Abstract
In this paper I want to argue for the optimal way to characterise the logical and semantical behaviour of the singular term ‘God’ used in religious language. The relevance of this enterprise to logical theory is the main focus as well. Doing this presupposes to outline the two rivaling approaches of well-definition of singular terms: Kripke’s (“rigid designators”) and Hintikka’s (“world-lines”). ‘God’ as a “rigid designator” is purified from all real-life-language-games of identification and only spells out a metaphysical tag, which favours the view of “anything goes”. Instead, ‘God’ as a “world-line,” plus two ways of quantification, is much more flexible to theological traditions, teachings of the church, religious practices and personal feelings. Thus, it provides a sufficiently well-defined singular term for the purposes of logical theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auxier, R. E., & Hahn, L. E. (Eds.). (2006). The library of living philosophers. The philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka (Vol. XXX). Chicago: Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Open Court: La Salle, Illinois.
Dalferth I. (2003). Die Wirklichkeit des Möglichen. Hermeneutische Religionsphilosophie. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck
Hilpinen R. (2006). Jaakko Hintikka on epistemic logic and epistemology. In: Auxier, R.E. (eds) The philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka, pp 783–818. Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago
Kirjavainen H. (2006). Symbol meaning and logical form: A study in the semantics of religious language. In: Hirvonen, V., Holopainen, T.J. and Tuominen, M. (eds) Mind and Modality. Studies in the history of philosophy in honour of Simo Knuuttila, pp 347–369. Leiden, Brill
Kripke S. (1980). Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Phillips D.Z. (1995). Faith after foundationalism: Plantinga – Rorty – Lindbeck – Berger – critiques and alternatives/D. Z. Phillips. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
Phillips D.Z., von der Ruhr M. (eds) (2004). Biblical concepts and our world. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Quine W.V.O. (1961). From a logical point of view, 2nd edn. Harper Torchbooks, New York
Sandu, G. (2006). Hintikka and the fallacies of the new theory of reference. In The philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka (pp. 541–554). Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The whole sketch is based on Jaakko Hintikka’s logical ideas, mainly on his responses to different authors in PJH. I have systematically omitted direct references to his texts because I have modified considerably his ideas for my own purposes.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kirjavainen, H. How is God-talk logically possible? A sketch for an argument on the logic of ‘God’. Int J Philos Relig 64, 75–88 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-008-9164-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-008-9164-y