Abstract
Empirical research in the field of legal interpretation shows that, in many cases, analogy argumentation is complex rather than simple. Traditional analytical approaches to analogy argumentation do not explore that complexity. In most cases analogy argumentation is reconstructed as a simple form of argumentation that consists of two premises and a conclusion. This article focuses on the question of how to analyze and evaluate complex analogy argumentation. It is shown how the pragma-dialectical approach provides clues for analyzing complex analogy argumentation and how the criteria for evaluating analogy argumentation can be used to reconstruct these types of complex analogy argumentation in Dutch case law. The critical questions in the argumentation scheme do not only serve as a tool for analyzing arguments justifying analogy argumentation, but are also helpful in analyzing arguments against a specific analogy argumentation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexy, R.: 1978, Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.
F. H. Eemeren Particlevan R. Grootendorst (1992) Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies Hillsdale Erlbaum
F. H. Eemeren Particlevan R. Grootendorst S. Jackson S. Jacobs (1993) Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse The University of Alabama Press Tuscaloose/London
A. Peczenik (1989) On Law and Reason Kluwer Dordrecht/Boston/London
H. J. Plug (2000) In onderlinge samenhang bezien. De pragma-dialectische reconstructie van complexe argumentatie in rechterlijke uitspraken Thela Thesis Amsterdam
N. MacCormick R. S. Summers (Eds) (1991) Interpreting Statutes. A Comparative Study Dartmouth Aldershot
A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (1992) Analysing complex argumentation. The reconstruction of multiple and coordatively compound argumentation in a critical discussion Sic Sat Amsterdam
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kloosterhuis, H. Reconstructing Complex Analogy Argumentation in Judicial Decisions: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Argumentation 19, 471–483 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-0515-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-0515-x