophy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 47(4), 507–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito, N. (2012). The gleam of light: Initiation, prophesy, and emersonian moral perfectionism. In N. Saito & P. Standish (Eds.), Stanley Cavell and the education of grownups (pp. 170–185). New York: University of Fordham Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saito, N., & Standish, S. (2010). Crossing borders within: Stanley Cavell and the politics of interpretation. Educational Theory, 60(4), 419–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheman, N. (2011). A Storied World: On Meeting and Being Met. In R. Eldridge & B. Rhie (Eds.), Stanley Cavell and literary studies: Consequences of skepticism (pp. 92–105). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K.-C. (2004). Justice without borders: Cosmopolitanism, nationalism and patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, S. (2009). Toward an imperfect education: Facing humanity, rethinking cosmopolitanism. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viktor Johansson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johansson, V. Questions from the Rough Ground: Teaching, Autobiography and the Cosmopolitan “I”. Stud Philos Educ 34, 441–458 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9446-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9446-z

Keywords

Navigation