262
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Formal reconciliatory dialogue based on shift from forward to backward deliberationFootnote

&
Pages 292-309 | Received 17 Mar 2015, Accepted 07 Dec 2015, Published online: 16 Jun 2016
 

Abstract

Desire conflicts arise in several real-world contexts. In this paper, we propose a mixed deliberation dialogue for reconciliation. A mixed deliberation dialogue is defined as a combination of forward and backward deliberation dialogues with respective goals which are subordinate and superordinate desires of a given desire. This research and the introduction of mixed deliberation dialogue have been motivated by Kowalski and Toni's reconciliatory scenario. We show that an instantiation of a mixed deliberation dialogue implements key parts of Kowalski and Toni's reconciliatory solution. We also prove the correctness of mixed deliberation dialogues.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

† This paper is a revised full version of the conference paper (Kido and Cerutti, Citation2014).

1 The authors originally call them positive and negative practical syllogisms, respectively, and the conclusion part of the negative one is .

Additional information

Funding

This research was partially supported by the Telecommunication Advancement Foundation, Japan.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.