Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Marcus Aurelius, the Stoic Ethic, and Adam Smith

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In The Theory of Moral Sentiments (TMS) Adam Smith draws on the Stoic idea of a Providence that uses everything for the good of the whole. The process is often painful, so the Stoic ethic insisted on conscious cooperation. Stoic ideas contributed to the rise of science and enjoyed wide popularity in Smith’s England. Smith was more influenced by the Stoicism of his professors than by the Epicureanism of Hume. In TMS, Marcus Aurelius’s “helmsman” becomes the “impartial spectator,” who judges actions in terms of the way they are seen by others. This is the key to justice, without which society collapses. Business school students should be taught that Smith’s “invisible hand” is best understood as a universal rationality that uses just actions for the benefit of the whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, E. V.: 1911, Roman Stoicism (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Birely, A.: 1987, Marcus Aurelius (Routledge, London, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, A., and A. Wiggin: 2003, Financial Reckoning Day (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, W. T.: 1982, The Economy of Mind (Universe Books, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, J.: 2006, The Authentic Adam Smith (W. W. Norton, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambell, R.: 1969. ‘Introduction’, Seneca: Letters from a Stoic (Penguin, London, U. K.).

  • Clarke, P. H.: 2000, ‘Adam Smith, Stoicism and Religion in the 18th Century,’ History of the Human Sciences, 13(4), 49-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay, D.: 2006, ‘Introduction’, Meditations (Penguin, London, U. K.).

  • Collins, J.: 2009, How the Mighty Fall (HarperCollins, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Copleston, F.: 1963, A History of Philosophy (Image Books, Garden City, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Botton, A.: 2000, The Consolations of Philosophy (Random House, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durant, W.: 1944, Caesar and Christ (Simon and Schuster, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbons, A.: 1995, Adam Smith’s System of Liberty, Wealth, and Virtue (Clarendon, Oxford, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T.: 2005, The World is Flat (Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., and R. Friedman: 1982, Free to Choose (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E.: 1932, The Roman Way (W. W. Norton, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, L.: 2001, ‘The Hidden Theology of Adam Smith,’ The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 8(1), 1-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, L.: 2004, ‘Further Reflections on the “Hidden Theology of Adam Smith”.‘ The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 11(4), 629-635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M.: 2006, The Seven Signs of Ethical Collapse (St. Martin’s, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P.: 1976, A History of Christianity (Simon and Schuster, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettler, D.: 1965, The Social and Political Thought of Adam Ferguson (University of Indiana Press, Bloomington, IN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R., E. Newton, and P. Pommerenke: 1993, ‘Self-Enhancement Biases and Negotiator Judgment: Effects of Self Esteem and Mood,’ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56(1), 110-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus Aurelius: [180] 1964, Meditations, trans. Maxwell Staniforth (Penguin, London, UK)

  • Marcus Aurelius: [180] 2006, Meditations, trans. Martin Hammond (Penguin, London, UK)

  • McClelland, D.: 1961, The Achieving Society (Macmillan, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutarch: [120] 2001, Plutarch’s Lives, trans. John Dryden (Modern Library, New York, NY)

  • Smith, P.: 1934, The Enlightenment (Collier Books, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.: [1759] 2001, The Theory of Moral Sentiments (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK)

  • Smith, A.: [1776] 1937, The Wealth of Nations (Modern Library, New York, NY)

  • von Mises, L.: [1949] 1996, Human Action, 4th ed. revised (Fox & Wilkes, San Francisco, CA)

  • Weber, M.: 1946, From Max Weber, Ed. H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills (Oxford University Press, New York, NY)

  • Witherspoon, A.: 1951, The College Survey of English Literature (Harcourt, Brace, and World, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harold B. Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, H.B. Marcus Aurelius, the Stoic Ethic, and Adam Smith. J Bus Ethics 95, 89–96 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0349-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0349-9

Keywords

Navigation