Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Office-holder vs. office quantifiers

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hintikka, J.,Knowledge and Belief, Cornell, 1962.

  2. Hughes, G.E. &Cresswell, M.J.,An Introduction to Modal Logic, London (Methuen), 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kanger, S., “A note on quantification and modalities,”Theoria 23 (1957), pp. 133–134.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hintikka, J., “Individuals, possible worlds, and epistemic logic,”Nous 1 (1967), pp. 33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hintikka, J.,Models for Modalities, Reidel, 1969.

  6. Castaneda, H.N., “On the logic of self knowledge,”Nous 1 (1967), pp. 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ohio State University, 43210, Columbus, Ohio, USA

    Charles F. Kielkopf

Authors
  1. Charles F. Kielkopf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This work was supported in part, by the Ohio State University Development Fund through its Faculty Summer Fellowship Program.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kielkopf, C.F. Office-holder vs. office quantifiers. Philosophia 2, 321–339 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381592

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381592

Search

Navigation