Abstract
This article reexamines the disciplinary origins of American political science. In the second half of the nineteenth century, the field was engaged in a project of ideological state-building, relying on the concept of the state to put forward a particular normative vision of the American polity. This professional language of governance was developed partially in response to the democratic pressures of the period and to the growing prominence of socialist ideas, which were excluded from the framework of systematic political knowledge. Drawing upon the example of Daniel De Leon, a political scientist turned Marxist theorist, this article contrasts the disciplinary and radical socialist views of the state developed at the time. It suggests that these coexisting perspectives articulated competing notions of political agency, rights, and citizenship. Bridging the history of American political science with that of Marxism in the United States highlights the contested character of disciplinary knowledge, and the relationship between the concept of the state and its legacy in American political development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adcock, R. (2014) Liberalism and the Emergence of American Political Science: A Transatlantic Tale. New York: Oxford University Press.
Balogh, B. (2009) A Government out of Sight: The Mystery of National Authority in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barrow, C. (2000) The Marx problem in Marxian state theory. Science & Society 64(1): 87–118.
Bartelson, J. (2001) The Critique of the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bederman, G. (1995) Manliness and Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880–1917. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bender, T. (1997) Intellect and Public Life: Essays on the Social History of Academic Intellectuals in the United States. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bentley, A. (1908) The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brown, B. (1951) American Conservatives: The Political Thought of Francis Lieber and John W. Burgess. New York: Columbia University Press.
Buhle, P. (1991) Marxism in the United States: Remapping the History of the American Left. London: Verso.
Burgess, J. (1890) Political Science and Comparative Constitutional Law. Vol. I: Sovereignty and Liberty. New York: Baker and Taylor Company.
Burgess, J. (1895) The ideal of the American Commonwealth. Political Science Quarterly 10(3): 404–425.
Carver, T. (1981) Engels. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carver, T. (1991) Friedrich Engels: His Life and Thought. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Ciepley, D. (2000) Why the state was dropped in the first place: A prequel to Skocpol’s ‘bringing the state back in’. Critical Review 14(2–3): 157–213.
Coleman, S. (1990) Daniel De Leon. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
De Leon, D. (1886) The Conference at Berlin on the West-African question. Political Science Quarterly 1(1): 103–139.
De Leon, D. (1893) State socialism—take warning! The People 3(40). https://www.marxists.org/archive/deleon/pdf/1893/1893_dec31.pdf.
De Leon, D. (1896) Reform or revolution? https://www.marxists.org/archive/deleon/works/1896/960126.htm.
De Leon, D. (1897) State Capitalism. The People 7(22). https://www.marxists.org/archive/deleon/pdf/1897/1897_aug29.pdf.
De Leon, D. (1898) What Means This Strike? https://www.marxists.org/archive/deleon/works/1898/980211.htm.
De Leon, D. (1904) The Burning Question of Trades Unionism. https://www.marxists.org/archive/deleon/pdf/1904/BurnQuest.pdf.
De Leon, D. (1905a) Morgan and the ‘Federalist’. Daily People. https://www.marxists.org/archive/deleon/works/1905/050906.htm.
De Leon, D. (1905b) Socialist Reconstruction of Society. https://www.marxists.org/archive/deleon/works/1905/050710.htm.
De Leon, D. (1913a) Industrial Unionism: Selected Editorials. Mountain View, CA: Socialist Labor Party of America. http://slp.org/pdf/de_leon/ddlother/ind_unionism.pdf.
De Leon, D. (1913b) Capitalism versus Socialism: De Leon-Berry Debate. Mountain View, CA: Socialist Labor Party. https://www.marxists.org/archive/deleon/pdf/1913/capitalismvssocialism.pdf.
Dewey, J. (1915) German Philosophy and Politics. Rahway, NJ: Henry Holt and Co.
Dryzek, J. (2006) Revolutions without enemies: Key transformations in political science. American Political Science Review 100(4): 487–492.
Emerson, B. (2015) The democratic reconstruction of the Hegelian State in American progressive political thought. The Review of Politics 77(4): 545–574.
Engels, F. (1894) Letter to F. Sorge. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1894/letters/94_05_12.htm.
Engels, F. (1978 [1895]) The tactics of Social Democracy. In: R. Tucker (ed.) The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: W.W. Norton.
Engels, F. (1986 [1884]) The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. London: Penguin.
Engels, F. (1990 [1893]) Letter to Friedrich A. Sorge. In: F. Mecklenburg and M. Stassen (eds.) German Essays on Socialism in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Continuum.
Engels, F. (2009 [1887]) The Condition of the Working Class in England. New York: Oxford University Press.
Farr, J. (1993) Political science and the state. In: J. Farr and R. Seidelman (eds.) Discipline and History: Political Science in the United States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Farr, J. (1999) Engels, Dewey, and the reception of Marxism in America. In: M. Steger and T. Carver (eds.) Engels After Marx. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Farr, J. (2003) Political science. In: T. Porter and D. Ross (eds.) The Cambridge History of Science: The Modern Social Sciences, Vol. VII. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Farr, J. (2007) The historical science(s) of politics: The principles, association, and fate of an American discipline. In: R. Adcock, M. Bevir and S. Stimson (eds.) Modern Political Science: Anglo-American Exchanges Since 1880. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Farr, J. and Ball, T. (2015) The Manifesto in political theory: Anglophone translations and liberal receptions. In: T. Carver and J. Farr (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to The Communist Manifesto. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fine, J. and Tichenor, D. (2009) A movement wrestling: American labor’s enduring struggle with immigration, 1866–2007. Studies in American Political Development 23(1): 84–113.
Foner, P. (1955) History of the Labor Movement in the United States, Vol. II. New York: International Publishers.
Freidel, F. (1947) Francis Lieber: Nineteenth Century Liberal. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Fries, S. (1973) Staatstheorie and the new American science of politics. Journal of the History of Ideas 34(3): 391–404.
Goodnow, F. (1904) The work of the American Political Science Association. Proceedings of the American Political Science Association, Vol. 1: 35–46.
Gourevitch, A. (2014) From Slavery to the Cooperative Commonwealth: Labor and Republican Liberty in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gronlund, L. (1884) The Cooperative Commonwealth: An Exposition of Modern Socialism. Boston: Lee and Shepard Publishers.
Gunnell, J. (1991) In search of the state: Political science as an emerging discipline in the U.S. In: P. Wagner, B. Wittrock and R. Whitley (eds.) Discourses on Society: The Shaping of the Social Science Disciplines. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gunnell, J. (1995) The declination of the ‘state’ and the origins of American pluralism. In: J. Farr, J. Dryzek, and S. Leonard (eds.) Political Science in History: Research Programs and Political Traditions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gunton, G. (1889) The economic basis of socialism. Political Science Quarterly 4(4): 563–591.
Hattam, V. (1993) Labor Visions and State Power: The Origins of Business Unionism in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Herbst, J. (1965) The German Historical School in American Scholarship. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Herreshoff, D. (1967) American Disciples of Marx: From the Age of Jackson to the Progressive Era. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Jacobs, L. and King, D. (eds.) (2009) The Unsustainable American State. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jessop, B. (1990) State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Keil, H. (2001) German working-class radicalism after the civil war. In: F. Trommler and E. Shore (eds.) The German-American Encounter: Conflict and Cooperation Between Two Cultures, 1800–2000. New York: Berghahn Books.
King, D. (2005) The Liberty of Strangers: Making the American Nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
King, D., Lieberman, R., Ritter, G. and Whitehead, L. (eds.) (2009) Democratization in America: A Comparative-Historical Analysis. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kloppenberg, J. (1986) Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870–1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lause, M. (1992) The American radicals and organized Marxism: The initial experience, 1869–1874. Labor History 33(1): 55–80.
Leonard, S. (1995) The pedagogical purposes of a political science. In: J. Farr, J. Dryzek and S. Leonard (eds.) Political Science in History: Research Programs and Political Traditions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lieber, F. (1841) Essays on Property and Labour. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Lieber, F. (1882 [1871]) Letter to Franz von Holtzendorff. In: T. Perry (ed.) The Life and Letters of Francis Lieber. Boston: James R. Osgood and Co.
Lieber, F. (1911 [1839]) Manual of Political Ethics Vol. I. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.
Lieber, F. (1993 [1858]) History and political science, necessary studies in free countries. In: J. Farr and R. Seidelman (eds.) Discipline and History: Political Science in the United States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Lloyd, B. (1997) Left Out: Pragmatism, Exceptionalism, and the Poverty of American Marxism, 1890–1922. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Loewenberg, B. (1955) John William Burgess, the scientific method, and the Hegelian philosophy of history. The Mississippi Valley Historical Review 42(3): 490–509.
Lowi, T. (1993) The state in political science: How we become what we study. In: J. Farr and R. Seidelman (eds.) Discipline and History: Political Science in the United States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Mack, C. and Lesesne, H. (eds.) (2005) Francis Lieber and the Culture of the Mind. Columbia, SC: The University of South Carolina Press.
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1978 [1882]) Manifesto of the communist party: Preface to the Russian edition of 1882. In: R. Tucker (ed.) The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: W.W. Norton.
McClay, W. (1993) John W. Burgess & the search for cohesion in American political thought. Polity 26(1): 51–73.
Merriam, C. (1920) American Political Ideas: Studies in the Development of American Political Thought 1865–1917. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Messer-Kruse, T. (1998) The Yankee International: Marxism and the American Reform Tradition, 1848–1876. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
Musto, M. (ed.) (2014) Workers Unite! The International 150 Years Later. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Oren, I. (2003) Our Enemies and US: America’s Rivalries and the Making of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Orren, K. (1991) Belated Feudalism: Labor, the Law, and Liberal Development in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Orren, K. and Skowronek, S. (2004) The Search for American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Osgood, H. (1886) Scientific socialism. Political Science Quarterly 1(4): 560–594.
Pittenger, M. (1993) American Socialists and Evolutionary Thought, 1870–1920. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Rodgers, D. (1998) Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Ross, D. (1977–78) Socialism and American liberalism: Academic social thought in the 1880s. Perspectives in American History 11: 7–79.
Ross, D. (1991) The Origins of American Social Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Seidelman, R. (2015) Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis, 1884–1984 (2nd ed.). Albany: SUNY Press.
Seretan, L. (1979) Daniel DeLeon: The Odyssey of an American Marxist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Simkhovitch, V. (1908) Marxism versus socialism I. Political Science Quarterly 23(2): 193–219.
Skowronek, S. (1982) Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, M. (1886) Introduction: The domain of political science. Political Science Quarterly 1(1): 1–8.
Smith, R. (1999) Civic Ideals: Competing Visions of Citizenship in US History. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Stears, M. (2002) Progressives, Pluralists, and the Problems of the State: Ideologies of Reform in the United States and Britain, 1909–1926. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stevenson, J. (1980) Daniel de Leon and European socialism, 1890–1914. Science & Society 44(2): 199–223.
Woolsey, T. (1880) Communism and Socialism in their History and Thought. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Woolsey, T. (1889 [1877]) Political Science or the State Theoretically and Practically Considered, Vol. I. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank Terrell Carver and two anonymous reviewers for Contemporary Political Theory. He also wishes to thank Jeffrey C. Isaac, James Farr, John G. Gunnell, Ira Katznelson, Simon Stacey, Laura C. Bucci, Samuel F. Müller, Brendon Westler, as well as his colleagues in the Department of Political Science at the Indiana University and the participants in the Graduate Student Conference in Political Theory at Northwestern University, all of whom provided constructive comments that helped to improve previous drafts of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khachaturian, R. Statist political science and American Marxism: A historical encounter. Contemp Polit Theory 17, 28–48 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-016-0079-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-016-0079-6