Abstract
Organisational psychological defences protect the self-esteem and moral integrity of the organisational personality even at the expense of sacrificing the morality of actions. This paper analyses the spectrum of defences used by an oil refinery and its parent company during an oil spill incident. A hypothetical model of defences built on Swajkowski’s four responses to accusations of organisational misconduct – refusals, excuses, justifications and concessions – is tested through this case. On the basis of empirical findings it is obvious that defences delay, impede and interrupt the mitigation and recovery actions of incidents. It is not possible to break the defence behaviour of individuals because it is a built-in psychological mechanism in all humans serving a valuable purpose of dosing the pain of injury. However, it is possible to separate individual and organisational behaviour so that automatic organisational procedures mitigate, recover and, ultimately, prevent incidents. The organisational psychological task of crisis management is to mitigate the organisation’s ego defences, recover from its emotional turmoil and prevent further traumas by making its ego stronger and more flexible. The argument of this paper is that in practice organisational defences act as bumpers against becoming too conscious of the gap between the corporate rhetoric and reality, as subconscious breaks against too fast change demands, and as batteries in their preconscious effort to prepare for the change. Organisational refusals act as bumpers, excuses as breaks and justifications as batteries, while concessions imply that a change towards a more responsible corporation is taking place.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. L. Bradford D. E. Garrett (1995) ArticleTitle‘The Effectiveness of Corporate Communicative Responses to Accusations of Unethical Behavior’ Journal of Business Ethics 14 IssueID11 875–892 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00882067
A. D. Brown (1997) ArticleTitle‘Narcissism Identity and Legitimacy’ Academy of Management Review 22 IssueID3 643–686 Occurrence Handle10.2307/259409
A. D. Brown K. Starkey (2000) ArticleTitle‘Organisational Identity and Learning: A Psychodynamic Perspective’ Academy of Management Review 25 IssueID1 102–120 Occurrence Handle10.2307/259265
Cullberg, J.: 1992, Kris och Utveckling – En Psykodynamisk och Social-psykiatrisk Studie, tredje något reviderade upplagan (Natur och Kultur Stockholm) [Crises and Development – A Psycho-dynamic and Social-psychiatric Study, 3rd somewhat revised edition].
R. Board ParticleDe (1978) The Psychodynamics of Organizations Tavistock London
S. P. Feldman (2003) ArticleTitle‘Weak Spots in Business Ethics: A Psycho-Analytic Study of Competition and Memory in Death of a Salesman’ Journal of Business Ethics 44 IssueID4 391–404 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1023619917469
S. Fineman (1996) ArticleTitle‘Emotional Subtexts in Corporate Greening’ Organization Studies 17 IssueID3 479–500
A. Freud (1966) The Writings of Anna Freud Volume II: The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence, Revised Edition International Universities Press Madison CT
L. Hirschhorn D. R. Young (1991) ‘Dealing with the Anxiety of Working: Social Defenses as Coping Strategy’ M. F. R. Kets de Vries (Eds) Organizations on the Couch: Clinical Perspectives on Organisational Behaviour and Change Jossey-Bass San Francisco 215–240
T. Ketola (2004) ArticleTitle‘Eco-psychological Profiling Model: An Oil Company Example’ Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 11 150–166 Occurrence Handle10.1002/csr.63
T. Ketola (2005) Vastuullinen liiketoiminta – sanoista teoiksi Edita Helsinki
M. F. R. Kets de Vries (2001) Struggling with the Demon: Perspectives on Individual and Organizational Irrationality Psychosocial Press Madison Connecticut
M. F. R. Kets de Vries D. Miller (1984) The Neurotic Organization Jossey-Bass San Francisco and London
M. F. R. Kets de Vries D. Miller (1991) ‘Leadership Styles and Organizational Cultures: The Shaping of Neurotic Organizations’ M. F. R. Kets de Vries (Eds) Organizations on the Couch: Clinical Perspectives on Organisational Behaviour and Change Jossey-Bass San Francisco 243–263
G. Mellema (2003) ArticleTitle‘Responsibility Taint, and Ethical Distance in Business Ethics’ Journal of Business Ethics 47 IssueID12 125–132 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026051712266
D. Miller (1993) ArticleTitle‘The Architecture of Simplicity’ Academy of Management Review 18 IssueID1 116–138 Occurrence Handle10.2307/258825
G. Morgan (1986) Images of Organization Sage Newbury Park London and New Delhi
S. Saari (2000) Kuin Salama Kirkkaalta Taivaalta – Kriisit ja Niistä Selviytyminen Otava Helsinki
S. Simola (2003) ArticleTitle‘Ethics of Justice and Care in Corporate Crisis Management’ Journal of Business Ethics 46 IssueID4 351–361 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1025607928196
E. Swajkowski (1992) ArticleTitle‘Accounting for Organizational Misconduct’ Journal of Business Ethics 11 IssueID5/6 401–411 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00870552
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Tarja Ketola is Adjunct Professor of Environmental Management at the Department of Management, Turku School of Economics, Finland. She took her Ph. D. at Imperial College, University of London, and worked as a Lecturer in the Department of Management Studies at Brunel University before returning to Finland. Her research interests include eco-psychological leadership, strategic environmental management and corporate responsibility. She has written books and published articles in many journals, including Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Business Strategy and the Environment, Sustainable Development and Long Range Planning.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ketola, T. Corporate Psychological Defences: An Oil Spill Case. J Bus Ethics 65, 149–161 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-4175-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-4175-4