Abstract
Treatment decisions for severely compromised neonates raise important questions about what lives should be saved, at what social and economic cost, and whether there are certain lives that are not worth living. Deliberation on these issues can be framed from the perspective of an individual involved in the care (micro-ethics), a religious or cultural community that would provide guidance for such an individual (inter-ethics), or from a broader social or policy perspective (macro-ethics). The resolutions given at these diverse levels can be in tension with one another, and each by itself is incomplete. Values of parents, culture, religion, and society may compete, and each level (micro-, inter- and macro-) may weight these values differently. In modern societies there are also pressures to discount more traditional religious or family values in favor of social or medical values that influence the current configurations of healthcare. Often the tension between these value systems is not even appreciated by the health care workers who make treatment decisions. In the face of these complex realities of medical decision-making, questions need to be asked about who should make decisions and how they should be made. Should treatment decisions on behalf of neonates be made by parents, family, physician, a cultural or religious group, or society? And what ethical frameworks can be used to guide deliberation?
Thanks to Renzong Qui for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this essay. There are two prominent ways of interpreting the contrast between the sanctity-of-life and quality-of-life ethic. The contrast can be seen as a variant of the one between a deontological and utilitarian ethic (Reich, 1978). Deontic constraints on action (e.g., regarding the taking of life, treating a person as means, and violating autonomy) are associated with the sanctity-oflife ethic, while the maximization of some hedon unit (e.g., satisfaction of preferences) or QUALYs are associated with the quality-of-life ethic. Grisez and Boyle (1979) provide a strong philosophical formulation of the sanctity-of-life position, qua deontological ethic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amundsen, D. (1978). The physician’s obligation to prolong life: a medical duty without classical roots. Hastings Center Report, (August), 23–30.
Barnett, T. (1989). Baby Doe: Nothing to fear but fear itself. Journal of Perinatology, 10(3), 307–311.
Beauchamp, T & Childress, J. (1990). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 3 rd Ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bonnell, J. (1951). Sanctity of life. Theology Today, 9 (May-June), 194–201.
Brody, B. (1988). Life and Death Decision Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Callahan, D. (1970). Abortion: Law, Choice, and Morality. New York: The Macmillan Co.
Childress, J. F. (1982). Who Should Decide? Paternalism and Health Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Duff, R. & Campbell, A. G. M. (1973). Moral and ethical dilemmas in the special-care nursery. New England Journal of Medicine, 289(25), 890–894.
Engelhardt, H. T., Jr. (1996). Foundations of Bioethics, 2“d Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Engelhardt, H. T., Jr. & Khushf, G. (1995). Futile care for the critically ill patient. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 1, 329–333.
Fletcher, J. (1951). Our right to die. Theology Today, 8 (May-July), 202–212.
Fletcher, J. (1954). Morals and Medicine. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fost, N. C. (1996). Futile treatment II: Decision-making in the context of probability and uncertainty. In: A. Goldworth, et al. (Eds.), Ethics and Perinatology (pp. 70–81 ). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grisez, G. & Boyle, J. (1979). Life and Death with Liberty and Justice: A Contribution to the Euthanasia Debate. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.
Halevy, A. & Brody, B. (1996). A multi-institutional collaborative policy on medical futility. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276(7), 571–574.
Halevy, A., Neal, R., & Brody, B. (1996). The low frequency of futility in an adult intensive care unit setting. Archives of Internal Medicine, 156 (Jan 8), 100–104.
Hui, E. (1999). A Confucian ethic of medical futility. In: R. Fan (Ed.), Confucian Bioethics (pp. 127–163 ). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jecker, N. S. & Pagon, R. A. (1995). Futile treatment I: Decision-making in the context of probability and uncertainty. In: A. Goldworth, et al. (Eds.), Ethics and Perinatology (pp. 4869 ). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kass, L. (1991). Death with dignity and the sanctity of life. In: B. Kogan (Ed.), A Time to be Born and a Time to Die: The Ethics of Choice (pp. 117–145 ). Hawthorne: Aldine De Gruyter.
Khushf, G. (2002). Beyond the question of limits. In: H. T. Engelhardt, Jr. & M. Cherry (Eds.), Moral Issues in Limiting Access to Medical Treatment. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Kopelman, L., Irons, T., & Kopelman, A. (1988). Neonatologists judge the “Baby Doe” regulations. New England Journal of Medicine, 318 (11), 677–683
Kopelman, L. & Moskop, J. (1989). Children and Health Care: Moral and Social Issues. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kuhse, H. (1987). The Sanctity-of-Life Doctrine in Medicine: A Critique. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kuhse, H. (1991). Severely disabled infants: sanctity of life or quality of life? Baillieres Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5(3), 743–759.
Kuhse, H. (1995). Quality of life as a decision-making criterion II. In: A. Goldworth, et al. (Eds.), Ethics and Perinatology (pp. 105–119 ). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ramsey, P. (1970). The Patient as Person. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ricoeur, P. ( 1984, 1985, 1988). Time and Narrative, vols. 1–3, K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer (Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reich, W. (1978). Quality of life. In: W. Reich (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics, vol 2. (pp. 829840 ). New York: Free Press.
Schneiderman, L. J. & Jecker, N. S. (1995). Wrong Medicine: Doctors, Patients, and Futile Treatment. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Shils, E. (Ed.) (1968). Life or Death: Ethics and Options. Portland: Reed College Press. Singer, P. (1983). Sanctity of life or quality of life? Pediatrics, 72 (1),128–129.
Singer, P. (1993). Practical Ethics, 2“ d Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wildes, K. (1995). Conserving life and conserving means: Lead us not into temptation. In: K.
Wildes (Ed.), Critical Choices and Critical Care (pp. 105–118). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khushf, G. (2002). The Domain of Parental Discretion in Treatment of Neonates: Beyond the Impasse between a Sanctity-of-Life and Quality-of-Life Ethic. In: Po-Wah, J.T.L. (eds) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the (Im)Possibility of Global Bioethics. Philosophy of Medicine, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1195-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1195-1_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5969-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1195-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive