Skip to main content
Log in

Sergius Bulgakov and his “neo-patristic” lens

  • Published:
Studies in East European Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conception of the neo-patristic, despite its notional meaning being self-evident, continues to confound scholars in its specific detail. In this regard, a question of interest concerns the relationship between Fr. Sergius Bulgakov and neo-patristics. Conventional wisdom posits that Bulgakov ascribed to the “Russian school” with a philosophically-oriented approach to theology, whose interest in patristics was limited. Reading Bulgakov’s writings, however, reveals greater engagement with patristics. The present paper considers Bulgakov’s engagement with the patristic tradition in the émigré journal Put’ in three areas—early ecclesiological writings, dogmatic theology, ecclesiology and ecumenism—and details the nature of his patristic engagement across part of his formative thinking. This has a bearing on his sophiology. It is proposed that Bulgakov actively engaged with the patristic tradition, although his work had a high degree of originality. This afforded Bulgakov a unique “neo-patristic” lens, as compared with theologians of the Russian diaspora in a broader sense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonov, Konstantin, and Natalia Vaganova. 2013. Sofiologia i neopatristicheskiy syntez: Bogoslovskiye itogi filosofskogo razvitiya. Moscow: PSTSU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauerova, Katerzhina. 2021. Sofia i sofiologia segodnya. In S. N. Bulgakov: Pro et contra, eds. Methodius Zenkovsky, Kiril Zenkovsky, Andrei Reznichenko, and Vasiliev Tikhon, 838–846. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo hristianskoy gumanitarnoy akademii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdyaev, Nikolai. 1935. Dukh Velikogo Inkvizitora – po povodu ukaza mitropolita Sergiya osyzhdayuschago bogoslovskiye vzglyadi o. S. Bulgakova. Put’ 49: 72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgakov, Sergei. 1903. Ot marksizma k idealizmu. St. Petersburg: Tovarischestvo “Obschestvennaya Pol’za”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgakov, Sergei. 2003. Dogma and dogmatic theology. In Tradition alive: On the church and the Christian life in our time—readings from the Eastern Church, ed. Michael Plekon, 67–80, Lanham: Sheed & Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgakov, Sergei. 1930a. Evharisticheskiy dogmat. Put’ 20: 3–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgakov, Sergei. 1930b. Evharisticheskiy dogmat (okonchaniye). Put’ 21: 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgakov, Sergei. 1935. Ierarchia i tainstva. Put’ 49: 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgakov, Sergei. 1933. Na putyakh dogmy. Put’ 37: 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgakov, Sergei. 1926. Ocherki ucheniya o tserkvi. Put’ 4: 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgakov, Sergei. 2004. The Lamb of God. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgakov, Sergei. 2008. The comforter. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgakov, Sergei. 1938–1939. Una sancta (Osnovaniye ekumenizma). Put’ 48: 3–14.

  • Bulgakov, Sergei. 1993. Sophia – the wisdom of God. Herndon: Lindisfarne Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florovsky, Georges. 1950. The limits of the church. Ecumenical Review 152–161.

  • Gavrilyuk, Paul. 2014. Georges Florovsky and the Russian religious renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, Tom. 2019. Dominion: How the Christian revolution remade the world. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horujy, Sergey S. 2019. The concept of neo-patristic synthesis at a new stage. Russian Studies in Philosophy 57(1): 17–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochetkov, Georgii. 2003. O granitsah Tzerkvi. V Svyazi s ekklesiologiey o. Sergiya Bulgakova. In S. N. Bulgakov: Religiozno-filosofskiy put’, eds. A. P. Kozyrev. Moscow: Russkiy Put’. https://www.rp-net.ru/book/articles/materialy/bulgakov/kochetkov.php. Accessed 12 April 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubardic, Bogdan. 2011. Orthodox theology of personhood: A critical overview (part 1). The Expository Times 122(11): 521–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Aidan. 1989. Theology in the Russian Diaspora: Church, fathers, Eucharist in Nikolai Afanas’ev, 1893–1966. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Duncan. 2009. Patristics and the postmodern in the theology of John Zizioulas. Pacifica 22: 308–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmemann, Alexander. 1972. Russian theology 1920–1972: An introductory survey. St. Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 16: 172–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, Kallistos. 2012. Orthodox theology today: Trends and tasks. International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church 12(2): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, Leonid. 1925. Novozavetnoye ucheniye o Tsar’stve Bozhiem. In Protokoli seminariya professora protoiereiya S. N. Bulgakova. https://www.rp-net.ru/book/articles/materialy/bulgakov/kochetkov.php. Accessed 10 April 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenkovsky, Methodius, Kiril Zenkovsky, and Andrei Reznichenko. 2021. S. N. Bulgakov: Pro et contra, St. Petersburg. Izdatel’stvo hristianskoy gumanitarnoy akademii.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support for any organization for the submitted work. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. No funding was received for conducting this study. No funds, grants or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Kisliakov.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to declare. Though the article is based on a conference presentation at Krakow Meetings in May 2022, all research is the independent work of the author. The author has no competing interests to declare relevant to the content of this article. The author certifies that there are no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material discussed herein.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kisliakov, D. Sergius Bulgakov and his “neo-patristic” lens. Stud East Eur Thought (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-023-09560-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-023-09560-y

Keywords

Navigation