Skip to main content
Log in

What Difference Does it Make: Three Truth-Values or Two Plus Gaps?

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Blamey, S.: 1986, ‘Partial Logic', in: D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. III, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochvar, D. A.: 1939, ‘Ob odnom tréhznacnom isčislenii i égo priménénii k analiza paradoksov klassičéskogo r¡ assirénnogo funkcional'nogo isv cisléniá (On a 3-Valued Logical Calculus and its Application to the Analysis of Contradictions)',Matématičeskij sbornik 4, 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buszkowski, W.: 1997, ‘Incomplete Information Systems and Kleene 3-Valued Logic', in R. Murawski and J. Pogonowski (eds), Euphony and Logos. Essays in Honour of Maria Steffe-Batóg and Tadeusz Batóg,Vol.57 ofPoznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, M.: 1979, ‘On Łukasiewiczian Logics with Several Designated Values', Logique et Analyse 22, 489–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, K.: 1975, ‘Vagueness, Truth and Logic', Synthese 30, 265–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, R.: 1974, ‘A Non-Classical Logic for Physics', Studia Logica 33, 397–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, R.: 1976, ‘A Pragmatic Approach to the Formalization of Empirical Theories', in M. Przełecki, K. Szaniawski and R. Wójcicki (eds), Formal Methods in the Methodology of Empirical Sciences, Ossolineum, Wrocław, pp. 113–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M.: 1981, ‘Łukasiewicz Logic and the Foundations of Measurement', Studia Logica 40, 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kijania-Placek, K.: 2000, Prawda i konsensus. Logiczne podstawy konsensualnego kryterium prawdy (Truth and Consensus. Logical Basis of the Consensus Criterion of Truth), Dialogikon, Jagiellonian University Press, Krakow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kijania-Placek, K.: 2000a, ‘O pojeciu moÿ zliwości obustronnej u Łukasiewicza (On pure possibility in Łukasiewicz)', in: J. Hartman (ed.), Filozofia i logika. W strone Jana Wol eńskiego (Philosophy and Logic. Jan Woleński's Way), Aureus, Krakow, pp. 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S. C.: 1938, ‘On Notation for Ordinal Numbers', The Journal of Symbolic Logic 3, 150–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S. C.: 1952/1967, Introduction to Metamathematics,2nd edn, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1975, ‘Outline of a Theory of Truth', Journal of Philosophy 72, 690–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łukasiewicz, J.: 1920, ‘On the Notion of Possibility', in McCall (1967), pp. 15–16.

  • Łukasiewicz, J.: 1920a, ‘On Three-Valued Logic', in McCall (1967), pp. 16–18.

  • Łukasiewicz, J.: 1922, ‘On Determinism', in McCall (1967), pp. 19–39.

  • Łukasiewicz, J.: 1930, ‘Philosophical Remarks on Many-Valued Systems of Propositional Logic', in McCall (1967), pp. 40–65.

  • Łukasiewicz, J.: 1953, ‘A System of Modal Logic', The Journal of Computing Systems 1, 111–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. L.: 1970, ‘A Category Solution to the Liar', in R. L. Martin (ed.), The Paradox of the Liar, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. (ed.): 1967, Polish Logic, 1920–1939, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, E. L.: 1921, ‘Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions', in J. v. Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel. A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1967, pp. 264–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, A. N.: 1953, ‘Three-Valued Logic and Future Contingents', Philosophical Quarterly 3, 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N.: 1969, Many-valued Logic, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. S.: 1973, ‘Background to Formalization', in H. Leblanc (ed.), Truth, Syntax and Modality, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 244–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeskin, K. R.: 1974, ‘Some Remarks on Truth and Bivalence', Logique et Analyse 15, 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Słupecki, J.: 1964, ‘Próba intuicyjnej interpretacji logiki trójwartościowej Łukasiewicza. (An Attempt of Intuitive Interpretation of Three-Valued Logic of Łukasiewicz)', in: Roz-prawy logiczne. Ksiega Pamiatkowa ku czci Kazimierza Ajdukiewicza (Logical papers. Festschrift for Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz), PWN, Warsaw, pp. 185–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R. H.: 1970, ‘Indeterminist Time and Truth-Value Gaps', Theoria 3, 264–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, A.: 1973, ‘An Interpretation of Many-Valued Logic',Zeitschrift für Mathemat-ische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 19, 111–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, A.: 1986, ‘Many-Valued Logic', in: D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. III, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 275–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.: 1966, ‘Singular Terms, Truth-Value Gaps, and Free Logic',Journal of Philosophy 68, 481–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.: 1968, ‘Presupposition, Implication, and Self-Reference', Journal of Philosophy 65, 136–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.: 1969, ‘Presuppositions, Supervaluations and Free Logic', in K. Lambert (ed.), The Logical Ways of Doing Things, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 67–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kijania-Placek, K. What Difference Does it Make: Three Truth-Values or Two Plus Gaps?. Erkenntnis 56, 83–98 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014772016276

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014772016276

Navigation