Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are Plants Rational?

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organisms change their shape and behavior during ontogenesis in response to incentives—what biologists call “phenotypic plasticity” or what is called here more specifically “behavioral plasticity.” Such plasticity is usually in the direction of enhancing welfare or fitness. In light of basic concepts in economics, such behavioral plasticity is nothing but rationality. Such rationality is not limited to organisms with neural systems. It also characterizes brainless organisms such as plants, fungi, and unicellular organisms. The gist of the article is the distinction between rationality and intelligence. Whereas rationality is ubiquitous in all organisms, intelligence varies in degrees depending on division of labor that may involve the evolution of a neural system. This article aims to defend the universality of rationality—the Organismus oeconomicus hypothesis. It argues that neither the notion of bounded rationality of behavioral economics nor Herbert Simon’s “procedural rationality” can ultimately undermine the Organismus oeconomicus hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association (1995) Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns. Report of a task force of the board of scientific affairs. http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/taboos/apa_01.html

  • Ananthakrishnan TN, Whitman D, eds (2005) Insect Phenotypic Plasticity: Diversity of Responses. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal 99: 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin JM (1896) A new factor in evolution. American Naturalist 30: 441–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS (1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom AJ, Chapin FS III, Mooney HA (1985) Resource limitation in plants: An economic analogy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 363–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon RN, Burian RM, eds (1984) Genes, Organisms, Populations: Controversies Over the Units of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callebaut W (1998) Self-organization and optimization: Conflicting or complementary approaches? In: Evolutionary Systems: Biological and Epistemological Perspectives on Selection and Self-Organization (Van de Vijver G, Salthe SN, Delpos M, eds), 79–100. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callebaut W (2007) Simon’s silent revolution. Biological Theory 2: 76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callebaut W, Rasskin-Gutman D, eds (2005) Modularity: Understanding the Development and Evolution of Natural Complex Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C, Loewenstein G, Rabin M, eds (2004) Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassill D (2003) Skew selection: Nature favors a trickle-down distribution of resources in ants. Journal of Bioeconomics 5: 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides L, Tooby J (1994) Beyond intuition and instinct blindness: Toward an evolutionary rigorous cognitive science. Cognition 50: 41–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C ([1880] 1989) The Power of Movement in Plants. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C ([1871] 1998) The Descent of Man. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C ([1859] 2006) The Origin of Species. Variorum edition (Peckham M, ed). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1976) The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1982) The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong G (2005) Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: Patterns of plasticity and the emergence of ecotypes. New Phytologist 166: 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (1995) Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detrain C, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM, eds (1999) Information Processing in Social Insects. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J ([1922] 1957) Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J, Bentley AF (1949) Knowing and the Known. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J, Tufts JH (1908) Ethics. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt TJ, Scheiner SM, eds (2004) Phenotypic Plasticity: Functional and Conceptual Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson RR, Silverberg S, Soete S, eds (1988) Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley SA (2004) The functional ecology of phenotypic plasticity in plants. In: Phenotypic Plasticity: Functional and Conceptual Approaches (DeWitt TJ, Scheiner SM, eds), 151–172. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichinger L, Pachebat JA, Glöckner G, Rajandream MA, Sucgang R, Berriman M, Song J, Olsen R, Szafranski K, Xu Q, Tunggal B, Kummerfeld S, Madera M, Konfortov BA, Rivero F, Bankier AT, Lehmann R, Hamlin N, Davies R, Gaudet P, Fey P, Pilcher K, Chen G, Saunders D, Sodergren E, Davis P, Kerhornou A, Nie X, Hall N, Anjard C, Hemphill L, Bason N, Farbrother P, Desany B, Just E, Morio T, Rost R, Churcher C, Cooper J, Haydock S, van Driessche N, Cronin A, Goodhead I, Muzny D, Mourier T, Pain A, Lu M, Harper D, Lindsay R, Hauser H, James K, Quiles M, Madan Babu M, Saito T, Buchrieser C, Wardroper A, Felder M, Thangavelu M, Johnson D, Knights A, Loulseged H, Mungall K, Oliver K, Price C, Quail MA, Urushihara H, Hernandez J, Rabbinowitsch E, Steffen D, Sanders M, Ma J, Kohara Y, Sharp S, Simmonds M, Spiegler S, Tivey A, Sugano S, White B, Walker D, Woodward J, Winckler T, Tanaka Y, Shaulsky G, Schleicher M, Weinstock G, Rosenthal A, Cox EC, Chisholm RL, Gibbs R, Loomis WF, Platzer M, Kay RR, Williams J, Dear PH, Noegel AA, Barrell B, Kuspa A (2005) The genome of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Nature 435: 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J (2007) Why pigs don’t have wings. London Review of Books 29(20): 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks NR, Mallon EB, Bray HE, Hamilton MJ, Mischler TC (2003) Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: Exemplified by house-hunting ants. Animal Behaviour 65: 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D (2006) Advancing beyond advances in behavioral economics. Journal of Economic Literature 44: 694–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1974) The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1992) Biology, economics, and bioeconomics. In: Universal Economics: Assessing the Achievements of the Economic Approach (Radnitzky G, ed), 55–104. New York: ICUS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G (2005) I think, therefore I err. Social Research 72: 195–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G (2006) Bounded and rational. In: Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science (Stainton RJ, ed), 115–133. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G, Selten R, eds (2001) Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glimcher PW, Dorris MC, Bayer HM (2005) Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice. Games and Economic Behavior 52: 213–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff BL, Shughart WW II, Tollison RD (1997) Batter up! Moral hazard and the effects of the designated hitter rule on hit batsmen. Economic Inquiry 35: 555–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein DG, Gigerenzer G, Hogarth RM, Kacelnik A, Kareev A, Klein G, Martignon L, Payne JW, Schlag KH (2001) Group report: Why and when do simple heuristics work? In: Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox (Gigerenzer G, Selten R, eds), 173–190. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (1977) Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (2002) The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ, Lewontin RC (1979) The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist program. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 205: 581–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin DR (1984) Animal Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin DR (1991) Animal Thinking. Scientific American 265(5): 144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin DR (1992) Animal Minds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith TM, Watson MA (2006) Is evolution necessary for range expansion? Manipulating reproductive timing of a weedy annual transplanted beyond its range. American Naturalist 167: 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime P (1997) Mechanisms of vegetation response to climate change. In: Past and Future Rapid Environmental Changes: The Spatial and Evolutionary Responses of Terrestrial Biota (Huntley B, Cramer W, Morgan AV, Prentice HC, Allen JRM, eds), 195–204. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall BK, Pearson RD, Müller GB, eds (2004) Environment, Development, and Evolution: Towards a Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman LM (2006) Intelligence and rational behaviour in the bottlenosed dolphin. In: Rational Animals? (Hurley S, Nudds M, eds), 439–467. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM (2002) Darwinism in economics: From analogy to ontology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12: 259–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber H, Stuefer JF (1997) Shade-induced changes in the branching pattern of a stoloniferous herb: Functional response or allometric effect? Oecologia 110: 478–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley S, Nudds M, eds (2006) Rational Animals? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1893) The Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacelnik A (2006) Meanings of rationality. In: Rational Animals? (Hurley S, Nudds M, eds), 87–106. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil EL (1993) Neo-classical economics and neo-Darwinism: Clearing the way for historical thinking. In: Economics as Worldly Philosophy (Blackwell R, Chatha J, Nell EJ, eds), 22–72. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil EL (1996) Economic action, naturalism, and purposefulness. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 14: 119–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil EL (1997a) Economics, biology, and naturalism: Three problems concerning the question of individuality. Biology and Philosophy 12: 185–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil EL (1997b) Buridan’s ass, uncertainty, risk, and self-competition: A theory of entrepreneurship. Kyklos 50: 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil EL (2000) Survival of the most foolish of fools: The limits of selection theory. Journal of Bioeconomics 2: 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil EL (2003) The context problematic, behavioral economics and the transactional view: An introduction to “John Dewey and Economic Theory.” Journal of Economic Methodology 10: 107–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil EL (2007) The problem of creativity: Distinguishing technological action and cognitive action. Revue de Philosophie Économique 8: 33–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil EL (2008a) Why natural selection cannot explain rationality. Ms.

  • Khalil EL (2008b) The roadblock of culturalist economics: Douglass North and the retreat of economics. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1045/1/MPRA_paper_1045.pdf

  • Khalil EL (2008c) Moral outrage: A two-moment theory of nationalism, entrepreneurship and other internal motivations. Ms.

  • Khalil EL (2009) Natural selection and rational decision: Two concepts of optimization. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 19: 417–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil EL (2010) The Bayesian fallacy: Distinguishing internal motivations and religious beliefs from other beliefs. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, forthcoming. Doi 10.1016/j.jebo.2010.04.004

  • Khalil EL, Marciano A (2010) The equivalence of neo-Darwinism and Walrasian equilibrium: In defence of Organismus economicus. Biology and Philosophy 25: 229–248. Doi: 10.1007/s10539-009-9172-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps DM (1990) A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa JT (1986) The political economy of swarming in honeybees: Voting-with-the-wings, decision-making costs, and the unanimity rule. Public Choice 51: 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa JT, Wallis A (1988) Socio-economic organization of honeybee colonies: A transaction-cost approach. Journal of Social and Biological Structures 11: 353–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins R, Lewontin R (1985) The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1984) Adaptation. In: Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology: An Anthology (Sober E, ed), 235–251. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llinás RR (2001) I of the Vortex: From Neurons to Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria D (1996) Why markets tolerate mediocre manufacturing. Challenge 39: 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland DJ (1977) Decision making in animals. Nature 269: 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marciano A, Khalil EL (2010) Organomics contra neo-Darwinism. Ms.

  • Marsh B, Kacelnik A (2002) Framing effects and risky decisions in starlings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99: 3352–3355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda R (1987) Animal Evolution in Changing Environments with Special Reference to Abnormal Metamorphosis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1978) Optimization theory in evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9: 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1982) The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi S, Garrison J (2003) Toward a transactional theory of decision making: Creative rationality as functional coordination in context. Journal of Economic Methodology 10: 131–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller GB, Newman SA, eds (2003) Origination of Organizational Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, WinterSG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng Y-K (1996) Complex niches favour rational species. Journal of Theoretical Biology 179: 303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom B (2000) Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (2005) Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orzack SH, Sober E (1994) Optimality models and the test of adaptationism. American Naturalist 143: 361–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orzack SH, Sober E (2001a) Introduction. In: Adaptationism and Optimality (Orzack SH, Sober E, eds), 1–23. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orzack SH, Sober E (2001b) Adaptation, phylogenetic inertia, and the method of controlled comparisons. In: Adaptationism and Optimality (Orzack SH, Sober E, eds), 45–63. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal C (1998) Plasticity, memory and the adaptive landscape of the genotype. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265: 1319–1323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman P (1975) The effects of automobile safety regulation. Journal of Political Economy 83: 677–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (2006) Intelligence and rationality in parrots. In: Rational Animals? (Hurley S, Nudds M, eds), 469–488. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesendorfer W (2006) Behavioral economics comes of age: A review essay on advances in behavioral economics. Journal of Economic Literature 44: 712–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin HC (1994) Darwin Machines and the Nature of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price TD, Qvarnström A, Irwin DE (2003) The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270: 1433–1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raby CR, Alexis DM, Dickinson A, Clayton NS (2007) Planning for the future by western scrub-jays. Nature 445: 919–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raff RA (1996) The Shape of Life: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey G, Bastian ML, van Schaik C (2007) Animal innovation defined and operationalized. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30: 393–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards CL, Bossdorf O, Muth NZ, Gurevitch J, Pigliucci M (2006) Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecology Letters 9: 981–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieskamp J, Busemeyer JR, Mellers BA (2006) Extending the bounds of rationality: Evidence and theories of preferential choice. Journal of Economic Literature 44: 631–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen S (1981) The economics of superstars. American Economic Review 71: 845–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J (2004) Evolution’s Rainbow: Diversity, Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh DM, Washburn DA(2003) Intelligence of Apes and Other Rational Beings. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels R (1998) Evolutionary psychology and the massive modularity hypothesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49: 575–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels R (2000) Massively modular minds: Evolutionary psychology and cognitive architecture. In: Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language, and Meta-cognition (Carruthers P, Chamberlain A, eds), 13–46. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson PA (1938) A note on the pure theory of consumers’ behaviour. Economica 5: 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaap P (2007) Evolution of size and pattern in the social amoebas. BioEssays 29: 635–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M (1998) Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2: 369–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuck-Paim C, Pompilio L, Kacelnik A (2004) State-dependent decisions cause apparent violations of rationality in animal choice. PLoS Biology 2: 2305–2315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1957) Models of Man. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1977) Models of Discovery. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith EA, Winterhalder W (1992) Natural selection and decision-making: Some fundamental principles. In: Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior (Smith EA, Winterhalder B, eds), 25–60. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E (1983) Parsimony in systematics: Philosophical issues. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14: 335–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E (1984) The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E (1996) Evolution and optimality: Feathers, bowling balls, and the thesis of adaptationism. Philosophic Exchange 26: 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E (1998) Three differences between deliberation and evolution. In: Modeling Rationality, Morality, and Evolution (Danielson PA, ed), 408–422. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D (1994) The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In: Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture (Hirschfeld LA, Gelman SA, eds), 39–67. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele EJ, Lindley RA, Blanden RV (1998) Lamarck’s Signature: How Retrogenes Are Changing Darwin’s Natural Selection Paradigm. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens CL (2001) When is it selectively advantageous to have true beliefs? Sandwiching the better-safe-than-sorry argument. Philosophical Studies 105: 161–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich S (1985) Could man be an irrational animal? Synthese 64: 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich S (1990) The Fragmentation of Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudge C (2005) The Secret Life of Trees. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G (1971) The coal tit as a careful shopper. American Naturalist 105: 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G (1994) The Economics of Non-Human Societies. Tucson, AZ: Pallas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen T (1898) Why is economics not an evolutionary science? Quarterly Journal of Economics 12: 373–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeij GJ (2004) Nature: An Economic History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (1989) Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 20: 240–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijesinghe DK, John EA, Hutchings MJ (2005) Does pattern of soil resource heterogeneity determine plant community structure?: An experimental investigation. Journal of Ecology 93: 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS, Sober E (1989) Reviving the superorganism. Journal of Theoretical Biology 136: 337–356.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

    Elias L. Khalil

Authors
  1. Elias L. Khalil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elias L. Khalil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khalil, E.L. Are Plants Rational?. Biol Theory 5, 53–66 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1162/BIOT_a_00022

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/BIOT_a_00022

Keywords

Search

Navigation