Skip to main content
Log in

Judged knowledge and ambiguity aversion

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Competence has recently been proposed as an explanation for the degree of ambiguity aversion. Using general knowledge questions we presented subjects with simple lotteries in which they could bet on an event and against the same event. We show that the sum of certainty equivalents for both bets depends on the judged knowledge of the class of events. We also elicited the decision weights for events and complementary events. We found a similar effect of knowledge on the sum of decision weights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Camerer, C. and Weber, M.: 1992, ‘Recent Developments in Modelling Preferences: Uncertainty and Ambiguity’,Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 325–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D.: 1961, ‘Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms’,Quarterly Journal of Economics 75, 643–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, D. and Baron, J.: 1988, ‘Ambiguity and Rationality’,Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1, 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C. and Tversky, A.: 1991, ‘Preference and Belief: Ambiguity and Competence in Choice under Uncertainty’,Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4, 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppe, H.J. and Weber, M.: 1993, ‘Kompetenzeffekte in experimentellen Märkten’,Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Special Issue 31, Bühler, W., Hax, H. and Schmidt, R. (Eds.), 195–225.

  • Mangelsdorff, L. and Weber, M.: 1994, ‘Testing Choquet Expected Utility’,Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 25, 437–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J.: 1954,The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D.: 1989, ‘Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity’,Econometrica 57, 571–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: 1992, ‘Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty’,Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 297–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Winterfeldt, D. and Edwards, W.: 1986,Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keppe, HJ., Weber, M. Judged knowledge and ambiguity aversion. Theor Decis 39, 51–77 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078869

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078869

Key words

Navigation