Abstract
The species category is defined as thesmallest historical individual within which there is a parental pattern of ancestry and descent. The use of historical individual in this definition is consistent with the prevailing notion that speciesper se are not involved in processes — they are effects, not effectors. Reproductive isolation distinguishes biparental historical species from their parts, and it provides a basis for understanding the nature of the evidence used to discover historical individuals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold, E. N.: 1981, ‘Estimating Phylogenies at Low Taxonomic Levels’,Zeitschrift für zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 19, 1–35.
Barigozzi, C. (ed.): 1982,Mechanisms of Speciation, Liss, New York.
Coyne, J. A., H. A. Orr, and D. J. Futuyma: 1988, ‘Do We Need a New Species Concept?’Systematic Zoology 37, 190–200.
Cracraft, J.: 1983, ‘Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis’, in R. F. Johnston,Current Ornithology 1, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 159–187.
Cracraft, J.: 1987, ‘Species Concepts and the Ontology of Evolution’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 329–346.
Cracraft, J.: 1989a, ‘Species as Entities of Biological Theory’, in M. Ruse,What the Philosophy of Biology Is — Essays for David Hull, Kluwer, Netherlands, pp. 33–54.
Cracraft, J.: 1989b, ‘Speciation and Its Ontology: The Empirical Consequences of Alternative Species Concepts for Understanding Patterns and Processes of Differentiation’, in D. Otte and J. A. Endler,Speciation and Its Consequences, Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 28–59.
Damuth, J.: 1985, ‘Selection among ‘Species’: A Formulation in Terms of Natural Functional Unit’,Evolution 39, 1132–1146.
Damuth, J. and I. L. Heisler: 1988, ‘Alternative Formulations of Multilevel Selection’,Biology and Philosophy 3, 407–430.
de Queiroz, K. and M. J. Donoghue: 1988, ‘Phylogenetic Systematics and the Species Problem’,Cladistics 4, 317–338.
Dewey, J.: 1910,The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy and Other Essays in Contemporary Thought, Holt, New York.
Donoghue, M. J.: 1985, ‘A Critique of the Biological Species Concept and Recommendations for a Phylogenetic Alternative’,Bryologist 88, 172–181.
Donoghue, M. J., J. A. Doyle, J. Gauthier, A. G. Kluge, and T. Rowe: 1989, ‘The Importance of Fossils in Phylogeny Reconstruction’,Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20, 431–460.
Echelle, A. A.: 1990, ‘Nomenclature and Non-Mendelian (“Clonal”) Vertebrates’,Systematic Zoology 39, 70–78.
Eldredge, N.: 1985,Unfinished Synthesis. Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought, Oxford University Press, New York.
Ereschefsky, M.: 1988, ‘Individuality and Macroevolutionary Theory’,Philosophy of Science Association 1, 216–222.
Ereschefsky, M.: 1989, ‘Where's the Species? Comments on the Phylogenetic Species Concepts’,Biology and Philosophy 4, 89–96.
Ereschefsky, M.: ms. ‘Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution’, submitted.
Frost, D. R. and D. M. Hillis: 1989, ‘Species in Concept and Practice: Herpetological Applications’,Herpetological 46, 87–104.
Frost, D. R. and J. W. Wright: 1988, ‘The Taxonomy of Uniparental Species, with Special Reference to ParthenogeneticCnemidophorus (Squamata: Teiidae)’,Systematic Zoology 37, 200–209.
Futuyma, D. J.: 1987, ‘On the role of Species in Anagenesis’,American Naturalist 130, 465–473.
Gauthier, J., A. G. Kluge, and T. Rowe: 1988, ‘Amniote Phylogeny and the Importance of Fossils’,Cladistics 4, 105–209.
Ghiselin, M. J.: 1974, ‘A Radical Solution to the Species Problem’,Systematic Zoology 23, 536–544.
Ghiselin, M. J.: 1987, ‘Species Concepts, Individuality, and Objectivity’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 127–143.
Ghiselin, M. J.: 1988, ‘The Individuality Thesis, Essences, and Laws of Nature’,Biology and Philosophy 3, 467–474.
Ghiselin, M. J.: 1989, ‘Sex and the Individuality of Species: A Reply to Mishler and Brandon’,Biology and Philosophy 4, 73–76.
Gingerich, P. D.: 1979, ‘The Stratophenetic Approach to Phylogeny Reconstruction in Vertebrate Paleontology’, in J. Cracraft and N. Eldredge,Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 41–77.
Hennig, W.: 1966,Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Chicago.
Hennlg, W.: 1981,Insect Phylogeny, Wiley, New York.
Howard, D. J.: 1988, ‘The Species Problem’,Evolution 42, 1111–1112.
Hull, D. L.: 1964, ‘Consistency and Monophyly’,Systematic Zoology 13, 1–11.
Hull, D. L.: 1978, ‘A Matter of Individuality’,Philosophy of Science 45, 335–360.
Hull, D. L.: 1980, ‘Individuality and Selection’,Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 311–332.
Hull, D. L.: 1987, ‘Genealogical Actors in Ecological Roles’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 168–184.
Jablonski, D.: 1987, ‘Heritability at the Species Level: Analysis of Geographic Ranges of Cretaceous Mollusks’,Science 238, 360–363.
Kawata, M.: 1987, ‘Units and Passages: A View for Evolutionary Biology and Ecology,’Biology and Philosophy 2, 415–434.
Kluge, A. G.: 1969, ‘The Evolution and Geographical Origin of the New WorldHemidactylus mabouia-brookii Complex (Gekkonidae, Sauna)’,Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, No. 138, 1–78.
Kluge, A. G.: 1971, ‘A Quantitative Approach to the Biological Species Concept’,American Philosophical Society Year Book 1971, 329–333.
Kluge, A. G.: 1988, ‘The Characterization of Ontogeny’, in C. J. Humphries,Ontogeny and Systematics, Columbia Univeristy Press, New York, pp. 57–81.
Kluge, A. G.: 1989a, ‘Metacladistics’,Cladistics 5, 291–294.
Kluge, A. G.: 1989b, ‘Parsimony in Vicariance Biogeography: A Quantitative Method and a Greater Antillean Example’,Systematic Zoology 37, 315–328.
Kluge, A. G.: 1989c, ‘A Concern for Evidence and a Phylogenetic Hypothesis of Relationships amongEpicrates (Boidae, Serpentes)’,Systematic Zoology 38, 7–25.
Kluge, A. G.: ms. ‘Species Theories from Aristotle to Cladistics’, in preparation.
Levinton, J.: 1988,Genetics, Paleontology, and Macroevolution, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Lewtonin, R. C.: 1970, ‘The Units of Selection’,Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1, 1–18.
Margalef, R.: 1968,Perspectives in Ecological Theory, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Mayr, E.: 1942,Systematics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press, New York.
Mayr, E.: 1963,Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
McKitrick, M. C. and R. M. Zink: 1988, ‘Species Concepts in Ornithology’,Condor 90, 1–14.
Mishler, B. D.: 1985, ‘The Morphological, Developmental, and Phylogenetic Basis of Species Concepts in Bryophytes’,Bryologist 88, 207–214.
Mishler, B. D. and R. N. Brandon: 1987, ‘Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 397–414.
Mishler, B. D. and R. N. Brandon: 1989, ‘Sex and the Individulity of Species: A Response to Ghiselin’,Biology and Philosophy 4, 77–79.
Mishler, B. D. and M. J. Donoghue: 1982, ‘Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism’,Systematic Zoology 31, 491–503.
Nelson, G.: 1983, ‘Reticulation in Cladograms’, in N. I. Platnick and V. Funk,Advances in Cladistics II, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 105–114.
Nelson, G.: 1989a, ‘Species and Taxa: Systematics and Evolution”, in D. Otte and J. A. Endler,Speciation and Its Consequences, Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 60–84.
Nelson, G.: 1989b, ‘Cladistics and Evolutionary Models’,Cladistics 5, 275–289.
Nelson, G.: and N. I. Platnick: 1981,Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance, Columbia University Press, New York.
Paterson, H. E. H.: 1985, ‘The Recognition Concept of Species’, in E. S. Vrba,Species and Speciation, Transvaal Museum Monograph, No. 4, Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, pp. 21–29.
Patterson, C.: 1988, ‘The Impact of Evolutionary Theories on Systematics,’ in D. L. Hawksworth,Prospects in Systematics. Systematics Association Special Volume, No. 36, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 59–91.
Ridley, M.: 1989, ‘The Cladistic Solution to the Species Problem’,Biology and Philosophy 4, 1–16.
Rieppel, O.: 1986, ‘Species Are Individuals: A Review and Critique of the Argument’,Evolutionary Biology 20, 283–317.
Rosen, D. E.: 1978, ‘Vicariant Patterns and Historical Explanation in Biogeography’,Systematic Zoology 27, 159–188.
Rosen, D. E.: 1979, ‘Fishes from the Uplands and Intermontane Basin of Guatemala: Revisionary Studies and Comparative Geography’,Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 162, 267–376.
Rowe, T.: 1987, ‘Definition and Diagnosis in the Phylogenetic System’,Systematic Zoology 36, 208–211.
Ruse, M.: 1987, ‘Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals, or What?’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38, 225–242.
Russell, M. P. and D. R. Lindberg: 1988, ‘Real and Random Patterns Associated with Molluscan Spatial and Temporal Distributions’,Paleobiology 14, 322–330.
Schoch, R. M.: 1986,Phylogeny Reconstruction in Paleontology, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Simpson, G. G.: 1955,The Major Features of Evolution, Columbia University Press, New York.
Simpson, G. G.: 1961,Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.
Sober, E.: 1984a, ‘Sets, Species, and Evolution: Comments on Philip Kitcher's “Species”,Philosophy of Science 51, 334–341.
Sober, E.: 1984b,The Nature of Selection. Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Stanley, S.: 1975, ‘A Theory of Evolution above the Species Level’,Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 72, 646–650.
Vrba, E. S.: 1980, ‘Evolution, Species and Fossils: How Does Life Evolve?’,South African Journal of Science 76, 61–84.
Vrba, E. S. (ed.): 1985,Species and Speciation, Transvaal Museum Monograph, No. 4, Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.
Wiley, E. O.: 1978, ‘The Evolutionary Species Concept Reconsidered’,Systematic Zoology 27, 17–26.
Wiley, E. O.: 1980, ‘Is the Evolutionary Species Fiction? — A Consideration of Classes, Individuals, and Historical Entities’,Systematic Zoology 29, 76–80.
Wiley, E. O.: 1981a, ‘Convex Groups and Consistent Classifications’,Systematic Botany 6, 346–358.
Wiley, E. O.: 1981b,Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, Wiley, New York.
Williams, G. C.: 1966,Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kluge, A.G. Species as historical individuals. Biol Philos 5, 417–431 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207380
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207380