Skip to main content
Log in

Learning as Calling and Responding

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue, our being-in-the-world is to be conceived of as an existential dialogue. Elsewhere, I have conceptualized the teacher–student-relation accordingly (see Jons 2008), as a matter of calling and responding. The conceptualization rests on a secularised notion of vocation, paving way for discovering, articulating and discerning pedagogical relations in a new way. In the present article, I take this conceptualization one step further, applying the concept of calling and responding to the pedagogical relation between a learner—might it be a student or a scholar—and the subject studied. The aim of the study is to afford a new way of conceiving the process as well as the outcome of learning. Thinking learning within the framework of calling and responding means understanding the learner and the subject as addressing and responding to each other. This means that predicaments of the subject—such as the truths that the subject holds and the anomalies it suffers from—address the learner in e g lectures, readings, theories, assignments, challenging the knowledge of the learner and in responding to this address, the learner in turn challenges the truths of the subject. By paying heed to, responding responsibly and challenging each other, the outcome of learning becomes a twofold phenomenon, namely both the learner and the subject reconstituting themselves, enlarged by the contribution of each other’s mode of coming-into-presence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aspelin, J. (2011). Co-existence and co-operation: The two-dimensional conception of education. Education, 1, 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspelin, J., & Persson, S. (2011). Om relationell pedagogik. Malmö: Gleerups Utbildning AB. In Swedish (On relational pedagogy).

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson, & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas press.

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. Mc Gee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Towards a philosophy of the act. (V. Liapunov, & M. Holquist Ed., V. Liapunov, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press. (Russian orig (1986). K filosofii postupka. In Filosofiia i sotsiologiia nauki i tekhniki: Ezhegodnik 19841985 (pp 82–138). Moscow: Nauka).

  • Biesta, G. (1999). Radical intersubjectivity. Reflections on a different foundation of education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 18, 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2004a). Against learning. Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning. Nordisk Pedagogik, 1, 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2004b). The community of those who have nothing in common: Education and the language of responsibility. Interchange, 35, 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, C., & Sidorkin, A. M. (Eds.). (2004). No education without relation. New York: Peter Lang Pub Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björk, G. (2000). Pedagogik i exil. En bildningsfilosofisk studie med existentiellt fokus. (Education in exile. A philosophical study of education with an existential focus). (PhD dissertation, in Swedish with an english summary). Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.

  • Bollnow, O. F. (1969). Existensfilosofi og pedagogikk. (Översättning och inledning R Myhre). Oslo: Fabritius & Sønner. (German original (1959). In Existenzphilosophie und Pädagogik. Stuttgart: Kolhammer) In Norwegian.

  • Buber, M. (1961). Two types of faith: A study of the interpenetration of Judaism and Christianity. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1967). Replies to my critics. In S. P. Arthur, & F. Maurice (Eds.). The philosophy of Martin Buber (M. Friedman, Trans.). La Salle: Open Court.

  • Buber, M. (1990). Människan och hennes bildkonst. (P. Sällström, Trans.). Ludvika: Dualis. (German orig (1955). Der Mensch und sein Gebild ur Beiträge zu einer philosophischen Anthropologie. Heidelberg: Lambert Schneider.) (English version (1988). Man and his image-work. In The knowledge of man. A philosophy of the interhuman (M. Friedman, Ed., M. Friedman, & R. G. Smith, Trans.). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press).

  • Buber, M. (1993a). Dialogens väsen. Ludvika: Dualis. (German orig (1929/1932). Zwiesprache—Traktat vom dialognischen Leben. Berlin: Schocken-Verlag). (English version (1965). Dialogue. In Between man and man (R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Maximillan Paperbacks.

  • Buber, M. (1993b). Om Uppfostran (L. W. Freij, Trans.). Ludvika: Dualis. (German orig (1953) Reden über Erziehung. Heidelberg: Verlag Lambert Schneider.) (English version (1965). Education. In Between man and man (R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Maximillan Paperbacks.

  • Buber, M. (1993c). Människans väg. (M. Engström, Trans.). Ludvika: Dualis. (German orig (1960). Der Weg des Menschen nach der chassidischen Lehre. Heidelberg: Verlag Lambert Schneider). (English version (1965). The way of man. According to the teachings of Hasidism. London: Collins Books.

  • Buber, M. (1994). Jag och Du. (Margit, & C. Norell, Trans.) Ludvika: Dualis. (German orig (1923). Ich und Du. Heidelberg: Lambert Schneider). (English version (1970). I and Thou (2nd ed., W. Kauffman, Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons).

  • Buber, M. (1995a). Det mellanmänskliga (2nd ed., P. Sällström, Trans.). Ludvika: Dualis. (German orig (1954). Elemente des Zwischenmenschlischen. In Die Schriften über das dialogische Princip. Heidelberg: Verlag Lambert Scneider.) (English version (1988). Elements of the Interhuman. In The knowledge of man. A philosophy of the interhuman (M. Friedman, Ed., M. Friedman, & R. G. Smith, Trans.). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press).

  • Buber, M. (1995b). Logos. Två essäer. Ludvika: Dualis. (Germ orig (1962). Logos—zwei Reden. Heidelberg: Verlag Lambert Schneider). (English version (1988). The word that is Spoken and What is Common to All. In The knowledge of man. A philosophy of the interhuman (M. Friedman, Ed., M. Friedman, & R. G. Smith, Trans.). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press).

  • Buber, M. (1996). Distans och relation. Bidrag till en filosofisk antropologi (P. Sällström, Trans.). Ludvika: Dualis. (Germ orig (1951). Urdistanz und Beziehung. Heidelberg: Verlag Lambert Schneider.) (English version (1988). Distance and Relation. In The knowledge of man. A philosophy of the interhuman (M. Friedman, Ed., M. Friedman, & R. G. Smith, Trans.). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press).

  • Claesson, S. (red). (2011). Undervisning och existens. (Teaching and existence). In Swedish, Gothenburg: Daidalos.

  • Cousin, G. (2006). Threshold concepts, troublesome knowledge and emotional capital: An exploration into learning about others. In: Meyer, Jan H. F., & Land, Ray (Eds.). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge.

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson, & G. Burchill, Trans.). London: Verso. (French orig (1991). Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? Paris: Éditions de Minuit).

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (2000). Truth and method (2nd rev Ed., J. Weinsheimer, & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York: Continuum. (Germ orig (1986). Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 1, 5th revised and expanded Ed.). Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr).

  • Heidegger, M. (1992). Varat och Tiden del I & II (R. Matz, Trans.). Gothenburg: Daidalos. (German orig (1926). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.) (English version (1978). Being and time (J. Macquarrie, & E. Robinson, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

  • Heidegger, M. (1993). Letter on humanism (F. Capuzzi, with J. G. Gray, Trans.). In Farrell, D. (Ed.). Heidegger. The basic writings. San Francisco: Harper. (German orig (1947). Brief über den Humanismus. Bern: A Francke Verlag).

  • Heidegger, M. (1998). Metafysiken som varats historia (D. Birnbaum, & S.-O. Wallenstein, Trans.). Stockholm: Thales. (German orig (1961). Die Methaphysik als Geschichte des Seins. Stuttgart: Verlag Günter Neske).

  • Holquist, M. (2002). Dialogism. Bakhtin and his world (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jons, L. (2008). Till-tal och an-svar. En konstruktion av pedagogisk hållning. (Calling and respons(e)ibility. A construction of pedagogical creed. (PhD Dissertation, in Swedish with an English summary). Stockholm: Stockholm University, Department of Education).

  • Karlsen, G. (2003). Møtets etikk og estetikk. Betraktninger om et alternativt lærerideal. (The ethics and aesthetics of encountering. Reflections on an alternate teacher-ideal. (PhD dissertation, in Norwegian). Trondheim: Pedagogiska institutet vid NTNU.

  • Karlsen, G. (2004). The potential of vulnerability. Challenges in personal teaching. Paper presented at Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain Conference at University of London, Institute of Education. Internet: http://k1.ioe.ac.uk/pesgb/z/Karlsen.pdf on 2007-12-19.

  • Kepnes, S. (1992). The text as Thou. Martin Bubers dialogical hermeneutics and narrative theology. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, R., Meyer, J. H. F., & Baillie, C. (2010). Editors’ preface: Threshold concepts and transformational learning. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & C. Baillie (Eds.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingis, A. (1994). The Community of Those Who Have Nothing in Common. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

  • McCune, V., & Hounsell, D. (2005). The development of students’ ways of thinking and practising in three final-year biology courses. Higher Education, 49, 255–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising, In: Rust, C. (Ed.), Improving student learning: Theory and practice 10 years On. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development (OCSLD) (pp. 412–424). (See also for an on-line version: Enhancing teaching-learning environments in undergraduate courses, ETL Project, Occasional Report 4, May 2003).

  • Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Issues of liminality. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.-L. (2000). Being singular plural. (R. D. Richardson, & A. E. O’Byrne, Trans.). California: Stanford University Press. (French orig (1996). Être singulier pluriel. Paris: Èditions Galilée).

  • Perkins, D. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, N. (2009). Exploring disciplinarity in academic development: Do “ways of thinking and practicing” help faculty to think about learning and teaching? In K. Carolin, (Ed.). The university and its disciplines. Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries. London: Routledge.

  • Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, S. (2001). “Bringing more than I contain”: Ethics, curriculum and the pedagogical demand for altered egos. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33, 431–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, S. (2003a). A fine risk to be run? The ambiguity of eros and teacher responsibility. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 22, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, S. (2003b). Learning from the other. Levinas, psychoanalysis, and ethical possibilities in education. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, T. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin: The dialogical principle (W. Godzich, Trans.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  • Vattimo, G. (1996). Utöver tolkningen. Hermeneutikens betydelse (W. Fovet, Trans.). Gothenburg: Daidalos. (English version (1997). Beyond interpretation: the meaning of hermeneutics for philosophy (D. Webb, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press).

  • von Wright, M. (2000). Vad eller Vem? En pedagogisk rekonstruktion av G H Meads teori om människors intersubjectivitet. (What or Who? An educational reconstruction of G. H. Mead’s theory of human intersubjectivity. Göteborg: Daidalos).

  • von Wright, M. (2006). The punctual fallacy of participation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(2), 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lotta Jons.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jons, L. Learning as Calling and Responding. Stud Philos Educ 33, 481–493 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-013-9398-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-013-9398-8

Keywords

Navigation