Skip to main content
Log in

The accountability of hand-drawn maps and rendering practices

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an ethnomethodological analysis of the representation of space in hand-drawn maps. The rendering practice of hand drawn maps includes some systematic devices by which real space is transformed into two-dimensional space on paper and a map is recognized as the map representing a certain space. In other words, members use these devices not only to trace real space but also to enable the recognition of space in a specific mode. The paper deals with three distinctive patterns affording accountability of geographical features: retention of the three-dimensionality of real space; formal resemblance with intertextuality; and identification of space by means of words. Retention of the 3D of space on map is the device that assigns 3D effect to maps and contributes to the perception of the figure as being similar to real space. Intertextuality bestows formal resemblance on various maps to secure the intersubjectivity and scientific objectivity of maps. Words entered on hand-drawn maps enable a reading of a correspondence of maps with real space. The representation of space makes sense by virtue of these devices that accomplish the recognizability of space between the drawers and readers of hand-drawn maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1985a). Discipline and the material form of images: An analysis of scientific visibility, Social Studies of Science. Vol.15, 37-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1985b). Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psathas, G. (1989). Organisational features of direction maps, In Phenomenology and Sociology. Washington, D.C.: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology & University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psathas, G. (1991). The structure of direction-giving in interaction. In D. Boden and D.H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and Social Structure. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1987). The Concept of Mind. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E.A. (1972). Note on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgeinstein, L. (1972). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kitazawa, Y. The accountability of hand-drawn maps and rendering practices. Human Studies 22, 299–314 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005448803455

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005448803455

Keywords

Navigation