Abstract
J. P. Z. Bonilla's methodological approach to truthlikeness is evaluated critically. On a more general level, various senses in which the theory of truthlikeness could be seen as a theory concerned with methodology are distinguished, and it is argued that providing speical sciences with methodological tools is unrealistic as an aim of the theory of verisimilitude. Rather, when developing this theory, one should rest contnet with the more modest aim of conceptual analysis, or of providing explications for the relational concept of being closer to the truth. In addition, some remarks will be made on the difficulties which the similarity approach to truthlikeness has in realizing this aim and which are caused by the important role that Hintikka's constituents have in it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonilla, J. P. Z.: 1992, ‘Truthlikeness Without Truth. A Methodological Approach’, Synthese 93, 343–72.
Hintikka, K. J.: 1973, ‘On the Different Ingredients of an Empirical Theory’, in Suppes, P., Henkin, L., Joja, A, and Moisil, G. C. (eds.): Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 313–22.
Kieseppä, I. A.: 1994, ‘Assessing the Structuralist Theory of Verisimilitude’, in Kuokkanen (1994), (1994), pp. 95–108.
Kuipers, T. A. F.: 1982, ‘Approaching Descriptive and Theoretical Truth’, Erkenntnis 18, 343–78.
Kuipers, T. A. F.: 1984, ‘Approaching the Truth with the Rule of Success’, Philosophia Naturalis 21, 244–53.
Kuipers, T. A. F. (ed.): 1987, What is Closer-to-the-truth? A Parade of Approaches to Truthlikeness, Rodopi, Amsterdam.
Kuipers, T. A. F.: 1992, ‘Naive and Refined Truth Approximation’, Synthese 93, 299–341.
Kuokkanen, M. (ed.): 1994, Idealization VII: Structuralism, Idealization and Approximation, Rodopi, Amsterdam.
Laudan, L.: 1977, Progress and its Problems, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Laudan, L.: 1981, ‘A Confutation of Convergent Realism’, Philosophy of Science 48, 19–49.
Miller, D.: 1975, ‘The Accuracy of Predictions’, Synthese 30, 159–91.
Miller, D.: 1978, ‘The Distance between Constitutents’, Synthese 38, 197–212.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1978, ‘Scientific Progress’, Synthese 45, 427–62.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1982, ‘What Shall We Do with Verisimilitude?’, Philosophy of Science 49, 181–97.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1984, Is Science Progressive? D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1987, Truthlikeness, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Oddie, G.: 1978, ‘Verisimilitude and Distance in Logical Space’, in Niiniluoto, I. and Tuomela, R. (eds.), The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change, Acta Philosophica Fennica 30(2–4), 227–42.
Oddie, G.: 1981, ‘Verisimilitude Reviewed’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32, 237–65.
Oddie, G.: 1982, ‘Cohen on Verisimilitude and Natural Necessity’, Synthese 51, 355–79.
Oddie, G.: 1986, Likeness to Truth, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Popper, K. R.: 1963, Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Popper, K. R.: 1972, Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Rantala, V.: 1987, ‘Constituents’, in R. J. Bogdan (ed.), Jaakko Hintikka, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 43–76.
Robinson, G. S.: 1971, ‘Popper's Verisimilitude’, Analysis 31, 194–96.
Tichý, P.: 1976, ‘Verisimilitude Redefined’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27, 25–42.
Tichý, P.: 1978, ‘Verisimilitude Revisited’, Synthese 38, 175–96.
Weston, T.: 1992, ‘Approximate Truth and Scientific Realism’, Philosophy of Science 59, 53–74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kieseppä, I.A. On the aim of the theory of verisimilitude. Synthese 107, 421–438 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413844
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413844