This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Data Availability
Not applicable.
References
Donaldson S, Kymlicka W (2011) Zoopolis: a political theory of Animal Rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Groff Z, Ng Y-K (2019) Does suffering dominate enjoyment in the animal kingdom? An update to welfare biology. Biol Philos 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-019-9692-0
Horta O, Teran D (2023) Reducing Wild Animal suffering effectively: why Impracticability and normative objections fail against the most Promising Ways of helping wild animals. Ethics Policy Environ. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2023.2200726
Johannsen K (2020) Wild Animal Ethics. Routledge
Ng Y-K (1995) Towards Welfare Biology: Evolutionary Economics of animal consciousness and suffering. Biol Philos 10(3):255–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00852469
Palmer C (2010) Animal ethics in context. Columbia University Press, New York
Funding
This work is part of the project ‘Principles for Ethical Decision-Making in Environmental Practice’ funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The author confirms that this work is their own.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Not applicable.
Informed Consent
Not applicable.
Statement Regarding Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Katz, T.D. Catia Faria: Animal Ethics in the Wild. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 26, 833–835 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-023-10406-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-023-10406-z