Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Andersen and the Market for Lemons in Audit Reports

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous accounting ethics research berates auditors for ethical lapses that contribute to the failure of Andersen (e.g., Duska, R.: 2005, Journal of Business Ethics 57, 17–29; Staubus, G.: 2005, Journal of Business Ethics 57, 5–15; however, some of the blame must also fall on regulatory and professional bodies that exist to mitigate auditors’ ethical lapses. In this paper, we consider the ethical and economic context that existed and facilitated Andersen’s failure. Our analysis is grounded in Akerlof’s (1970, Quarterly Journal of Economics August, 488–500) Theory of the Market for Lemons and we characterize the market for audit reports as a market for lemons. Consistent with Akerlof’s model, we consider the appropriateness of the countervailing mechanisms that existed at the time of Andersen’s demise that appeared to have effectively failed in counteracting Andersen’s ethical shortcomings. Finally, we assess the appropriateness of the remedies proposed by the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 (SOA) to ensure that similar ethical lapses will not occur in the future. Our analysis indicates that the SOA regulatory reforms should counteract some of the necessary conditions of the Lemons Model, and thereby mitigate the likelihood of audit failures. However, we contend that the effectiveness of the SOA critically depends upon the focus and attention of the␣Public Companies Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) towards assessing the ethical climates of public accounting firms. Assessments by the PCAOB of public accounting firm’s ethical climate are needed to sufficiently ensure that public accounting firms effectively promote and maintain audit quality in situations where unconscious bias or economic incentives may erode the public accounting firm’s independence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, G. A.: 1970, The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market for Lemons. Quarterly Journal of Economics. August, 488–500.

  • Alexander D., Burns G., Manor R., McRoberts F., Torriero E. A. (2002) Greed Tarnished Golden Reputation. Chicago Tribune 1(September): 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen F. (1984) Reputation and Product Quality. The RAND Journal of Economics 15: 311–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum S. H., Deguire K. J., Lay M. (2005) The Relationship of Ethical Climate to Deviant Workplace Behavior. Corporate Governance 5(4): 43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arens A. A., Elder R. J., Beasley M. S. (2006) Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach, 11th edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers S., Kaplan S. E. (1998) Potential Differences Between Engagement and Risk Review Partners and Their Effect on Client Acceptance Judgments. Accounting Horizons 12(June):139–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucus M. S., Beck-Dudley C. L. (2005) Designing Ethical Organizations: Avoiding the Long-term Negative Effects of Rewards and Punishments. Journal of Business Ethics 56: 355–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M., G. Lowenstein and D. Moore: 2002, Why Good accountants do bad audits. Harvard Business Review, November 2002, Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, Product no. 2217.

  • Bean L. (2004) Rebates: Do the Big Four Need an Ethics Audit? Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance 15(4): 37–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benston G. J., Hartgraves A. L. (2002) Enron: What Happened and What We can learn from it. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 21(Summer): 105–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown L. D, Caylor M. L. (2005) A Temporal Analysis of Quarterly Earnings Thresholds: Propensities and Valuation Consequences. The Accounting Review 80: 423–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M. E., Treviño L. K., Harrison D. A. (2005) Ethical Leadership: A Social Learning Perspective for Construct Development and Testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97: 117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellano, J. F. and S. S.: 2005, Using Cultural Audits to Assess Tone at the Top. The CPA Journal 75(Feb), 6, 8, 10–11.

  • Chaney P., Philipich K. (2002) Shredded Reputation: The Cost of Audit Failure. Journal of Accounting Research 40(4): 1221–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffee, J. C. Jr.: 2002, Understanding Enron: It’s about the Gatekeepers, Stupid. Working Paper, Columbia University. July 20; Working Paper No. 207.

  • Cunningham L. A. (2004) The Appeals and Limits of Internal Controls to Fight Fraud, Terrorism, and other Ills. Journal of Corporation Law 29(2): 267–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond M. (2005) Accounting Education, Research and Practice: After Enron, Where do We go?. European Accounting Review 14(2): 353–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doogar, R., T. Sougiannis, H. Xie.: 2003, The Impairment of Auditor Credibility: Stock Market Evidence from the Enron–Andersen Saga. Working paper, University of Illinois.

  • Duska R. (2005) The Good Auditor—Skeptic or Wealth Accumulator? Ethical Lessons Learned from the Arthur Andersen Debacle. Journal of Business Ethics 57: 17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enron Special Investigation Committee (2002) Report of the Special Investigation Explanation. Commercial Clearing House, Chicago, Ill

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaa J. (1994) Ethical Foundations of Public Accounting. Certified General Accountants’ Research Foundation, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendron Y. (2001) The Difficult Client-acceptance Decision in Canadian Audit Firms: A Field Investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research 18(2): 283–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbins M., Salterio S., Webb A. (2001) Evidence about Auditor-client Management Negotiation Concerning Client’s Financial Reporting. Journal of Accounting Research 39(3): 535–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grojean M. W., Resnick C. J., Dickson M. W., Smith D. B. (2004) Leaders, Values, and Organizational Climate: Examining Leadership Strategies for Establishing an Organizational Climate Regarding Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 55: 223–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(October): 305–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerton R. R., Bodell R. H. (1995) Quality, Choice, and the Economics of Concealment: The Marketing of Lemons. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 29(1): 1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein B., Leffler K. B. (1981) The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance. Journal of Political Economy 89: 615–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knechel, W. R.: 2001. Auditing: Assurance and Risk, 2nd Edition (South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, Ohio)

  • Neice J. M., Trompeter G. M. (2004) The Demise of Arthur Andersen’s One-firm Concept: A Case Study in Corporate Governance. Business and Society Review 109(2): 183–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, S.M.: 2002, The Inevitability of Enron and the Impossibility of “Auditor Independence” under the Current Audit System. Working paper, University of Pittsburgh Law School.

  • Palmrose Z. (1988) An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Audit Service Quality. The Accounting Review 63(1): 55–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Revsine L. (2002) Enron: Sad But Inevitable. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 21(Summer): 137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricchiute D. N. (2003) Auditing and Assurance Services, 7th edition. Southwestern Thomson Learning, Mason, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockness H., Rockness J. (2005) Legislated Ethics: From Enron to Sarbanes–Oxley, the Impact on Corporate America. Journal of Business Ethics 57: 31–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. K., J. Dillard and K. Yuthas: 2005, ‘Accounting’, ‘Profession’, ‘Change’, ‘Image’, ‘Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 58, 159–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson W. P. (1983) Reputation and Product Quality. Bell Journal of Economics 14: 508–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satava D., Caldwell C., Richards L. (2006) Ethics and the Auditing Culture: Rethinking the Foundation of Accounting and Auditing. Journal of Business Ethics 64: 261–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schminke M., Ambrose M. L., Neubaum D. O. (2005) The Effect of Leader Moral Development on Ethical Climate and Employee Attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97: 135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz M. S., Dunfee T. W., Kline M. J. (2005) Tone at the Top: An Ethics Code for Directors. Journal of Business Ethics 58: 79-100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro C. (1982) Consumer Information, Product Quality, and Seller Reputation. Bell Journal of Economics 13: 20–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims R. R. (1992) The Challenge of Ethical Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 11: 505–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims R. R. (2000) Changing an Organization’s Culture under New Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics 25: 65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staubus G. (2005) Ethical Failures in Corporate Financial Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 57: 5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toffler B. L., Reingold J. (2003) Final Accounting: Ambition, Greed and the Fall of Arthur Andersen. Broadway Publishing, New York, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño L. K., Brown M. E. (2004) Managing to be Ethical: Debunking Five Business Ethics Myths. Academy of Management Executive 18(2): 69–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardi Y. (2001) The Effects of Organizational and Ethical Climates on Misconduct at Work. Journal of Business Ethics 29: 325–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verschoor C. C. (2004) The Ethical Climate Barometer. The Internal Auditor 61(Oct): 48–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor B., Cullen J. B. (1987) A Theory and Measure of Ethical Climate in Organizations. In: Frederick W. C., Preston L. (eds) Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, vol. 9. JAI Press Inc., Greenwich, CT., pp. 51–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, C. G.: 2004, Measuring Ethical Climate Risk. The Internal Auditor 61(Dec): 71, 73, 75.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 873606, Tempe, 85282-3606, AZ, U.S.A

    Steven E. Kaplan, Pamela B. Roush & Linda Thorne

Authors
  1. Steven E. Kaplan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pamela B. Roush
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linda Thorne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela B. Roush.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaplan, S.E., Roush, P.B. & Thorne, L. Andersen and the Market for Lemons in Audit Reports. J Bus Ethics 70, 363–373 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9115-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9115-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation