Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter December 27, 2013

Classical American pragmatism: Practicing philosophy as experiencing life

  • Jacquelyn Kegley
From the journal Human Affairs

Abstract

I argue that Classical American Pragmatists—Royce, James, Dewey, Perice, Addams, Du Bois, and Locke subscribed to this view and practiced philosophy by focusing on experience and directing a critical eye to major problems in living. Thus Royce and Dewey explored the nature of genuine community and its role in developing a flourishing individual life but also a public, democratic life. Royce and James engaged in a phenomenological analysis of human experience including religious experience developing a rich understanding of human psychological, social, and religious development. Dewey, Royce and Perice applied the lessons of the scientific communal experience to problem solving in everyday life. Dewey explored life’s aesthetic dimensions. Addams, Du Bois and Locke applied philosophy to problems of living with discrimination as an immigrant or an African American.

[1] Addams, J. (1896). A belated industry. American Journal of Sociology, 1(5), 536–550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/210552Search in Google Scholar

[2] Addams, J. (1902/2002). Democracy and social ethics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Addams, J. (1909/1972). The spirit of youth and the city streets. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Addams, J. (1910/1990). Twenty years of Hull House. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Addams, J. (1912). A new conscience and an ancient evil. Chicago: Dodo Press. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Addams, J. (1916/2002). The long road of woman’s memory. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Baldwin, J. (1991). Nobody knows my name: More notes of a native son. Penguin Twentieth Century Classics. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Du Bois, W.E. B. (1999). The soul of black folks. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Dewey, J. (1957/1965). The public and its problems. New York: Henry Holt & Company and Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ellison, R. (1952). The invisible man. New York: Random House. Search in Google Scholar

[11] James, W. (1890/2000). The stream of thought. In J. J. Stuhr (Ed.). Pragmatism and Classic American Philosophy (pp. 161–181). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[12] James, W. (1971). The essential writings of William James. New York: Harper Torchbooks. Search in Google Scholar

[13] James, W. (1909/1975). The works of William James — The meaning of truth (Vol. 2). In F. Bowers & I. K. Skrupskelis (Eds.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Morrison, T. (1970). The bluest eye. New York: Vintage Books. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Royce, J. (1892). The spirit of modern philosophy. New York: Houghton-Mifflin. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Royce, J. (1895). Self-consciousness, social consciousness, and nature. Philosophical Review, 4, 465–485 and 577–602. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2176152Search in Google Scholar

[17] Royce, J. (1899). The world and the individual. 2 Vols. New York: Macmillan. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Royce, J. (1908/2005). Provincialism. In J. J. McDermott (Ed.). The basic writings of Josiah Royce (Vol. 2). Logic, loyalty, and community. New York: Fordham University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Royce, J. (1913/1962). The problem of Christianity. New York: Macmillan Company; Chicago: Henry Regnery Company. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Royce, J. (1917/2001). Nietzsche. In F. M. Oppenheim (Ed.). Josiah Royce’s late writings (pp. 174–187). Volume I. Bristol, Thoemmes Press. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-12-27
Published in Print: 2014-01-01

© 2014 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 9.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/s13374-014-0210-4/html
Scroll to top button