Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What Do We Mean When We Call Someone a Drug Addict?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When thinking about the harms of drug addiction, there is a tendency to focus on the harms of drug consumption. But not all harms associated with drug addiction are caused by drug consumption. There is at least another dimension of harm worth considering: what I call the linguistic harm of drug addiction. Starting with an analysis of ‘drug addict’ as it appears in the media, I argue that ‘drug addict’ is inconsistently applied to people with drug addiction and that this inconsistency reveals two important features of the term. First, being called a ‘drug addict’ is worse than being described as ‘having a drug problem’. Second, being called a drug addict exacerbates the challenges experienced by people with drug addiction. Referencing the ‘addict’ narrative, I detail how calling someone a drug addict can add to the marginalization of people with drug addiction and argue that to eliminate the linguistic harm of drug addiction, we ought to reduce it first. Using the analysis of ‘drug addict’ from the first half of the paper, I propose a novel harm reduction strategy that benefits people with drug addiction but calls on people who do not use drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For an especially troubling usage of ‘junkie,’ see [9], in which ants who choose morphine over nutrition are described as “true junkies”.

  2. For this paper, I only use the term ‘drug addict’ for the sake of simplicity. However, my analysis holds for similar terms such as ‘druggie’, ‘drug user’, ‘drug abuser’, ‘junkie’, among others. I take these terms to be (relatively) interchangeable because they are all instances of disease-first (person-second) language. They identify a subject by their relationship to drug use instead of identifying a subject, first, as a person and then describing their behavior (i.e. someone who uses drugs).

  3. It is especially telling that Oxford Languages, the world’s leading dictionary publisher, defines ‘drug addict’ as “a person who is addicted to an illegal drug” (emphasis, mine).

  4. I detail the stigmatizing nature of the term ‘drug addict’ in section four.

  5. A brief summary of the theories of social kinds are available in Table 1.

  6. My formulation of ‘drug addict’ as a description-dependent social kind is an adapted version of Ásta’s formulation of description-dependent social kinds in general. See [35] and [34].

  7. There are different ways to formulate response-addiction, but I have taken and modified Ásta’s version. See [34].

  8. I refer to Ásta Kristjana Sveinsdóttir as just Ásta because, in the Icelandic language, surnames do not exist.

    Sveinsdóttir means daughter of Sveins. Following North American convention, then, it is more appropriate to refer to Ásta as just Ásta, much like how one would refer to people who only have one name.

  9. This is an adaptation of Ásta’s formulation. See [34].

  10. Ásta might try to revise my analysis by arguing that there can be two or more grounding properties and that the context-sensitivity of her framework leaves open the possibility of different subjects being conferred the property of ‘drug addict’ at different times. This attempt ultimately fails, however, because to adequately supplement my original formulation of ‘drug addict’ as a conferred property, she would either end up creating such a tight formulation that the conferral of ‘drug addict’ amounts to mere epistemic discernment or too loose a formulation that the conferral of ‘drug addict’ loses its epistemic objectivity. In the first case, Ásta may try to figure out just which grounding properties in which contexts are sufficient for the conferral of ‘drug addict’. However, in detailing such conditions, the conferral of a property would become meaningless. The subject who does the conferral is not conferring the constraints and privileges of ‘drug addict’ as much as they are determining who already has those constraints and privileges (re: description-dependent social kind). In the second case, Ásta would have to leave too much to the subject who does the conferral. A set of grounding properties may therefore be sufficient for some subjects to confer ‘drug addict’, but not enough or too much for others. In this sense, ‘drug addict’ would turn out to be too subjective – it appears that anyone could be made into a ‘drug addict’ since only the beliefs of the person who does the conferral matters (re: response-dependent social kind).

  11. See page 1 for a brief summary of ‘the addict narrative’ and FN 2 for related readings.

  12. The harm of being called a drug addict would thus fall under the umbrella of the harms experienced by people who use drugs, as opposed to the harms caused by drug use. See [19].

References

  1. Brico, E. (2019). ‘Junkie’ caricatures make us all more vulnerable to addiction. Filter. https://filtermag.org/2019/03/05/junkie-caricatures-make-us-all-more-vulnerable-to-addiction/amp. Accessed February 2019.

  2. Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction. (2019). “Overcoming stigma through language: A primer.” Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction. Resource Document. https://www.ccsa.ca/sites/default/files/2019-09/CCSA-Language-and-Stigma-in-Substance-Use-Addiction-Guide-2019-en.pdf. Accessed September 2020.

  3. Canale, M. K., & Munn, E. (2005). The stigma of addiction project. Visions Journal, 2(6), 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carlson, M. (2018). The information politics of journalism in a post-truth age. Journalism Studies, 19(3), 1879–1888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Castaneda, R. (2017). Is calling someone addicted to drugs or alcohol a substance ‘abuser’ harmful? U.S. News. https://health.usnews.com/wellness/articles/2017-06-12/is-calling-someone-addicted-to-drugs-or-alcohol-a-substance-abuser-harmful. Accessed September 2020.

  6. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. (2020). Addressing Stigma. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. Resource Document. https://www.camh.ca/en/driving-change/addressing-stigma. Accessed September 2020.

  7. Cheung, Y. W. (2000). Substance abuse and developments in harm reduction. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 162(12), 1697–1700.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Duff, C. (2016). Assemblages, territories, contexts. International Journal of Drug Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Entler, B. V., Cannon, J. T., & Seid, M. A. (2016). Ants discover inner junkie. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.149047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fleming, A. R. (2016). After their children died of overdoses, these families chose to tell the truth. The Record. https://www.therecord.com/life/2016/09/17/after-their-children-died-of-overdoses-these-families-chose-to-tell-the-truth.html. Accessed September 2020.

  11. Giusti, S. (n.d.). How to be human: Talking to people with addiction or substance use disorders. Healthline. https://www.healthline.com/health/addiction/how-to-be-human-language-around-substance-abuse#takeaway. Accessed September 2020.

  12. Goodman, A. (2018). The outcast project: Humanizing heroin users through documentary photography and photo-elicitation. In H. Pickard & S. H. Ahmed (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy and science of addiction (pp. 415–430). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Government of Canada. (2010). Stigma around substance use. Health Canada. Resource document. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/substance-use/problematic-prescription-drug-use/opioids/stigma.html. Accessed September 2020.

  14. Gray, R. (2010). Shame, labeling and stigma: Challenges to counseling clients in alcohol and other drug settings. Contemporary Drug Problems, 37(4), 685–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hill, V. (2019). Author walked a long, difficult road to find healing. The Record. https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-region/2019/02/07/author-walked-a-long-difficult-road-to-find-healing.html. Accessed September 2020.

  16. Hughes, K. (2007). Migrating identities: The relational constitution of drug use and addiction. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29(5), 673–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelly, J. F., & Westerhoff, C. M. (2010). Does it matter how we refer to individuals with substance-related conditions? A randomized study of two commonly used terms. International Journal of Drug Policy, 21(3), 202–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lentinello, E. (2017). The acceptance project: Reducing stigma and discrimination towards mental illness and substance use problems among community health centre staff. Evidence Exchange Network for Mental Health and Addictions. Resource document. https://www.eenet.ca/resource/acceptance-project-reducing-stigma-and-discrimination-towards-mental-illness-and-substance. Accessed September 2020.

  19. Little, J., & Frankskoviak, P. (2010). So glad you came! harm reduction therapy in community settings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 175–188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mason, R. (2018). Social metaphysics. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-N135-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Matthews, S., Dwyer, R., & Snoek, A. (2017). Stigma and self-stigma in addiction. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 14(2), 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Monteiro, L. (2019). Kitchener man goes to prison for trafficking after friend dies of overdose. The Record. https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-region/2019/04/08/kitchener-man-goes-to-prison-for-trafficking-after-friend-dies-of-overdose.html. Accessed September 2020.

  23. Moore, D., & Fraser, S. (2006). Putting at risk what we know: Reflecting on the drug-using subject in harm reduction and its political implications. Social Science and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Partnership to End Addiction Staff. (2017). Why you shouldn’t use the word ‘addict’. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids. Resource Document. https://drugfree.org/parent-blog/shouldnt-use-word-addict/. Accessed September 2020.

  25. Paul, G. (2019). Kitchener meth addict stabbed man through cheek into tongue.” The Record, Dec 3, 2019. https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-region/2019/12/03/kitchener-meth-addict-stabbed-man-through-cheek-into-tongue.html. Accessed September 2020.

  26. Paul, G. (2019). Kitchener meth addict stole safe containing cremated remains. The Record, Dec 17, 2019. https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-region/2019/12/17/kitchener-meth-addict-stole-safe-containing-cremated-remains.html. Accessed September 2020.

  27. Paul, G. (2020). Drug addict armed with machete robbed Cambridge pharmacy. The Record, July 2, 2020. https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-region/2020/07/02/drug-addict-armed-with-machete-robbed-cambridge-pharmacy.html. Accessed September 2020.

  28. Paul, G. (2020). Jailing addicts fixes nothing, Kitchener defence lawyers say. The Record, July 10, 2020. https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-region/2020/07/10/jailing-addicts-fixes-nothing-kitchener-defence-lawyers-say.html. Accessed September 2020.

  29. Ralston, M. (2014). The end of the addict. Drug Policy Alliance. Blog post. http://www.drugpolicy.org/blog/end-addict. Accessed September 2020.

  30. Region of Waterloo Public Health and Emergency Services. (2018). Waterloo Region Opioid Response Plan Update. Waterloo Region Crime Prevention Council. Resource document. http://preventingcrime.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Public-Health-Waterloo-Region-Opioid-Response-Plan-Update.pdf.

  31. Roe, G. (2005). Harm reduction as paradigm: Is better than bad good enough? The origins of harm reduction. Critical Public Health, 15(3), 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shatterproof. (2020). Stigma-reducing language. Shatterproof. Resource document. https://www.shatterproof.org/about-addiction/stigma/stigma-reducing-language. Accessed September 2020.

  33. Souleymanov, R., & Allman, D. (2015). Articulating connections between the harm-reduction paradigm and the marginalisation of people who use illicit drugs. British Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv067.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Sveinsdóttir, A. K. (2013). The social construction of human kinds. Hypatia, 28(4), 716–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sveinsdóttir, A. K. (2015). Social construction. Philosophy Compass, 10(12), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sveinsdóttir, A. K. (2017). Social kinds. In M. Jankovic & K. Ludwig (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality (pp. 290–299). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Szalavitz, M. (2017). It’s time to stop calling people ‘addicts’. Tonic. https://tonic.vice.com/en_us/article/599yg5/its-time-to-stop-calling-people-addicts. Accessed September 2020.

  38. Szalavitz, M. (2017). Why we should say someone is a ‘person with an addiction,’ not an addict. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/06/11/531931490/change-from-addict-to-person-with-an-addiction-is-long-overdue. Accessed September 2020.

  39. Toward the Heart. (n.d.). Reducing Stigma. BCCDC Harm Reduction Services. Resource document. https://towardtheheart.com/reducing-stigma. Accessed September 2020.

  40. U.K. Rehab. (2013). Heroin users usually do not fit the junkie stereotype. U.K. Rehab Blog. Blog post. https://www.uk-rehab.com/blog/heroin-users-usually-do-not-fit-the-junkie-stereotype/.

  41. Volkow, N. D. (2020). Fighting back against the stigma of addiction. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fighting-back-against-the-stigma-of-addiction/. Accessed September 2020.

  42. Wild, C. T., et al. (2019). Media coverage of harm reduction, 2000-2016: A content analysis of tone, topics, and interventions in Canadian print news. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilson, M. (2018). An addict dies in a school restroom. He was a teacher. The New York Times, January 26, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/26/nyregion/heroin-opioids-death-teacher-bronx-azimi-addict.html. Accessed February 2019.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the funding provided by the Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship. I am grateful to be a Vanier Scholar. I am also grateful to my two anonymous reviewers who provided thoughtful suggestions. Finally, I would especially like to thank Shannon Dea, who offered me advice on earlier versions of this paper and encouraged me to publish it.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet Jones.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, J. What Do We Mean When We Call Someone a Drug Addict?. Health Care Anal 28, 391–403 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-020-00410-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-020-00410-0

Keywords

Navigation