Skip to main content
Log in

Managing Dual Use Technology: It Takes Two to Tango

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Like nuclear energy, most technologies could have dual use—for health and well being and disaster and terror. Some research publications have brought to the forefront the tragic consequences of the latter potential through their possible use. Monitoring life science research and development (R&D) to prevent possible misuse is a challenging task globally, more so in developing economies like India, which are emerging as major biotech hubs. As a signatory to the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, India has put in motion a process of evolving a series of measures to manage dual-use technology. The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) has taken a lead in drafting model codes of conduct, ethics and practice for use by other S&T agencies to tailor them as per their requirements. Taking cue from the discussions held by the editors of the various medical and science journals in the developed world, the Indian Journal of Medical Research, the official publication of the ICMR, is working on policy and uniform practice of publication of dual-use research results. The Government of India too has promulgated legal provisions to minimize the risks of misuse of technology, like the Weapons of Mass Destruction Act. Clearly, no single agency would be able to manage the dual-use of technology effectively. Multiple agencies have to come together to work in tandem for effective implementation of various measure and also like Janus, ensure that they are neither too restrictive nor intrusive to discourage the development of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jackson, R. J., Ramsay, A. J., Christensen, C. D., Beaton, S., Hall, D. F., & Ramshaw, I. A. (2001). Expression of mouse interleukin-4 by a recombinant ectromelia virus suppresses cytolytic lymphocyte responses and overcomes genetic resistance to mousepox. Journal of Virology, 75, 1205–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wein, L. M., & Liu, Y. (2005). Analyzing a bioterror attack on the food supply: The case of botulinum toxin in milk. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America, 102, 9984–9989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gamblin, S. J., Haire, L. F., Russel, R. J., Stevens, D. J., Xiao, B., & Ha, Y., et al. (2004). The structure and receptor binding properties of the 1918 influenza hemagglutinin. Science, 303, 838–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cello, J., Paul, A. V., & Wimmer, E. (2002). Chemical synthesis of poliovirus cDNA: Generation of infectious virus in the absence of natural template. Science, 297, 1016–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Annas, G. J. (2006). Bioterror and ‘Bioart’—a plague o both your houses. New England Journal of Medicine, 354, 2715–2720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. WHO. (2005). Life science research: Opportunities and risks for public health. http://www.who.int/csr/bioriskreduction/lifescience-project/en/index.html.

  7. Frew, S. H., Rezaie, R., Sammut, S. M., Ray, M., Daar, A. S., & Singer, P. A. (2007). India’s health biotech sector at crossroads. Nature Biotechnology, 25, 403–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jayaraman, K. I. S. (2005). Biotech boom. Nature, 436, 480–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Atlas, R., Campbell, P., Cozzarelli, N. R., Curfman, G., Enquist, L., & Fink, G., et al. (2003). Journal editors and authors group. Statement on the consideration of biodefense and biosecurity. Nature, 421, 771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Policy guidelines of the publications board of the ASM in the handling of manuscripts dealing with microbiological sensitive issues. Journal of American Society of Microbiology. Available on website: http://www.journals.asm.org.

  11. Kant, L. (2006). Public no evil: Should editors publish research that could have dual use? Indian Journal of Medical Research, 123, 99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Indian Initiatives Code of conduct for scientists: Prepared by India. Inter Review Conference Meetings. Working Paper at the Meeting of Experts, 13–24 June 2005. BWC/MSP/2005/MX/WP.23. Available on website: http://www.opbw.org.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. T. Mourya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kant, L., Mourya, D.T. Managing Dual Use Technology: It Takes Two to Tango. Sci Eng Ethics 16, 77–83 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9062-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9062-9

Keywords

Navigation