Skip to main content
Log in

Work Values of Turkish and American University Students

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The first aim of this paper was to investigate how the traditional Protestant work ethic (PWE) and more contemporary work values (i.e., masculine, feminine, and entrepreneurship values) were related to one another, and differed across genders and two cultural contexts, namely Turkey and the U.S. The second aim was to elucidate the role of religiosity in PWE among the two cultural groups. Two hundred and sixty six American and 211 Turkish university students participated in this questionnaire study. The analyses examining cross-cultural differences revealed that Turkish university students reported greater scores in the PWE and all contemporary work values as compared to their American counterparts. For the Turkish sample, there were no gender-related differences in the PWE, whereas in the U.S. sample, men reported greater PWE scores than did women. With regard to gender differences in contemporary work values, our results showed that gender groups differed in feminine and entrepreneurship values in both cultural contexts; men emphasized femininity and entrepreneurship more than women in Turkey but the reverse was true in the U.S. Correlations between contemporary work values and the PWE illustrated that the PWE is associated with entrepreneurship and masculine values in both cultural contexts and with feminine values in the Turkish context. Finally, our results regarding the role of religiosity in PWE indicated that highly religious participants reported greater PWE scores than the less religious ones regardless of culture. Findings are discussed with reference both to differences in the two socio-cultural contexts and to recent change in the social structure of Turkish society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Aldemir C., Arbak T., Özmen Ö. N. T. (2003) Türkiye’de İşgÖrme Anlayışı Tanımı ve Boyutları (The Understanding of Working in Turkey, Its Definition and Dimensions). YÖnetim Araştırmaları Dergisi 3–1:5–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali A. (1988). Scaling an Islamic Work Ethic. Journal of Social Psychology 128(5):575–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arda, B.: 1993, ‹Tıp Öğrencilerinin Meslek Seçme Motivasyonları ve Değer Sistemleri Konusunda Bir Durum Değerlendirmesi (A Case Study on Motivational Factors in Selecting Professioan Among Medical Students and Their Value System)’, in R. Bayraktar and İ. Dağ (eds.), VII: Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi (22–25 Eylül 1992) Bilimsel çalışmalar El Kitabı, s. 59–65, Ankara

  • Arslan, M.: 1999, ‹A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the␣Work Ethic of Protestant Catholic and Muslim Managers’, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Leeds University

  • Arslan M. (2000) A Cross-Cultural Comparison of British and Turkish Managers in Terms of Protestant Work Ethic Characteristics. Business Ethics: A European Review 9(1):13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan M. (2001) The Work Ethic Values of Protestant British, Catholic Irish and Muslim Turkish Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 31:321–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atieh M. J., Brief A. P., Vollrath D. A. (1987) The Protestant Work Ethic-Conservatism Paradox: Beliefs and Values in Work and Life. Personality and Individual Differences 8:577–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aycan Z., Fikret-Paşa S. (2003) Career Choices, Job Selection Criteria, and Leadership Preferences in a Transitional Nation: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Career Development 30:129–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks R. (1998) The Protestant Work Ethic. Faith in Business Quarterly 2(2):5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Başaran F. (1992) The University Students Value Preferences. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih Coğrafya FakÜltesi Araştırma Dergisi 14:13–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Beit-Hallahmi B. (1979) Personal and Social Components of the Protestant Ethic. Journal of Social Psychology 109(2):263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau G., Ryan J. (1997) On Measuring Work Ethic: A Neglected Work Commitment Facet. Journal of Vocational Behavior 51:435–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum U., Dudley L. (2001) Religion and Economic Growth, was Weber Right. Journal of Evolutionary, Economics 11:207–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chushmir L. H., Koberg C. S. (1988) Religion and Attitudes Toward Work. A New Look at an Old Question. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 9(3):251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J. (1985) Protestant ethics and Status Attainment. Sociological Analysis 46:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox O.C. (1964) Capitalism as a System. Monthly Review Press, New York, pp. 57

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirutku, K.: 2000, ‹Influence of Motivational Profile on Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction: A Cultural Exploration’, Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Middle East Technical University, Ankara

  • De Mooij M. (1998) Global Marketing and Advertising. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dose J. J. (1997). Work values: An integrative framework and illustrative application to organizational socialization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 70:219–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Elizur D. (1994) Gender and Work Values: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Social Psychology 134:201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergüder ü., Esmer Y., Kalaycıoğlu E. (1991) Türk Toplumunun Değerleri (Values of Turkis Society). Türk Sanayicileri ve İşadamları Derneği, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather N. T. (1984) Protestant Ethic, Conservatism, and Values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46:1132–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather N. T. (1998) Attitudes Toward High Achievers, Self-esteem and Value Priorities for Australian, American and Canadian Students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29:749–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham A. (1989) The Protestant Work Ethic: The Psychology of Work Beliefs and Values. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham A. (1990) A Content, Correlational and Factor Analytic Study of Seven Questionnaire Measures of the Protestant Work Ethic. Human Relations 43:383–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham A. (1991) The Protestant Work Ethic in Barbados. Journal of Social Psychology 131:29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham A., Bland C. (1983) The Protestant Work Ethic and Conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences 4(2):205–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham A., Bond M., Heaven P., Hilton D. (1993) A Comparison of Protestant Work Ethic Beliefs in Thirteen Nations. Journal of Social Psychology 133:185–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham A., Koritsas E. (1990) The Protestant Work Ethic and Vocational Preference. Journal of Organizational Behavior 11:43–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. and Muhiudeen: 1984, ‚The Protestant Work Ethic in Britain and Malaysia’, Journal of Social Psychology 122, 157–161

  • Gilligan C. (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Henretta J. A.: 1991, The Origins of American Capitalism: Collected Essays (Northeastearn University Press)

  • Hoffman L. W. (1972) Early Childhood Experiences and Women’s Achievement Motives. Journal of Social Issues 28:129–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G. (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, Bosley and Udell: 1985, ‚Renewing the Hunt for the Heffalump: Identifying Potential Entrepreneurs by Personality Characteristics’, Journal of Small Business Management 22, 10–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman H. H., Payaslıoğlu A., Frey F. W. (1958) The Values of Turkish College Youth. Public Opinion Quarterly 22:275–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imamoğlu, E. O. and Z. Karakitapoğlu Aygün: 1999, ‹1970’lerden 1990’lara Değerler: üniversite Düzeyinde Gözlenen Zaman, Kuşak ve Cinsiyet Farklılıkları (Value Preferences From 1970s to 1990s: Cohort, Generation and Gender Differences at a Turkish University)’, Turkish Journal of Psychology, 14(44), 1–22

  • Jones, H. B.: 1997, ‚The Protestant Ethic: Weber’s Model and the Emprical Literature’, Human Relations 50, 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Kağıtçıbaşı, ç. (1977) Modernization and Values in Turkey. Paper Presented at the Panel on “Families and Women: Trends to Modernization and Change” (Eleventh annual meeting of Middle East Studies Association, New York)

  • Kağıtçıbaşı ç. (1986) Status of Women in Turkey: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. International Journal of Middle-East Studies 18(4):485–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakitapoğlu Aygün, Z.: 1996, ‹Contemporary Value Orientations of Adults and University Students’, Master’s Thesis. Middle East Technical University, Ankara

  • Karakitapoğlu Aygün Z., Imamoğlu E. O. (2002) Value Domains of Turkish Adults and University Students. The Journal of Social Psychology 142:333–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakitapoğlu Aygün Z. (2004) Self, Identity, and Emotional Well-being Among Turkish University Students. The Journal of Psychology 138(5):457–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim H. (1977) The Relationship of Protestant Ethic Beliefs and Values of Achievement. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 16:255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau S., Wong A. K. (1992) Value and Sex-role Orientation of Chinese Adolescents. International Journal of Psychology 27:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge G. (1975) The new American Ideology. Alfred Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn R. (1993) Sex Differences in Competitiveness and Valuation of Money in Twenty Countries. Journal of Social Psychology 133:507–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L. C. (1986) The Protestant Ethic Among Taiwanese College Students. Journal of Psychology 120:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer A., Sharp H. (1962) Religious Preference and Worldly Success. American Sociological Review 27:220–227

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland D. (1961) The Achieving Society. D. Van Nostrand Company, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, MacMillan, Yang and Tsai: 1992, ‚Does Culture Endure, or is it Malleable? Issues for Entrepreneurial Economic Development’, Journal of Business Venturing 7, 441–458

  • Mirels H. L., Garrett J. B. (1971) The Protestant Ethic as a Personality Variable. Journal of Counceling and Clinical Psychology 36(1):40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niles F. S. (1994) The Work Ethic in Australia and Sri-Lanka. Journal of Social Psychology 134(1):55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niles F. S. (1999) Toward a cross-cultural understanding of work-related beliefs. Human Relations 52(7):855–867

    Google Scholar 

  • Phalet K., Claeys W. (1993) A Comparative Study of Turkish and Belgian youth. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 24(3):319–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Örücü, E., T. Asunakutlu, and G. Öncü: 2003, ‚Çalışanların İş Değerleri ve Bir Uygulama (Work Values of Employees and a Field Study)’, İktisat, İşletme ve Finans: İnceleme-Araştırma, 3–17

  • Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J. Y., Podsakoff N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88:879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff P., Organ D. (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management 12:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto F., Stallworth L. M., Sidanius J., Siers B. (1997) The Gender Gap in Occupational Role Attainment: A social Dominance Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72:37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray J. J. (1982) The Protestant Ethic in Australia. Journal of Social Psychology 116(1):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos L. L., Roos N. (1971) Managers of Modernization:Organization and Elites in Turkey (1950–1969). Harvard University, Massachutes

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagie A., Elizur D., Koslowsky M. (1996) Work Values: A Theoretical Overview and a Model of Their Effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior 17:503–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargut, A. S.: 2001, Kültürlerarası Farklılaşma ve Yönetim (Cross-cultural Differentiation and Management) (Imge kitabevi, Ankara)

  • Sombart, W.: 1913, The Jews and Modern Capitalism (T.F. Unwin, London)

  • Spence J. (1985) Achievement American Styles: The Rewards and Costs of Individualism. American Psychologist 40:1285–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Super D. E. (1973). The Work Values Inventory. In Zytowski D. G. (Ed.), Contemporary Approaches to Interest Measurement. pp. 189–205 Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang T. L. P. (1989) Effects of Work Ethic and Task Lables on Task Preference. Journal of Psychology 123:429–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang T. L. P., Gilbert P. R. (1995) Attitudes Toward Money as Related to Intrinsic and Extrinsic Job Satisfaction, Stress and Work-Related Attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences 19:327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang T. L. P., Tzeng J. Y. (1992) Demographic Correlates of the Protestant Work Ethic. The Journal of Psychology 126(2):164

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. S. and S. Mueller: 1998, ‚Are Entrepreneurs The Same Across Cultures?’, USASBE Annual National Conference, 15–18 January

  • Tınaz P. (1996) Çalışanların İş Değerleri Konusunda Bir Durum Değerlendirmesi (A Case Study on Work Values of Employees). Amme İdaresi Dergisi 29:43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis H. C. (1995) Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder: Westview

    Google Scholar 

  • Ülgener S. F. (1981) Iktisadi Cozulmenin Ahlak ve Zihniyet Dunyasi, (The Ethos and the Ideology of the Economic Decay). Der Yayınları, Istanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne E. S. (1989). An Instrument to Measure Adherence to the Protestant Ehic and Contemporary Work Values. Journal of Business Ethics 8:793–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M. (1985) Protestan Ahlakı ve Kapitalizm Ruhu, (The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism). Hil Yayın, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentworth D. K., Chell R. M. (1997). American College Students and the Protestant Work Ethic. The Journal of Social Psychology 137(3):284–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, P. A.: 2003, Strategic Entrepeneurship, Financial Times/Pearson Education

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahide Karakitapoğlu Aygün.

Additional information

Zahide Karakitapoğlu Aygu¨n received her Ph.D. in social psychology from Middle East Technical University Turkey. She is currently an assistant professor at Bilkent University, Faculty of Business Administration. Her research interests concern values, commitment and justice.

Mahmut Arslan (BSc, MA, PhD) is an Associate Professor received his graduate degree from Hacettepe University Department of Public Finance. He completed a masters degree in Business Administration at Hacettepe University Department of Business Administration and his PhD in Business at University of Leeds (UK). He has worked as a financial analyst and a research assistant. Dr. Arslan has also worked for the several reorganization projects as analyst and coordinator. He became Assistant Professor in 2000 and Associate Professor in 2003 at Hacettepe University Department of Business Administration. He teaches management and business ethics, organizational behaviour. He is also the director of Hacettepe University Centre for Business and Professional Ethics.

Dr. Col. Salih Gu¨ney is an Associate Professor graduated from Hacettepe University Department of Sociology in Ankara in 1980. He received master's degree in behavioral sciences from the University of Istanbul, Faculty of Management in 1987. He finished his doctoral studies in behavioral sciences at the same university and received his PhD in 1988. He became an associated professor in 1997. He is currently the head of the behavioral sciences branch in the Turkish Military Academy. He teaches behavioral sciences, communication theory, introduction to sociology, and public relations at the Military Academy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karakitapoğlu Aygün, Z., Arslan, M. & Güney, S. Work Values of Turkish and American University Students. J Bus Ethics 80, 205–223 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9413-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9413-5

Keywords

Navigation