Skip to main content
Log in

Metamathematical Properties of a Constructive Multi-typed Theory

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes an axiomatic theory BT, which is a suitable formal theory for developing constructive mathematics, due to its expressive language with countable number of set types and its constructive properties such as the existence and disjunction properties, and consistency with the formal Church thesis. BT has a predicative comprehension axiom and usual combinatorial operations. BT has intuitionistic logic and is consistent with classical logic. BT is mutually interpretable with a so called theory of arithmetical truth PATr and with a second-order arithmetic SA that contains infinitely many sorts of sets of natural numbers. We compare BT with some standard second-order arithmetics and investigate the proof-theoretical strengths of fragments of BT, PATr and SA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beeson, M., Some relations between classical and constructive mathematics, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 43(2):228–246, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beeson, M., A type-free Gödel interpretation, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 43(2):213–227, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beeson, M., Foundations of Constructive Mathematics. Metamathematical Studies, Springer, Berlin, 1985.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Bishop, E., Foundations of Constructive Analysis, Ishi Press International, New York, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bishop, E., and D. Bridges, Constructive Analysis, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011.

  6. Dragalin, A. G., Mathematical Intuitionism. Introduction to Proof Theory, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feferman, S., A language and axioms for explicit mathematics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 450:87–139, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Feferman, S., Constructive theories of functions and classes, Logic Colloquium 78 (Mons) 450:159–224, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman, H., The consistency of classical set theory relative to a set theory with intuitionistic logic, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 38(2):315–319, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman, H., Subsystems of set theory and analysis, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1967.

  11. Gordeev, L., Proof-theoretic analysis: weak systems of functions and classes, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 38(1):1–121, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kachapova, F., Interpretation of constructive multi-typed theory in the theory of arithmetical truth, Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics 36(4):332–341, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kachapova, F., Realizability and existence property of a constructive set theory with types, Proceedings of the 13th Asian Logic Conference 2015, pp. 136–155.

  14. Kashapova, F., Isolation of classes of constructively derivable theorems in a many-sorted intuitionistic set theory equivalent to a second-order arithmetic, Doklady Academii Nauk 29(3):583–587, 1984.

  15. Mendelson, E., Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simpson, S.G., Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farida Kachapova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kachapova, F. Metamathematical Properties of a Constructive Multi-typed Theory. Stud Logica 105, 587–610 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-016-9701-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-016-9701-0

Keywords

Navigation