Abstract
A contemporary analytic philosophy approach to science is discussed. It is pointed out that enthusiasm for language studies in philosophy has been recently grossly exaggerated. A role of experimental science as a source of "profound" questions about the essence of the world should be more appreciated. It is shown that the so-called common intuitions fail to capture the gist of current problems in science and can no longer lead us to faithful solutions. For instance, it is not easy to reconcile with common intuitions a vision of the world as a set of latent potential possibilities which show up themselves only under certain conditions. Therefore, dynamic description of the world is proposed to treat both phenomena and various processes among them. In order to achieve this we ought to focus on fates of allegedly fundamental theories and on a strategy of making science. The latter is thoroughly discussed in this article. Furthermore, three types of reductionism are scrutinized and it leads us to the conclusion that our understanding of the world is more likely based on our ability to explain diversified phenomena than on our capacity to reduce them to the ostensibly fundamental models or theories.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Białkowski, G. (1985), The Old and the New Routs of Science. t. 3 Nowdays Physics, (in Polish: Stare i nowe drogi fizyki, t. 3, Fizyka dnia dzisiejszego), Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa.
Feynman, R.P. (1988), QED, The Strange Theory of Light and Matter, Prinston University Press.
Gell-Mann, M. (1994), The Quark and the Jaguar. W. H. Freeman & Comp., New York.
Hacking, I. (1983), Representing and Intervening. Cambridge.
Heisenberg, W. (1979), ‘The notion of a closed theory in contemporary science’, (in Polish: ‘Pojecie teorii zamknietej we współczesnym przyrodoznawstwie’), in: Over Boudaries (in Polish: Ponad granicami), PWN, Warszawa.
Heisenberg, W. (1969), The Part and the Whole, (in German: Der Teil und das Ganze). Munich: Piper.
Heller, M. (1994), Universe at the End of the Century, (in Polish: Wszechświat u schylku stulecia). Znak, Kraków.
Heller, M. (1996), Quantum Mechanics for Philosophers, (in Polish: Mechanika kwantowa dla filozofów). OBI, Kraków.
Lasota, A. (1996), ‘Introduction to discussion: mathematics and philosophy’, (in Polish: ‘Wprowadzenie do dyskusji: Matematyka a filozofia’), in: The Open Science and Its Admirers, (in Polish: Otwarta nauka i jej zwolennicy). OBI, Kraków.
Mukerjee, M. (1996), ‘Explaining everything’, Scientific American. January 1996.
Penrose, R. (1989), The Emperor's New Mind. Oxford University Press.
Prigogine, I.I. (1997), The End of Certainty. The Free Press, New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Singapore.
Przelecki, M. (1995), ‘In defence of the positivist view of science’, in: J. Misiek (ed.) The Problem of Rationality in Science and its Philosophy, Kluwer Academic Publ.
Weinberg, S. (1995), ‘Reductionism redux’, The New York Review. October 5, 1995, pp. 39–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kałuszyńska, E. Reductionism in Contemporary Science; Unity of Nature, Variety of Events. Foundations of Science 3, 133–150 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009646624077
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009646624077