Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping our Progress: Identifying, Categorizing and Comparing Universities’ Ethics Infrastructures

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethics researchers have scrutinized ethical business problems, which have been demonstrated through the actions of managers at Enron, WorldCom, and Arthur Andersen, among others. In response to these business transgressions, the US government has implemented the Sarbanes–Oxley Act to shore up businesses’ ethics infrastructures. However, universities, too, struggle with ethics problems. These include NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) violations, discrimination issues, sexual harassment, endowment admits, plagiarism, and research funding manipulation. Despite these problems, we have little knowledge regarding universities’ ethics infrastructures and codes of conduct, and insignificant empirical research on academic ethics issues (Kelley & Chang, Journal of Higher Education, under review, 2006; Morgan & Korschgen, College Student Journal, Sept., 2001). This lack of knowledge exists despite the critical role universities play in shaping the moral behavior of future generations (Langlais, The Chronicle of Higher Education, January 13:B11, 2006; Woo, BizEd, May/June:22–27, 2003). In this paper, we conduct exploratory research to identify the elements of universities ethics’ infrastructures. From our research, we develop an understanding of the ethics policies and infrastructure elements in place at a representative group of universities. We compare these infrastructures to those in business as well as across Carnegie Classifications. We then conclude with recommendations for developing university ethics infrastructures and suggestions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AASCU (2006). Ethics Codes. American Association of States Colleges and Universities.” http://www.aascu.org/. Retrieved January 6, 2006.

  • AAUA (2005). Mission statement and professional standards and its importance in retention. College Student Journal.

  • Agle, B. R. and Kelley, P. C. (2003). The road not taken: Creating university ethics infrastructures. In International Association for Business and Society Proceedings.

  • Alsop. (2004). Virtue is in vogue at business schools. College Journal Oct. 28, 1–4.

  • Altman, L. K. and Broad, W. J. (2005). Global trend: More science, more fraud. New York Times, December 20.

  • Anderson, C. (1997). Values-based management, Academy of Management Executive 11(4), 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. and Davies, T. (2000). An ethical decision making model: A necessary tool for community college presidents and boards of trustees, Community College Journal of Research and Practice 24(9), 711–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AOM (2006). Academy of Management revised code of ethics. http://www.aomonline.org/. Retrieved January 9, 2006.

  • Baumgarten, E. (1982). Ethics in the academic profession: A Socratic view, Journal of Higher Education 53(3), 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (1988). Address at the AITEA National Conference, ‘Managerial Vision.’ Harvard Annual Report.

  • Bruhn, J. G., Zajac, G., Al-Kazemi, A. A. and Prescott, Jr. L. D. (2002). Moral positions and academic conduct: Parameters of tolerance for ethics failures, Journal of Higher Education 73(4), 461–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruscas, A. (2003). The lying game: Deceptions shed light on sports’ grey areas. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, February 27, 2003.

  • Callahan, D. (1982). Should there be an academic code of ethics? Journal of Higher Education 53(3), 335–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Counelis, J. S. (1993). Toward empirical studies on university ethics: A new role for institutional research, Journal of Higher Education 64(1), 74–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. S. (1971). That’s interesting! Philosophy of the Social Science 1, 309–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J. (1995). Comments on what theory is not, Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, J. (2003). Why ethics codes don’t work, Financial Analysts Journal 59(6), 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from one case study research. Academy of Management Review 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folse, K. (1991). Ethics and the profession: Graduate student training, Teaching Sociology 19(3), 344–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusilier, M. R., Aby, Jr. C. D., Worley, J. K. and Elliott, S. (1996). Perceived seriousness of business ethics issues, Business and Professional Ethics Journal 15, 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, G. and Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, D. (2002). Scientific misconduct, Academe 88(1), (Jan/Feb).

  • Goonen, N. and Blechman, R. (1999). Higher Education Administration: A Guide to Legal, Ethical, and Practical Issues. Westport, CN: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, G. (1999). Approaches to ethics in international business education, Journal of Teaching in International Business 11(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, P. C. and Chang, P. (2006). A typology of universities ethical infractions: Classifying the types, levels of seriousness, and originating location of ethical failures in university settings. Journal of Higher Education (under review).

  • Kidder, L. (1981). Research Methods in Social Relations, 4th Edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, K. and Auster, C. J. (1999). Faculty conduct: An empirical study of ethical activism, Journal of Higher Education 70(2), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, M. (1997). Increasing effectiveness in teaching ethics to undergraduate business students, Teaching Business Ethics 1(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlais, P. (2006). Ethics for the next generation, The Chronicle of Higher Education January 13, 2006, B11.

  • LeClair, D. T., Clark, R., Ferrell, L., Joseph, G. and LeClair, D. (1999). Ethics in international business education: Perspectives from five business disciplines, Journal of Teaching in International Business 11(1), 43–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. (1987). Useable Knowledge. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom and Cohen, S. (1979). Alternatives to validity – Some thoughts suggested by Campbell guidelines, Knowledge – Creation Diffusion Unitization 8(3), 509–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., Trevino, L. and Butterfield, K. (1996). The influence of collegiate and corporate codes of conduct on ethics-related behavior in the workplace, Business Ethics Quarterly 6(4), 461–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., Trevino, L. and Butterfield, K. (1999). Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments: A qualitative investigation, Journal of Higher Education 70, 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., Trevino, L. and Butterfield, K. (2001a). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research, Ethics and Behavior 11(3), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., Trevino, L. and Butterfield, K. (2001b). Dishonesty in academic environments: The influence of peer reporting requirements, Journal of Higher Education 72(1), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., Trevino, L. and Butterfield, K. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: A replication and extension to modified honor code settings, Research in Higher Education 43(3), 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKerrow, K. (1997). Ethical administration: An oxymoron? Journal of School Leadership 7, 210–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B. and Korschgen, A. (2001). The ethics of faculty behavior: Students’ and professors’ views, College Student Journal, Sept. 2001.

  • NACADA (2006). About National Academic Advising Association. http://www.nacada.ksu.edu/AboutNACADA/index.htm. Retrieved January 9, 2006.

  • Narvan, F. (2003). Seven steps for changing the ethical culture of an organization, Ethics Resource Center, Article ID: 785 http://www.ethics.org/resources/article_detail.cfm?ID=785. Retrieved March 5, 2005.

  • Neukrug, E. S. (1997). A developmental approach to the teaching of ethical decision making, Human Service Education 16(1), 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orzack, L. and Simcoe, A. (1982). Rutgers University Committee on Professions and Public Accountability. The Professions of Ethics: Views and Realities in New Jersey. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, J. (1984). Professional Ethics in Education. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roworth, W. (2002). Professional ethics, day by day, Academe 88(1), 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, L. E., Thompson, F., Hayes, K., Noble, J. and Jacobs, E. (2001). Undergraduate faculty and student perceptions of the ethical climate and its importance in retention. College Student Journal, Dec. 2001.

  • University of Washington (2005). University of Washington: UW Effort Training Workshop: Effort Certification Education. https://courses.washington.edu/fecnon/lesson1/section2.html. Retrieved November 14, 2005.

  • Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory, Academy of Management Review 14(4), 485–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G., Trevino, L. and Cochran, P. (1999a). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices, Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 539–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G., Trevino, L. and Cochran, P. (1999b). Corporate ethics practices in the mid-1990’s, Journal of Business Ethics 18, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. (1993). Institutionalizing ethics into business organizations: A model and research agenda, Business Ethics Quarterly 3, 419–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, C. (1995). The ABC’s of business ethics: Definitions, philosophies, and implementation, IM 22–27. January–February.

  • Woo, C. Y. (2003). Personally responsible, BizEd May/June 2003, 22–27.

  • Zinn, L. (1993). Do the right thing: Ethical decision making in professional and business practice, Adult Learning 5(2), 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business Administration Program, University of Washington, Bothell, Bothell, WA, 98011, USA

    Patricia C. Kelley

  2. David Berg Center for Ethics and Leadership Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA

    Bradley R. Agle

  3. Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, 98034, USA

    Jason DeMott

Authors
  1. Patricia C. Kelley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bradley R. Agle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jason DeMott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley R. Agle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelley, P.C., Agle, B.R. & DeMott, J. Mapping our Progress: Identifying, Categorizing and Comparing Universities’ Ethics Infrastructures. J Acad Ethics 3, 205–229 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-006-9014-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-006-9014-4

Key words

Search

Navigation