Abstract
Competence has recently been proposed as an explanation for the degree of ambiguity aversion. Using general knowledge questions we presented subjects with simple lotteries in which they could bet on an event and against the same event. We show that the sum of certainty equivalents for both bets depends on the judged knowledge of the class of events. We also elicited the decision weights for events and complementary events. We found a similar effect of knowledge on the sum of decision weights.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Camerer, C. and Weber, M.: 1992, ‘Recent Developments in Modelling Preferences: Uncertainty and Ambiguity’,Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 325–370.
Ellsberg, D.: 1961, ‘Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms’,Quarterly Journal of Economics 75, 643–669.
Frisch, D. and Baron, J.: 1988, ‘Ambiguity and Rationality’,Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1, 149–157.
Heath, C. and Tversky, A.: 1991, ‘Preference and Belief: Ambiguity and Competence in Choice under Uncertainty’,Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4, 5–28.
Keppe, H.J. and Weber, M.: 1993, ‘Kompetenzeffekte in experimentellen Märkten’,Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Special Issue 31, Bühler, W., Hax, H. and Schmidt, R. (Eds.), 195–225.
Mangelsdorff, L. and Weber, M.: 1994, ‘Testing Choquet Expected Utility’,Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 25, 437–457.
Savage, L.J.: 1954,The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley, New York.
Schmeidler, D.: 1989, ‘Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity’,Econometrica 57, 571–587.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: 1992, ‘Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty’,Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 297–323.
von Winterfeldt, D. and Edwards, W.: 1986,Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keppe, HJ., Weber, M. Judged knowledge and ambiguity aversion. Theor Decis 39, 51–77 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078869
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078869