Abstract
The proposed system for coping negative emotions arising during the learning process is considered as an embedded part of the complex intelligent learning system realized in a digital environment. By applying data-driven procedures on the current and retrospective data the main didactic-based stimuli provoking emotion generation are identified. They are examined as dominant negative emotions in the context of learning. Due to the presence of strong internal and output interconnections between teaching and emotional states, an intelligent decoupling multidimensional control scheme is accepted to overcome the lack of sample effective independent control actions that separately affect the states of learning and emotions. To avoid existing drawbacks in emotion-focused partial control, an approach with integrating emotions with a low-dimensional representation is accepted. Two-stage procedure is proposed to compensate the negative impact of emotions on the learning process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3rd ed. Pearson (2009)
Negnevitsky, M.: Artificial Intelligence: A Guide to Intelligent Systems, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, Canada (2014)
Baesens, B.: Analytics in a Big Data World. Wiley, New York (2014)
Berthold, M., Hand, D.: Intelligent Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Springer, Berlin (2007)
Kordon, A.K.: Applying Data Science: How to Create Value with Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Berlin (2020)
McKinsey: Global Institute, Artificial Intelligence: The Next Digital Frontier? (2017)
Pascual, D.: Artificial Intelligence Tools: Decision Support Systems in Conditions Monitoring and Diagnosis. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)
Chen, N., Christensen, L., Gallagher, K., Mate, R., Rafert, G.: Global Economic Impacts Associated with Artificial Intelligence. Study Analysis Group, Boston, MA, vol. 25 (2016)
Andreu-Perez, J., Poon, C.C., Merrifield, R.D., Wong, S.T., Yang, G.-Z.: Big Data for Health. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 19, 1193–1208 (2015)
Kober, J., Bagnell, J.A., Peters, J.: Reinforcement learning in robotics: a survey. Int. J. Robot. Res. 32, 1238–1274 (2013)
Sobh, T., Elleithy, K. (eds.): Emerging Trends in Computing, Informatics, Systems Sciences, and Engineering. Springer, Berlin (2013)
IEEE Computer Society’s Top 12 Technology Trends for 2020, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/300971863.html.
Crawley, E.F., Hosoi, A., Mitra, A.: Redesigning undergraduate engineering education at MIT—the new engineering education transformation (NEET) initiative. American Society for Engineering Education (2018)
Graham, R.: The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education. Survey Report commissioned by MIT, Phase I 2016, Phase II (2018)
Natarajan, R. (ed.): Proceedings of the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education (ICTIEE 2014). Springer, Berlin (2014)
Dahdouh, K., Dakkak, A., Oughdir, L., Ibriz, A.: Improving Online Education Using Big Data Technologies (2020). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88463
Vaessen, M., van der Heijden, K., de Gelder, B.: Decoding of emotion expression in the face, body and voice reveals sensory modality specific representations. bioRxiv preprint (2019)
Kleinjohann, B.: Fuzzy emotion recognition in natural speech. In: IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN 2005), pp. 317–322 (2005)
Yadegaridehkordi, E., Noor, N.F.B.M., Ayub, M.N.B., Affal, H.B., Hussin, N.B.: Affective computing in education: a systematic review and future research. Comput. Educ. 42, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103649
Troussas, C., Virvou, M.: Affective computing and motivation in educational contexts: data pre-processing and ensemble learning. In: Advances in Social Networking-Based Learning, Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol. 181. Springer, Berlin (2020)
Hernández, Y., Sucar, L.E., Arroyo-Figueroa, G.: Building an affective model for intelligent tutoring systems with base on teachers’ expertise. In: Gelbukh, A., Morales, E.F. (eds.) MICAI 2008: Advances in Artificial Intelligence MICAI 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5317. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Han, J., Zhao, W., Jiang, Q., Oubibi, M., Hu, X.: Intelligent tutoring system trends 2006–2018: a literature review. In: 2019 Eighth International Conference on Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), Biloxi, MS, USA, pp. 153–159 (2019)
Kulik, J.A., Fletcher, J.D.: Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems—a meta-analytic review. Rev. Educ. Res. (2015). https://doi.org/10.0132/0034654315581420
Pratap, M.: How Learning Management System Revolutionizing the Education Sector (2020). https://hackernoon.com/qor32bx
Popenici, S., Kerr, S.: Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Res. Practice Technol. Enhanced Learn. 12(1), 1–13 (2017)
Saltan, F.: The new generation of interactive whiteboards: how students perceive and conceptualize?. Participatory Educ. Res. 6(2), 93–102 (2019)
van Alten, D.C.D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., Kester, L.: Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Educ. Res. Rev. 28, 1–18 (2019)
Alexander, P.A., Pekrun, R., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (eds.) International Handbook of Emotions in Education. Routledge, London (2014)
Faria, R., Almeida, A., Martins, C., Gonçalves, R., Figueiredo, L.: Including emotion in learning process. In: Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 27–32. Springer, Berlin (2015)
Kuppens, P., Oravecz, Z., Tuerlinckx, F.: feelings change: accounting for individual differences in the temporal dynamics of affect. J. Personal. Social Psychol. 99(6), 1042–1060 (2010)
Hamann, S., Canli, T.: Individual differences in emotion processing. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 233–238 (2004)
Vishkin, A., Hasson, Y., Millgram, Y., Tamir, M.: One size does not fit all: tailoring cognitive reappraisal to different emotions. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Society for Personality and Social Psychology, pp. 1–16 (2019)
Lewis, M.D.: Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling. Behav. Brain Sci. 28(2), 169–194 (2005)
D’ Mello, S., Graesser, A.: The half-life of cognitive-affective states during complex learning. Cogn. Emotion (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.613668
Ekman, P.: What scientists who study emotion agree about. Persp. Psychol. Sci. 11, 31–34 (2016)
Tiedens, L.Z., Linton, S.: Judgment under Emotional Certainty and Uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81, 973–988 (2001)
Feidakis, M., Daradoumis, T., Caballe, S.: Emotion measurement in intelligent tutoring systems: what, when and how to measure? In: Third International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, pp. 807–813 (2011)
D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., Graesser, A.: Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learn. Instr. 29, 153–170 (2014)
Colombo, D., Fernandez-Alvarez, J., Palacios, A.G., Cipresso, P., Bottela, G., Riva, G.: New technologies for the understanding, assessment and intervention of emotion regulation. Front. Psychol. 10(12) (2019)
Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Burns, W.J., Erlandsson, A., Koppel, L., Eand, A.: et al.: The arithmetic of emotion: integration of incidental and integral affect in judgments and decisions. Front. Psychol. 7(325) (2016)
Feidakis, M.: A review of emotion-aware systems for e-learning in virtual environments in formative assessment. In: Learning Data Analytics and Gamification. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2016)
Cowena, A.S., Keltnera, D.: Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients. PNAS, USA, Published online 5 Sept 2017
Harley, J.M., Pekrun, R., Taxer, J.L., Gross, J.J.: Emotion regulation in achievement situations: an integrated model. Educ. Psychol. 54(2), 106–126 (2019)
Kort, B., Reilly, R.: Analytical models of emotions, learning and relationships: towards an affect-sensitive cognitive machine. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Simulation (VWSim), San Antonio, Texas (2002)
Ibrahimoglu, N., Unaldi, I., Samancioglu, M., Baglibel, M.: The relationship between personality traits and learning styles: a cluster analysis. Asian J. Manage. Sci. Educ. 93–108 (2013)
Lerner, J.S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., Kassam, K.: Emotion and decision making. Ann Rev. Psychol. (2014)
Gross, J.J.: Emotion regulation: current Status and future prospects. Psychol. Inq. 26, 1–26 (2015)
Esau, N., Kleinjohann, L., Kleinjohann, B.: An adaptive fuzzy emotion model for emotion recognition. In: Proceedings of the 4-th European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology, Barcelona, pp. 73–78 (2005)
Zhou, R., Feng, J., Chang, H., Zhou, Y.: fuzzification of attribute information granules and its formal reasoning model. CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol. 2(3), 116–125 (2017)
Damasio, A.R., Grabowski, T.J., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Ponto, L.L., Parvizi, J., et al.: Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1049–1056 (2000)
Ozawa, S., Matsuda, G., Hiraki, K.: Negative emotion modulates prefrontal cortex activity during a working memory task: a NIRS study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8(46) (2014)
Kahneman, D., Riis, J.: Living, and thinking about it: two perspectives on life. In: Kahneman, D., Riis, J.: The Science of Well-Being (2005). books.google.com
Shafir, R., Thiruchselvam, R., Suri, G., Gross, J.J., Sheppes, G.: Neural processing of emotional-intensity predicts emotion regulation choice. Social Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 1863–1871 (2016)
Wortha, F., Azevedo, R., Taub, M., Narciss, S.: Multiple negative emotions during learning with digital learning environments—evidence on their detrimental effect on learning from two methodological approaches. Front. Psychol. 10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02678
Thagard, P., Nerb, J.: Emotional gestalts: appraisal, change, and the dynamics of affect personality and social psychology review. 6(4), 274–282 (2002)
Gregoire, M.: Is it a challenge or a threat? a dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 15(2) (2003)
Pekrun, R., Erenzel, A., Goetz, T., Perry, R.: The control-value theory of achievement emotions: an integrative approach to emotions in education. In: Schutz, P., Pekrun, R. (eds.) Emotion in Education, pp. 13–36. Academic Press, Amsterdam (2007)
Lange, J., Dalege, J., Borsboom, D., van Kleef, G.A., Fischer, A.H.: Toward an integrative psychometric model of emotions. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 15(2), 444–468
Seta, J.J., Haire, A., Seta, C.E.: Averaging and summation: positivity and choice as a function of the number and affective intensity of life events. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44, 173–186 (2008)
Tsiourti, C., Weiss, A., Wac, K., et al.: Multimodal integration of emotional signals from voice, body, and context: effects of congruence on emotion recognition and attitudes towards robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 11, 555–573 (2019)
Byun, S.-W., Lee, S.-P.: Human emotion recognition based on the weighted integration method using image sequences and acoustic features. Multimedia Tools Appl. 9 (2020)
Zhou, R., Feng, J., Chang, H., Zhou, Y.: Fuzzification of attribute information granules and its formal reasoning model. CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol. 2(3), 116–125
Liliana, D.Y., Basaruddin, T., Widyanto, M.R., Oriza, I.I.D.: Fuzzy emotion: a natural approach to automatic facial expression recognition from psychological perspective using fuzzy system (2019)
Ray, T., Kordon, A., Wells, C.: Applied Data Mining in Forecasting. SAS Institute (2012)
Roth, G., Vansteenkiste, R., Ryan, M.: Integrative Emotion Regulation: Process and Development from a Self-determination Theory Perspective, pp. 1–12. Development and Psychopathology, Cambridge University Press (2019)
Roth, G., Shahar, B.H., Zohar-Shefer, Y., Benita, M., Moed, A., Bibi, U., Ryan, R.M.: Benefits of emotional integration and costs of emotional distancing. J. Pers. 86, 919–934 (2018)
Melo, F.R., Flores, E.L., Carvalho, S.D.: Multilevel content's structure for personalization in conexionist intelligent tutor systems. In: 8th International Conference on Information Systems and Technology Mmanagement, 2011, Proceedings of 8th CONTECSI, TECSI, EAC FEA USP (2011)
Reigeluth, C.M., Aslan, S., Chen, Z., et al.: Personalized integrated educational system: technology functions for the learner-centered paradigm of education. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 53(3), 459–496
Zhou, G., Azizsoltani, H., Ausin, M.S., Barnes, T., Chi, M.: Hierarchical reinforcement learning for pedagogical policy induction. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R.R. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education AIED 2019, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 625. Springer, Berlin (2019)
Frijda, N.H.: Emotions, individual differences and time course: reflections. Cogn. Emotion 23(7), 1444–1461 (2009)
Jevsikova, T., Berniukevicius, E., Kurilovas, E.: Application of resource description framework to personalise learning: systematical review and methodology. Inf. Educ. 16(1), 61–82 (2017)
Connor, C.M.: Using technology and assessment to personalize instruction: preventing reading problems. Prev. Sci. 20(1), 89–99 (2019)
Stewart, C.: Learning analytics: shifting from theory to practice. J. Empower Teach. Excel l(1) (2017)
Kaltenborn, R., Hadjiski, M., Koynov, S.: Intelligent control of negative emotions in a computer-based learning system. In: Proceedings of 2020 IEEE 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Bulgaria, Varna, pp. 119–124, 28–30 Aug 2020
Kaltenborn, R.: Embedding the assessment of emotion in the learning process with ai-driven technologies. In: Petrov, V., Anderson, K. (eds.) Traditional Learning Theories, Process Philosophy and AI, pp. 145–166. Les Editions Chromatica (2019)
Hadjiski, M., Kaltenborn, R.: Learnability as an indicator for planning and control of learning systems. Inform. Technol. Control 4 (2020)
Chang, M., D’Anjello, G., Gaeta, M., Orciuoli, F., Sampson, D., Simonelli, C.: Building ontology-driven tutoring models for intelligent tutoring systems using data mining. IEEE Access 8, 48151–48162 (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaltenborn, R., Hadjiski, M., Koynov, S. (2022). Stimuli-Based Control of Negative Emotions in a Digital Learning Environment. In: Sgurev, V., Jotsov, V., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 379. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78124-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78124-8_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78123-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78124-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)