Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Issues in Business Ethics ((IBET,volume 31))

  • 1430 Accesses

Abstract

Every fall, my company First Affirmative Financial Network (in collaboration with the non-profit Social Investment Forum) produces a major conference for financial professionals interested in learning more about ‘sustainable and responsible’ or ‘socially responsible investing’ (SRI). The conference is called ‘SRI in the Rockies’ because of this focus, and because it has usually been held somewhere in the Mountain West of North America. For the last several years, the official conference themes have had something to do with ‘sustainability’ - for example, in 2009 the theme was From Crisis to Opportunity: Investing for a Sustainable Economy. Since sustainability as it is usually understood has broadly positive connotations and is generally seen as a good encapsulation of a wide variety of environmental issues, this has seemed like a good thing to most attendees. The SRI industry in general certainly should pay attention to environmental sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, Bendik-Keymer (2006), especially Lecture Two: ‘Moral Attention and Justice’; see also May (1996), especially chapter 5: ‘Social Responsibility’, and in particular, 99-100. For a somewhat more skeptical take on the question, see Dobson (2003).

  2. 2.

    See Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace (2004). See also Benedict XVI (2006).

  3. 3.

    For the online full text of the resolution, see Enbridge (2009)

  4. 4.

    ‘Development’ in this context means economic and social growth: increasing economic activity, to be sure, but also thereby reducing unemployment, poverty, and social inequalities as well. For an early discussion of this definition of ‘development’, see Seers (1969).

  5. 5.

    Notice the resemblance between this formulation and the ‘Lockean Proviso’: the requirement that we leave ‘as much and as good’ available for others, if our appropriation of property is to be justifiable. See John Locke (1689/1924: 128).

  6. 6.

    There are, of course, many different variations on these themes; R. Kerry Turner, for example, identifies four main forms of sustainability existing in a spectrum from weakest (total substitutability) to strongest (no substitutability at all). I will speak only of a ‘very weak’ and a ‘fairly strong’ version, trying to avoid attacking straw men. See Turner (1993).

  7. 7.

    This quotation is close to the end of the book (p. 49, though the pages are unnumbered).

  8. 8.

    For more on the implications of The Lorax for environmental philosophy, see Klaassen and Klaassen (forthcoming).

  9. 9.

    For an interesting recent take on the concept of social capital, see Lewandowski and Streich (2007).

  10. 10.

    See, for example, Eilperin (2006); see also Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (2004).

  11. 11.

    For more on the Rosetta Disk, see http://www.rosettaproject.org

  12. 12.

    Because I am an Investment Advisory Representative of First Affirmative Financial Network, LLC, an SEC-regulated Registered Investment Advisory firm, I must make the following legal disclaimers: I do not own any of the securities mentioned in this article. Nothing in this article should be interpreted as investment advice, or as an offer to buy or sell securities. Any performance figures contained herein are based on information sources believed to be reliable, and are not to be interpreted as a guarantee of future results. The views expressed are my own, and not those of First Affirmative Financial Network, LLC, or of anyone else associated with First Affirmative. Many thanks to Angela Klaassen, Christie Renner, Jeremy Bendik-Keymer, Gary Matthews, Andy Loving, Susan Taylor, the discussants at the Colorado Springs Philosophy Discussion Group, and the editors of this volume, for their extraordinarily helpful comments on earlier versions of this essay.

References

  • Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. 2004. Impacts of a Warming Arctic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendik-Keymer, Jeremy. 2006. The Ecological Life: Discovering Citizenship and a Sense of Humanity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict XVI. 2006. Deus Caritas Est (God Is Love). http://www.vatican.va. Accessed January 2010.

  • Brand, S. 2010. The clock and library projects. Available at http://www.longnow.org/about Accessed May 2010.

  • Brundtland, Gro Harlem and the World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Herman E. 1990. Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecological Economics 2: 1-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, Andrew. 2003. Social justice and environmental sustainability: Ne’er the twain shall meet? In Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World, eds. Julian, Agyeman, Robert Ballard, and Bob Evans, 83-95. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilperin, Juliet. 2006. Debate on climate shifts to issue of irreparable change. Washington Post, January 29, 2006: A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enbridge 2009. ‘Free prior and informed consent northern gateway project’ Available at http://www.onlineethicalinvestor.org/eidb/wc.dll?eidbproc~reso~8611 Accessed January 2010. Figge, Frank. 2005. Capital substitutability and weak sustainability revisited: The conditions for capital substitution in the presence of risk. Environmental Values 14: 185-201.

  • Green, Stephen. 2009. Promoting a Sustainable Financial System; Speech made to the Hermes Fund Managers and the Corporation of London Conference, 24 November 2009. http://www.hsbc.com/1/PA_1_1_S5/content/assets/newsroom/091124_skg_speech.pdf. Accessed January 2010.

  • King, Jr., Martin Luther. 1963. Letter from Birmingham Jail. Widely available, including online at http://www.stanford.edu/group/King/frequentdocs/birmingham.pdf. Accessed January 2010.

  • Klaassen, Johann A. and Mari-Gretta G. Klaassen. Forthcoming. Speaking for business, speaking for trees: Business and environment in the lorax. In PhiloSeussical Investigations: An Introduction to Philosophy through the World of Dr. Seuss, ed. Jacob M. Held. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo XIII. 1891. Rerum Novarum (On Capital and Labor). http://www.vatican.va. Accessed January 2010.

  • Lewandowski, Joseph and Gregory Streich. 2007. Democratizing social capital: In pursuit of liberal egalitarianism. Journal of Social Philosophy 38: 588-604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. 1689/1924. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Mark Goldie. London: Everyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Larry. 1996. The Socially Responsive Self: Social Theory and Professional Ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, Donella. 1998. Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development: A Report to the Balaton Group. Hartland Four Corners, VT: The Sustainability Institute. Pius XI. 1931. Quadragesimo Anno (On the Reconstruction of the Social Order). http://www.vatican.va. Accessed January 2010.

  • Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. 2004. Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church. Washington, DC: UCSSB Publishing. http://www.vatican.va. Accessed January 2010. Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Seers, Dudley. 1969. The meaning of development. International Development Review 11: 2-6. Seib, Gerald F. In Crisis, an Opportunity for Obama. Wall Street Journal, November 21, 2008:

  • Page A2. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122721278056345271.html. Accessed January 2010. ‘Dr Seuss’ (Theodor Seuss Geisel). 1971. The Lorax. New York, NY: Random House. Turner, R. Kerry. 1993. Sustainability: Principles and practice. In Sustainable Environmental Economics and Management: Principles and Practice, ed. Turner R.K. London: Belhaven.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johann A. Klaassen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klaassen, J.A. (2012). Sustainability and Social Justice. In: Vandekerckhove, W., Leys, J., Alm, K., Scholtens, B., Signori, S., Schäfer, H. (eds) Responsible Investment in Times of Turmoil. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9319-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics