Abstract
This chapter is about a dark side of Servant Leadership in the context of religious and other normative organizations. The metaphor the leader as servant can become a tool for the abuse of power. Since the concept of Servant Leadership is rooted in the Judeo-Christian worldview, it is quite popular within churches and Christian organizations. I present eight mechanisms by which the metaphors serving/servant can be abused by leaders: (1) serving a transcendent goal, (2) increasing commitment, (3) the principle of reciprocity, (4) creating dependency, (5) pretending to be powerless, (6) servant leaders as saints, (7) infantilization of the followers, and (8) servant leaders as martyrs. Six of these mechanisms can be applied for good and for bad. The misuse can be found both on the personal level and on the institutional level. My conclusion is that we should aim for Servant Leadership but also be aware of the potential for abuse. And leaders should never call themselves “servant leaders” any more than truly humble persons would call themselves “humble”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The title was inspired by The dark side of Transformational Leadership (Tourish 2013).
- 2.
- 3.
Johnson (2018, p. 254) lists four cautions about Servant Leadership in general: (1) seems unrealistic, (2) may not work in every context, (3) poses the danger of serving the wrong cause or offering unwise service, and (4) the term servant carries a negative connotation.
- 4.
For instance four recent PhD dissertations in four different disciplines, submitted in four different countries on three continents: Kgatle (2016) in New Testament, South Africa; Detje (2017) in Practical Theology, Germany, Nuijten (2009) in Management Sciences, the Netherlands, Lemoine (2015) in Organizational Behavior, USA.
- 5.
- 6.
Since the following four quotations were translated by myself, I provide the German original quotes: “Macht als Dienst gelebt, verführt individuell und kollektiv leicht zur Heuchelei” (Josuttis 1993, p. 132).
- 7.
Original: “Verschleierung des Hierachiemodelles als Dienstmodell” (Breitenbach 1994, p. 313).
- 8.
Original: “Das unerkannte Paradoxon: Es ist ein Dienen, das doch ein heimliches Herrschen ist” (Eickhoff 1999, p. 38).
- 9.
Original: “der als Dienst getarnten Macht” (Detje 2017, p. 337).
- 10.
A quote from the US psychologists Cloud and Townsend (Detje 2017, p. 338).
- 11.
Original: “Es gab sehr viel Unselbstständige, man könnte sagen, ihr Wort war Gesetz” (YYY 2007).
- 12.
Original: “Die Kanzel ist in dieser Hinsicht ein rhetorischer Thron” (Josuttis 1993, p. 134).
- 13.
Original: “Und Du maßest Dir an, ein Urteil darüber zu fällen?” (XXX 2005).
- 14.
For example, Moses disregarded God’s commandment by hitting the rock (Num 20:7–13); David became an adulterer and murderer, which is revealed by the prophet Nathan (2 Sam 12:1–13).
- 15.
In a similar context Blessin and Wick (2017, p. 1) mention the “infantilizational feature” within charismatic/transforming/visionary leadership concepts.
- 16.
Original: “Die evangelischen Gemeinden in volkskirchlicher wie in freikirchlicher Form werden bei uns leider geführt, als seien sie geistliche Behindertenanstalten” (Eickhoff 1999, p. 39).
- 17.
For example, Acts 20:28ff, 1 Peter 5:2, Judas 12.
- 18.
Greenleaf (1977, pp. 49–90) had a full chapter on “The Institution as Servant”.
- 19.
According to Northouse (2017, p. 230) the authors Wong and Davey, Dennis and Bocarnea, van Dierendonck and Nuijten list humility as a key characteristic of Servant Leadership.
References
Alvesson, M 2011, ‘Leader as saints: leadership through moral peak performance’, in M Alvesson & A Spicer (eds), Metaphors we lead by: understanding leadership in the real world, Routledge, London, pp. 51–75.
Alvesson, M & Spicer, A (eds.) 2011, Metaphors we lead by: understanding leadership in the real world, Routledge, London.
Blanchard, K; Hybels, B & Hodges, P 2000, Leadership by the book: Tools to transform your workplace, William Morrow, New York.
Blessin, B & Wick, A 2017, Visionäre Führung, Zusatzdokument Nr. 4 zum Buch Führen und Führen lassen, online, viewed 16. August 2018, http://uvk-lucius.de.
Breitenbach, G 1994, Gemeinde leiten: Eine praktisch-theologische Kybernetik, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.
Catholic Encyclopedia 1913, Servus servorum Dei, online, viewed 15 August 2018, http://catholic.org.
Comte-Sponville, A 2003, A short treatise on the great virtues, Vintage, London.
Detje, M 2017, Servant Leadership: Ansätze zur Führung und Leitung in der Kirchengemeinde im 21. Jahrhundert, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.
Deutsche Evangelische Allianz 2019, Clearing-Stelle der Deutschen Evangelischen Allianz, online, viewed 15 February 2019, http://ead.de.
Eickhoff, K 1999, ‘Vom Geheimnis des Leitens’, in J Knoblauch & H Marquardt (eds), Fit für die Zukunft: Konzepte christlicher Führungskräfte, Brunnen, Gießen, pp. 32–45.
Etzioni, A 1964, Modern organizations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff.
Greenleaf, R 1977, Servant leadership: a journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness, Paulist, New York.
Johnson, C 2018, Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership: casting light or shadow, 6th edn, Sage: Los Angeles.
Josuttis, M 1993, Petrus, die Kirche und die verdammte Macht, Kreuz Verlag, Stuttgart.
Kessler, M & Kessler, V 2017, Die Machtfalle: Machtmenschen – wie man ihnen begegnet, 5th completely revised edition, Brunnen, Gießen.
Kessler, V 2010, ‘Leadership and power’, Koers 75(3), pp. 527–550.
Kgatle, M S 2016, ‘Servant leadership: the path to success’, dissertation PhD in New Testament, University of Pretoria.
Lemoine, G J Jr 2015, ‘Closing the leadership circle: building and testing a contingent theory of servant leadership’, dissertation phd in organizational behavior, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Ng, E 2018, ‘Servant leadership beyond servant and leader: a Buddhist perspective on the theory and practice of servant leadership’, presented at the conference The will to serve: inspiring models of servant leadership and social entrepreneurship, Leuven, 24–26 May 2018.
Northouse, P G 2017, Leadership: theory and practice, 7th edn, Sage, Los Angeles.
Nuijten, I 2009, ‘Servant-leadership: paradox or diamond in the rough? A multidimensional measure and empirical evidence’, doctoral thesis Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
Oakley, L & Kinmond, K 2013, Breaking the silence on spiritual abuse, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Ruth, D 2014, ‘Leader as priest: plucking the fruit of a flawed metaphor’, Leadership 10(2), pp. 174–190.
Stone, AG; Russel, RF & Patterson, K 2004, ‘Transformational versus servant leadership: a difference in leader focus’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 25(4), pp. 349–361.
Tourish, D 2013, The dark side of transformational leadership, Routledge, London.
Watts, G 2013, Scrum: from good to great servant leadership, Inspect & Adapt, Cheltenham.
Winter, M 2017, ‘An analysis of the abuse of power by leaders in Christian organisations: cultural comparisons from Canada, Germany and South Africa’, dissertation MTh in Christian Leadership, University of South Africa, Pretoria.
XXX 2005, Personal letter addressed to Martina Kessler, dated 30 May 2005.
YYY 2007, E-mail sent to Martina Kessler, dated 31 January 2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kessler, V. (2019). The Dark Side of Servant Leadership: Power Abuse via Serving. In: Bouckaert, L., van den Heuvel, S. (eds) Servant Leadership, Social Entrepreneurship and the Will to Serve. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29936-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29936-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29935-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29936-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)