Abstract
Prior researches have highlighted challenges and variations arising from the requirements of research ethics committees and ethics governance systems across diverse research fields. This emphasizes the need to investigate how universities convey and implement research ethical practices. Research ethics plays a pivotal role in guiding the integration of ethical principles throughout all stages of research starting from its inception and planning to its completion and the dissemination of results. These practices encompass a range of considerations, reviews, guidelines, and processes aimed at safeguarding the rights, dignity, health, safety, and privacy of research participants. Using the content analysis technique, this paper aims to analyse research ethical practices information on universities’ websites from three developed countries and developing countries respectively using the isomorphism conception. The findings suggest that the coercive, normative, and mimetic isomorphic pressures explain the research ethics governance practices. The ethical practices information was disclosed more on university websites of the developed countries. Suggestions to improve the university’s research ethics governance system for the post-COVID-19 era were provided in the paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad, D. H. A., Joseph, C., & Said, R. (2021). Disclosure of accountability practices on websites of Malaysian city councils. Management and Accounting Review Journal, 20(1), 85–112.
Allen, G. (2008). Getting beyond form filling: The role of institutional governance in human research ethics. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6, 105–116.
Anafinova, S. (2020). The role of rankings in higher education policy: Coercive and normative isomorphism in Kazakhstani higher education. International Journal of Educational Development, 78, 102246.
Canario Guzmán, J. A., Orlich, J., Mendizábal-Cabrera, R., Ying, A., Vergès, C., Espinoza, E., et al. (2022). Strengthening research ethics governance and regulatory oversight in Central America and the Dominican Republic in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Health Research Policy and Systems, 20(1), 1–15.
Chou, C., Lee, I. J., & Fudano, J. (2022). The present situation of and challenges in research ethics and integrity promotion: Experiences in East Asia. Accountability in Research, 1–24.
Croucher, G., & Woelert, P. (2015). Institutional isomorphism and the creation of the unified national system of higher education in Australia: An empirical analysis. Higher Education, 71, 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9914-6
Davies, S. E. (2020). The introduction of research ethics review procedures at a university in South Africa: Review outcomes of a social science research ethics committee. Research Ethics, 16(1–2), 1–26.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Ferguson, K., Masur, S., Olson, L., Ramirez, J., Robyn, E., & Schmaling, K. (2007). Enhancing the culture of research ethics on university campuses. Journal of Academic Ethics, 5, 189–198.
Gaillard, J. C., & Peek, L. (2019). Disaster-zone research needs a code of conduct. Nature, 575(7783), 440–442.
Guillemin, M., Gillam, L., Rosenthal, D., & Bolitho, A. (2012). Human research ethics committee: Examining their roles and practices. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(3), 38–49.
Joseph, C., Gunawan, J., Madi, N., Janggu, T., Rahmat, M., & Mohamed, N. (2019). Realising sustainable development goals via online integrity framework disclosure: Evidence from Malaysian and Indonesian local authorities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 112–122.
Joseph, C., & Said, R. (2020). The evolution of institutional environments in the development of corporate social responsibility in selected ASEAN countries. In D. Crowther & S. Seifi (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of corporate social responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22438-7_29-1
Kilic, N. C., & Ataman, G. (2022), “Isomorphism in higher education institutions: An examination of Mission statements of universities in Turkey”, VI International European conference on interdisciplinary scientific research, Bükreş, Romanya, August 2022.
Lindorff, M. (2010). Ethics, ethical human research and human research ethics committee. Australian Universities’ Review, 52(1), 51–59.
Makola, Z., & Ntoyanto-Tyatyantsi, N. (2023). Post graduate students’ experiences with research ethics: A south African perspective. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 18(4), 208–217.
Nho, H. (2016). Research ethics education in Korea for overcoming culture and value system differences. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(4), 1–11.
Page, S. A., & Nyeboer, J. (2017). Improving the process of research ethics review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2, 14.
Scott, A. M., Bryant, E. A., Byrne, J. A., Taylor, N., & Barnett, A. G. (2021). “No country bureaucratised its way to excellence”: A content analysis of comments on a petition to streamline Australian research ethics and governance processes. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(1–2, 102), –113.
Stoesz, B. M., & Eaton, S. E. (2022). Academic integrity policies of publicly funded universities in western Canada. Educational Policy, 36(6), 1529–1548.
Sorin, V. D., Dîrja, M., Rotaru, C. M. S., & Giurgiuman, T. (2021). Research Ethics In Universities. Ethics And Deontology Journal, 1(01), 52–59.
Sivasubramaniam, S., Dlabolová, D. H., Kralikova, V., & Khan, Z. R. (2021). Assisting you to advance with ethics in research: an introduction to ethical , governance and application procedures. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(14), 1–18.
Vadeboncoeur, C., Townsend, N., Foster, C., & Sheehan, M. (2016). Variation in university research ethics review: Reflections following an inter-university study in England. Research Ethics, 12(4), 217–233.
Yip, C., Han, N. L. R., & Sng, B. L. (2016). Legal and ethical issues in research. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 60(9), 684.
Zoljarga, D. (2020). A case study of higher education in Mongolia: Institutional isomorphism. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 107–115.
Acknowledgements
This manuscript has no additional acknowledgements to make.
Funding
No funding was required for preparation or submission of this manuscript. The submission funding was secured through an institution-based education fund by the senior lead authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CJ authored the primary draft and subsequent edited versions of the manuscript, created the data and figures, interpreted the data and provided significant idea contribution to the manuscript. R and SN significant edits of the manuscript, supported data interpretation and provided significant contribution of ideas. CJ and R were the main senior authors, provided the primary idea for the manuscript, and provided significant idea contribution/ edits for the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Financial or Non-financial Interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Joseph, C., Norizan, S. & Rahmawati An Analysis of Research Ethical Practices Information on Universities’ Websites in Developing and Developed Countries. J Acad Ethics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09496-2
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09496-2