Skip to main content
Log in

Sātmaka, Nairātmya, and A-Nairātmya: Dharmakīrti’s Counter-Argument Against the Proof of Ātman

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ātman (soul) and Nairātmya (no soul) are, for the Brahmanical schools and the Buddhists respectively, equally fundamental tenets which neither side can concede to the other. Among the 16 formulations presented by Uddyotakara, the fifteenth, which is a proof of Ātman and is originally an indirect proof (avīta/āvīta), is presented in a prasaṅga-style, and contains double negation (na nairātmyam) in the thesis. However, it is perhaps Dharmakīrti who first transformed it into a normal style (sātmakam). He is well aware of the law of excluded middle, and insisits that the negation is paryudāsa. On the Nyāya side, Uddyotakara at least seems to be unaware of the law of the logical equivalence of contraposition concerning pervasion (vyāpti). After Uddyotakara, however, Vyoman (Vyomaśiva), Bhāsarvajña and Vācaspatimiśra, all seem to be well aware of it. Dharmakīrti, in his conter-argument against the proof of ātman, discusses the negative expressions ‘‘nairātmya” and ‘‘a-nairātmya” Dharmakīrti here uses two logical arguments skillfully and tactically. As a critic of both the authenticity of the Veda and the existence of ātman, he insists on the theory of dichotomy and the equivalence of anvaya and vyatireka, whereas as an apologist he denies the application of these theories to the relation between the existence of ātman and the concept of nairātmya, because for him as a Buddhist the latter is not a negative but essentially positive state of affairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Abbreviations and Primary Sources

  • NBhū Nyāyabhūṣaṇam of Bhāsarvajña, śrīmadācāryabhāsarvajñaprantasya nyāyasārasya svopajñaṃvyākhyānaṃ. Ed. Yogīndrānanda ṣadarśana-’s anagranthamālā, 1968.

  • NV1 Nyāyavārttikam, a Gloss on Vātsyāyana’s Commentary of the Nyāya-Aphorisms, Ed. Vindhyeśvarī Prasād Dvivedin, Bibliotheca Indica 133, Calcutta, 1887–1916. Rep. with an Introduction by R. C. Pandeya, & Eastern Book Linkers, Delhi, 1986.

  • NV2 Nyāyavārttikam with Nyāyavārttikasya bhūmikā, Ed. Vindhyeśvarī prasāda Dvivedin, Kāshīsaṃskṛt Series, 1916.

  • NV3 NV in Nyāyadarśanam with Vātsyāyana’s Bhāṣya, Uddyotakara’s Vārttika, Vācaspati Miśra’s Tātparyaṭīkā, and Viśvanātha’s Vṛtti, Ed. Taranatha Nyaya-Tarkatirtha, Amarendramohan Tarkatirtha, Calcutta Sanskrit Series Nos. 18, 29, 1936, 1944. Rep. Rinsen Book Co. 1982.

  • NV4 NV in Nyāyadarśana of Gautama, with the Bhāṣya of Vātsyāyana, the Vārttika of Uddyotakara, the Tātparyaṭīkā of Vācaspati and the Pariśuddhi of Udayana, Vol. 1. Chap. 1, Ed. Anantalal Thakur, Mithila Insūtitute Series, Ancient Text No. 20, 1967.

  • NV5 NV in Nyāya bhāṣyavārttika of Bhāradvāja Uddyotakara, Ed. Anantalal Thakur. Nyāya caturgranthikā Vol. 2, New Delhi, 1997.

  • NVTṬ Nyāyavārttikatātparyaṭīkā of Vācaspatimiśra. See NV3.

  • PVBh Pramāṇavārttikabhāshyam or Vārttikālaṅkāraḥ of Prajñākaragupta, (Being a commentary on Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇavārttikam), Ed. Rahula Sāṅkṛtyāyana, Patna, 1953.

  • PVin Manuscript (Photo Copy) in WIEN.

  • PVSV1 The Pramāṇavārttikasvavṛtti of Dharmakīrti, The first chapter with the Autocommentary, Text and Critical Notes, Ed. Raniero Gnoli, Serie Orientale Roma XXIII, Roma, 1960.

  • PVSV2 Svārthānumāna-Pariccheda by Dharmakirti, Hindu Vidhvavidyalaya Nepal Rajya Sanskrit Series, Vol. 2. Ed. D. Malvaniya, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 1959.

  • PVV1 Pramāṇavārttikavṛtti of Manorathanandin, Ed. Rahula Sāṅkṛtyāyana, Patna, 1937.

  • PVV2 Pramāṇavārttika of Acharya Dharmakirtti, With the Commentary ‘Vritti’ of Acharya Manorathanandin, Ed. Swami Dwarikadas Shastri, BBS Vol. 3, Varanasi. 1968.

  • Vyom1 Praśastapādabhāṣyam of Praśasta Devāchārya with Commentaries (up to Dravya) Sūkti by Jagadiśa Tarkālaṅkāra, Setu by Padmanābha Miśra and Vyomavatī by Vyomaśivāchārya (to the end), Ed. M. M.Gopīnāth Kavirāj, Chowkhambha Sanskrit Series No. 61, Benares, 1924–31, Second Ed. 1983.

  • Vyom2 Vyomavatī of Vyomaśivācārya, Ed. Gaurinath Saatri, M.M. Śivakumāraśāstri Granthamālā, Vol. 6, Varanasi, 1983.

  • TBV Tattvabodhavidhāyinī, in Saṃmatitarkaprakaraṇam. Saṃmatitarkaprakaraṇam by Siddhasena Divākara with Abhayadevasūri’s Commentary Tattvabodhavidhāyinī, Ed. Sukhlāl Saṅgavi and Becardās Dośi, Gujarāta Purātattvamandira Granthāvalī 10, 16, 18, 19, 21, Ahmedabad, 1924–1931. Rep. Rinsen, Kyoto, 1984.

  • TBhK Tarkabhāṣā of Keśavamiśra with the commentary Tarkabhāṣāprakāśikā of Cinnaṃbhaṭṭa. Ed. D. R. Bhandarkar and Pandit Kedarnath, Sāhityabhūṣaṇa, Bombay Sanskrit and Prakrit Series, LXXXIV, 1937.

  • TSP Tattvasaṇgraha of Ācārya Śāntarakṣita with the commentary ‘‘Pañjikā” of Shri Kamalaśīla. Ed. Swami Dwarikadas Shastri, Bauddha Bharati Series 1, 2. Second Ed. 1981, 1982.

Secondary Sources

  • Franco E. (1999) Avīta and Āvīta. Asiatische Studien, Études Asiatiques LIII 3: 563–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano K. (1999) On anyathānupapatti and avīta/āvīta. In: Katsura S. (eds) Dharmakīrti’s thought and its impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy, Proceedings of the international Dharmakīrti conference, Hiroshima. Wien, Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp 173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano K. (2001) Pariśeṣa Prasaṅga, and Kevalavyatirekin—The logical structure of the proof of Ātman. Journal of Indian Philosophy 29: 405–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kano K. (2011). Dichotomy, antarvyāpti, and dṛṣṭānta, In H. Krasser, H. Lasic, E. Franco & B. Kellner (Eds.), Religion and logic in Buddhist philosophical analysis. Proceedings of the fourth international Dharmakīrti conference, Vienna, August 23–27, 2005 (pp. 231–254). Wien: Verlag der Österreichschen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

  • Katsura S. (2002) Dignāga-ronnrigaku ni okeru pakṣa, sapaakṣa, asapakṣa no imi [The meaning of pakṣa, sapaakṣa, asapakṣa in Dignāga’s logic]. Indotetsugaku-Bukkyogaku 18: 20–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsura, S. (2004). The role of dṛṣṭānta in Dignāga’s logic. In S. Katsura & E. Steinkellner (Eds.), The role of the Example (dṛṣṭānta) in classical Indian logic (pp. 135–173). WSTB 58. Wien: Universität Wien.

  • Ogawa H. (2011). On the term anupalabdih. In H. Krasser, H. Lasic, E. Franco & B. Kellner (Eds.), Religion and logic in Buddhist philosophical analysis. Proceedings of the fourth international Dharmakīrti conference, Vienna, August 23–27, 2005 (pp. 395–405). Wien: Verlag der Österreichschen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

  • Slaje W. (1983) Die Wahrnehmungslehre bei Vyomaśivaḥ. Disseration, Wien

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyo Kano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kano, K. Sātmaka, Nairātmya, and A-Nairātmya: Dharmakīrti’s Counter-Argument Against the Proof of Ātman. J Indian Philos 39, 391–410 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-011-9138-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-011-9138-8

Keywords

Navigation