Skip to main content
Log in

Ronald Dworkin on Abortion and Assisted Suicide

  • Published:
The Journal of Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the first part of this article, I raisequestions about Dworkin's theory of theintrinsic value of life and about the adequacyof his proposal to understand abortion in termsof different ways of valuing life. In thesecond part of the article, I consider hisargument in ``The Philosophers' Brief on AssistedSuicide'', which claims that the distinctionbetween killing and letting die is morallyirrelevant, the distinction between intendingand foreseeing death can be morally relevantbut is not always so. I argue that thekilling/letting die distinction can be relevantin the context of assisted suicide, but alsoshow when it is not. Then I consider why theintention/foresight distinction can be morallyirrelevant and conclude by presenting analternative argument for physician-assistedsuicide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kamm, F. Ronald Dworkin on Abortion and Assisted Suicide. The Journal of Ethics 5, 221–240 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012755208057

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012755208057

Navigation