Skip to main content
Log in

Nicolette Priaulx, The Harm Paradox: Tort Law and the Unwanted Child in an Era of Choice

Routledge-Cavendish, Oxford, 2007, 224 pp, Price £25.99 (PB), ISBN 9781844721085

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital [2003] UKHL 52.

  2. Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust [2002] QB 266.

  3. McFarlane v Tayside Health Board [2000] 2 AC 59.

  4. Chester v Afshar [2004] UKHL 41.

References

  • Keren-Paz, Tsachi. 2007a. Compensating injury to autonomy: Normative evaluation, recent developments and future tendencies. Colman Law Review 22: 187–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keren-Paz, Tsachi. 2007b. Torts, egalitarianism and distributive justice. Aldershot: Ashgate.

  • Lord Goff of Chieveley, and Gareth Jones. 2002. The law of restitution, 6th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

  • McGregor, Harvey. 2003. McGregor on damages, 17th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsachi Keren-Paz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keren-Paz, T. Nicolette Priaulx, The Harm Paradox: Tort Law and the Unwanted Child in an Era of Choice . Fem Leg Stud 16, 269–272 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-008-9094-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-008-9094-1

Navigation