Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Illusory possibilities and imagining counterparts

  • Epistemology
  • Published:
Acta Analytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given Kripke’s semantic views, a statement, such as ‘Water is H2O’, expresses a necessary a posteriori truth. Yet it seems that we can conceive that this statement could have been false; hence, it appears that we can conceive impossible states of affairs as holding. Kripke used a de dicto strategy and a de re strategy to address three illusions that arise with respect to necessary a posteriori truths: (1) the illusion that a statement such as ‘Water is H2O’ possibly expresses a falsehood, (2) the illusion that conceivability can fail to latch on to a genuine metaphysical possibility, and (3) the illusion that one can access a real metaphysical possibility by conceiving that water is not H2O. In this paper I argue that while Kripke’s de dicto strategy dispels (1), his strategies do not enable him to dispel (2) and (3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almog, Joseph 2002: What Am I, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, David 2002: ‘Does Conceivability Entail Possibility’ Conceivability and Possibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. and Rosenkrantz, G. 2002: The Divine Attributes, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul 1981 Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, John 2001: Knowledge, Possibility, and Consciousness, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary 1990: ‘Is Water Necessarily H2O?’ Realism with a Human Face, Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Alex 1989: “Is Lewis’s ‘Genuine Modal Realism’ Magic Too?”, Mind 98, 411–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yablo, Stephen, “Illusions of Possibility” forthcoming in Manuel García-Carpintero and Josep Macià, eds., The Two-Dimensional Framework: Foundations and Applications, (Oxford University Press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Arts and Sciences Department of Philosophy, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, PO Box 26170, 27402-6170, Greensboro, NC, USA

    Janine Jones

Authors
  1. Janine Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, J. Illusory possibilities and imagining counterparts. Acta Anal 19, 19–43 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-004-1001-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-004-1001-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation