Skip to main content
Log in

Reversing the Stream: Virtue Politics and Moral Economy in Neo-Confucian Korea

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates the Neo-Confucian project of “reverse moral economy,” which aims to restore the ideal congruence between political power and moral virtue, by examining a political debate on the selection of the new Crown Prince and the incumbent ruler’s subsequent abdication that took place in Korea during the formative period of the Chosŏn 朝鮮 dynasty (1392–1910) in light of the so-called “the Mencian trouble,” a compromise between Mencius’ ideal vision of Confucian virtue politics (or moral economy) and his realistic concern with political stability. After discussing how Korean Neo-Confucians were able to justify their choice of a more virtuous candidate in violation of the Lineage Law, which upheld father-son transmission as the constant norm (jing 經), by judiciously balancing (quan 權) between the candidate’s virtue and the incumbent ruler’s recommendation, it articulates the Korean Neo-Confucian project of reverse moral economy from the standpoint of the constitutionality of the new dynasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, Sarah. 2015. Buried Ideas: Legends of Abdication and Ideal Government in Early Chinese Bamboo-Slip Manuscripts. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angle, Stephen C. 2009. Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2012. Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity.

  • Angle, Stephen C., and Justin Tiwald. 2017. Neo-Confucianism: A Philosophical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annals of the Chosŏn Dynasty 朝鮮王朝實錄. Digitally remastered by the National Institute of Korean History. http://sillok.history.go.kr/id/kca_11806002_003 (last accessed on November 1, 2019).

  • Back, Youngsun. 2016. “Confucian Heaven (天 Tian): Moral Economy and Contingency.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8.1: 51–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2018. “Virtue and the Good Life in the Early Confucian Tradition.” Journal of Religious Ethics 46.1: 37–61.

  • Bloom, Irene, trans. 2009. Mencius. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Chen, Ning. 1997. “The Concept of Fate in Mencius.” Philosophy East and West 47.4: 495–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, Tu-hwan 지두환. 1994. A Study on State Rituals during the Early Chosŏn Period 조선전기 의례연구. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.

  • Chow, Kai-wing. 1994. The Rise of Confucian Ritualism in Late Imperial China: Ethics, Classics, and Lineage Discourses. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chŏng, Chae-hun 정재훈. 2006. “King Sejong’s Education of Princes 세종의 왕자교육.” In King Sejong’s State Management 세종의국가경영, edited by Chŏng Yun-chae 정윤재. Seoul: Chisiksanŏpsa 지식산업사.

  • Chung, Chai-sik. 1985. “Chŏng Tojŏn: ‘Architect’ of Yi Dynasty Government and Ideology.” In The Rise of Neo-Confucianism in Korea, edited by Wm. Theodore de Bary and JaHyun K. Haboush. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Chung, Tu-hŭi 정두희. 1994. A Study on the Censorial System during the Chosŏn Period 조선시대의 대간연구. Seoul: Iljogak 일조각.

  • Ch’oe, Sŭng-hŭi 최승희. 1976. A Study on the Remonstrating Office and the Remonstrative Discourse during the Early Chosŏn Period 조선추기 언관언론 연구. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.

  • Ch’oe, Sang-yong 최상용, and Pak Hong-kyu 박홍규. 2007. Chŏng Tojŏn, A Statesman 정치가 정도전. Seoul: Kkach’i 까치.

  • Ch’oe, Yŏn-sik 최연식. 2003. A Political Thought of the Dynastic Founding and Consolidating 창업과 수성의 정치사상. Seoul: Chimmundang 집문당.

  • Ch'oe, Yŏn-sik 최연식. 2015. The Intellectual Genealogy of the Chosŏn Dynasty 조선의 지식계보학. Seoul: Oktang 옥당.

  • De Bary, Wm. Theodore. 1991. The Trouble with Confucianism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan. John B. 2000. The Origins of the Chosŏn Dynasty. Seattle: The University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrey, Patricia B. 1991. Confucianism and Family Rituals in Imperial China: A Social History of Writing about Rites. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • El Amine, Loubna. 2015. Classical Confucian Political Thought: A New Interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eno, Robert. 1990. The Confucian Creation of Heaven: Philosophy and the Defense of Ritual Mastery. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahm, Chaihark. 2001. “Conceptualizing Korean Constitutionalism: Foreign Transplant or Indigenous Tradition?” Journal of Korean Law 1.2: 151–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Hyŏng-cho 한형조. 1996. From Zhu Xi to Chŏng Yagyong: A Study on the Philosophical Paradigm of Chosŏn Confucianism 주희에서 정약용으로: 조선유가의 철학 패러다임 연구. Seoul: Segyesa 세계사.

  • Han, Yŏng-u 한영우. 1997. A Study on ChŏngTojŏn’s Thought 정도전사상의 연구. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.

  • Henderson, John B. 1991. Scripture, Canon, and Commentary: A Comparison of Confucian and Western Exegesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Yi-sŏp 홍이섭. 2004. Sejong the Great 세종대왕. Seoul: Sejongdaewang Kinyŏmsaŏphoe 세종대왕 기념사업회.

  • Hui, Victoria Tin-bor. 2005. War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, Eric L. 2006. “Character, Situationism, and Early Confucianism.” Philosophical Studies 127.1: 37–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ing, Michael D. K. 2017. The Vulnerability of Integrity in Early Confucian Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2000. Confucian Moral Self Cultivation. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2002. “Confucian Self Cultivation and Mengzi’s Notion of Extension.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi, edited by Xiusheng Liu and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett.

  • Kim, Hong-kyŏng 김홍경. 1992. “A Study on Pyŏn Kye-ryang’s Philosophy of Statecraft 변계량의 경세사상 연구.” Studies in Confucian Thought 유교사상연구 4: 161–201.

  • Kim, Sungmoon. 2011. “Confucian Constitutionalism: Mencius and Xunzi on Virtue, Ritual, and Royal Transmission.” Review of Politics 73.3: 371–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2016. “Achieving the Way: Confucian Virtue Politics and the Problem of Dirty Hands.” Philosophy East and West 66.1: 152–176.

  • ______. 2018. “Contingency and Responsibility in Confucian Political Theory.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 44.6: 615–636.

  • Kim, Ton 김돈. 1997. A Study on the Power Relations between the King and the Bureaucrats during the Early Chosŏn Period 조선전기 군신권력관계 연구. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.

  • Kim, Yŏng-su 김영수. 2006. The Politics of State Founding: Revolution and the Transformation of Civilization during the Late Koryŏ and Early Chosŏn Period 건국의 정치: 여말선초 혁명과 문명의 전환. Seoul: Ihaksa 이학사.

  • Koh, Young-jin. 2003. “Neo-Confucianism as Dominant Ideology in Joseon.” Korea Journal 43.4: 59–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Feng. 2006. Landscape and Power in Early China: The Crisis and Fall of the Western Zhou 1045–771 BC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mo, Jongryn. 2003. “The Challenge of Accountability: Implications of the Censorate.” In Confucianism for the Modern World, edited by Daniel A. Bell and Chaibong Hahm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nivison, David. 2002. “Mengzi as Philosopher of History.” In Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations, edited by Alan K. L. Chan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Hong-Kyu. 2006. “King T’aejong as a Statesman: From Power to Authority.” Korea Journal 46.4: 192–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, Yuri. 2009. Envisioning Eternal Empire: Chinese Political Thought of the Warring States Era. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaberg, David. 2010. “The Zhouli as Constitutionalist Text.” In Statecraft and Classical Learning: The Rituals of Zhou in East Asian History, edited by Benjamin A. Elman and Martin Kern. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, James C. 1976. Moral Economy of the Peasant. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setton, Mark. 1997. ChŏngYagyong: Korea’s Challenge to Orthodox Neo-Confucianism. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Jaeyoon. 2009. “The Zhou Li and Constitutionalism: A Southern Song Political Theory.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 36.3: 423–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Edward P. 1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century.” Past and Present 50.1: 76–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwald, Justin. 2008. “A Right of Rebellion in the Mengzi?” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7.3: 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • To, Hyŏn-ch’ŏl 도현철. 1999. A Study on the Political Thought of the Confucian Scholar-Literati during the Late Koryŏ Period 고려말 사대부의 정치사상 연구. Seoul: Ilchogak 일조각.

  • ______. 2005. “The Unfolding of Reform Ideology during the Late Koryŏ and Early Chosŏn Period and the Zhouli 여말선초 개혁사상의 전개와 주례.” In Political Thought and the Zhouli in Premodern Korea 한국중세의 정치사상과 주례, edited by Yonsei Institute of Korean Studies. Seoul: Hye’an 혜안.

  • Vankeerberghen, Griet. 2005. “Choosing Balance: Weighing (Quan 權) as a Metaphor for Action in Early Chinese Texts.” Early China 30: 47–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waley, Arthur. 1989. “Terms.” In The Analects of Confucius, trans. by Arthur Waley. New York: Vintage Books.

  • Williams, Bernard. 2005. In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Han-su 이한수. 2006. The Family and the Family-State under King Sejong’s Reign 세종시대 가와 국가. Seoul: Han’gukhaksuljŏngbo 한국학술정보.

  • Zhu, Xi 朱熹. 1990. The Commentary on the Analects 논어집주, trans. by Sŏng Paek-hyo 성백효. Seoul: Chŏntongmunhwayŏn’guhoe 전통문화연구회.

  • ______. 1991. The Commentary on the Mengzi 맹자집주, trans. by Sŏng Paek-hyo 성백효. Seoul: Chŏntongmunhwayŏn’guhoe 전통문화연구회.

Download references

Acknowledgment

I am grateful to Youngsun Back, David Kim, and Susan Shim for their valuable comments. Thanks are also due to the journal’s anonymous reviewers as well as from my previous submission. This research was supported by the Korean Studies Grant Program of the Academy of Korean Studies (AKS-2019-R02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sungmoon Kim.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S. Reversing the Stream: Virtue Politics and Moral Economy in Neo-Confucian Korea. Dao 19, 69–90 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-019-09704-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-019-09704-0

Keywords

Navigation