Abstract
This paper is an attempt to count the proportion of tautologies of some intermediate logics among all formulas. Our interest concentrates especially on Medvedev’s logic and its \(\{\to,\vee,\neg\}\) fragment over language with one propositional variable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dummet M. (1954). A propositional calculus with a denumerable matrix. Journal of Symbolic Logic 24, 96–107
Kostrzycka Z. (2003). On the density of truth in Dummet’s logic. Bulletin of the Section of Logic 32(1/2): 43–55
Kostrzycka Z., Zaionc M. (2004). Statistics of intuitionistic versus classical logics. Studia Logica 76(3): 307–328
Levin L. (1979). Some syntactical theorems on the Yu. T. Medvedev’s calculus of finite problems. Doklady Academii Nauk SSSR (Soviet Mathematics, Doklady) 245, 1051–1054
Moczurad M., Tyszkiewicz J., Zaionc M. (2000). Statistical properties of simple types. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 10, 575–594
Szegö G. (1975). Orthogonal polynomials (4th ed). Providence: AMS, Colloquium Publications, 23.
Wilf, H. S. (1994). Generating functionology (2nd ed). Boston: Academic Press.
Wojtylak P. (2004). On a problem of H. Friedman and its solution by T. Prucnal. Reports on Mathematical Logic 38, 69–86
Zaionc M. (2005). On the asymptotic density of tautologies in logic of implication and negation. Reports on Mathematical Logic 39, 67–87
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kostrzycka, Z. The density of truth in monadic fragments of some intermediate logics. J Log Lang Inf 16, 283–302 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-006-9030-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-006-9030-1