Published June 30, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Anthropology of "Philosophy of Translation": Contemporary Ukrainian Philosophical Dimension

  • 1. Dnipro University of Technology, Ukraine

Description

Purpose. The study is aimed at the "philosophy of translation" methodology outlining as an original philosophical texts translation tool from the point of view of culture as anthropological phenomena, namely, individuals’ participating in the text creation process providing the consistent following tasks solution: a) clarifying the text author’s role, which is the object of recipients’ perception; b) the human psyche inexhaustible potential realization for the primary text semantic content understanding by the translator to prevent its distortion; c) defining the requirements for the translation process as a mean of bringing the reader closer to author’s understanding by language barrier elimination as an intuitive "obstacle" on its way. Theoretical basis. The author proceeds from the factual absence of the "philosophy of translation" concept unambiguous definition in the modern anthropological and philosophical space and seeks to take into account all the factors affecting the newly created text quality due to the all participants’ features reviled on every stage of the text translation process. Today, the "philosophy of translation" is a widely used phrase, though ignoring the characteristics of man as a single meaning creator of the concept under study. The article provisions are based on philosophical, translation, and psychological studies with an emphasis on classical and non-classical anthropology research (Gadamer, Khoma, Holovach, Chepeleva, Dizdar, Leonov, Lotman, Bakhtin, etc.). Originality. The author proposes a methodology for the original philosophical text adaptation and presents a generalized step-by-step scheme for its translation, which helps to solve the personality of the researcher and/or translator’s influence problem on the individual author’s meaning preservation during its reproduction in a reader’s convenient language. Conclusions. A look at the "philosophy of translation" from the philosophical anthropology point of view allows us not only to consider the process of translation from the individual characteristics of all the participants (author/philosopher-reader-researcher/translator-reader-philosopher/reader) but also to describe such translation methodology by concentrating on highlighting the author’s reasoning course, which rises new knowledge and encourages further philosophical reflection within the human nature instability problem. The translation of a philosophical text not only reproduces the semantic structure of the original message but also provides a number of possible dialogical reactions to it as an object of human phenomenology. The proposed concept takes into account any reader’s needs, fully preserving the author’s position.

Files

Anthropology of Philosophy of Translation Contemporary Ukrainian Philosophical Dimension.pdf

Additional details

Related works

Is identical to
Journal article: http://ampr.diit.edu.ua/article/view/260319 (URL)

References

  • Cassin, B., Sihov, K., & Vasylchenko, A. (Eds.). (2011a). Vocabulaire européen des philosophies: Dictionnaire des intraduisibles (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Kyiv: Dukh i Litera. (in Ukrainian)
  • Cassin, B., Sihov, K., & Vasylchenko, A. (Eds.). (2011b). Vocabulaire européen des philosophies: Dictionnaire des intraduisibles (Vol. 2). Kyiv: Dukh i Litera. (in Ukrainian)
  • Cassin, B., Sihov, K., & Vasylchenko, A. (Eds.). (2013). Vocabulaire européen des philosophies: Dictionnaire des intraduisibles (Vol. 3). Kyiv: Dukh i Litera. (in Ukrainian)
  • Cassin, B., Sihov, K., & Vasylchenko, A. (Eds.). (2016). Vocabulaire européen des philosophies: Dictionnaire des intraduisibles (Vol. 4). Kyiv: Dukh i Litera. (in Ukrainian)
  • Chepeleva, N. V. (2015). Tekst i chytach: Posibnyk. Zhytomyr: Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University. (in Ukrainian)
  • Derrida, J. (1985). The Ear of the Other (P. Kamuf, Trans.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (in English)
  • Dizdar, D. (2011). Deconstruction. In Y. Gambier & L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies (Vol. 2, pp. 31-36). John Benjamins Publishing Company. (in English)
  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1991). Aktualnost prekrasnogo. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)
  • Husserl, E. (2009). Dosvid i sudzhennia. Doslidzhennia henealohii lohiky (V. Kebuladze, Trans.). Kyiv: PPS-2002. (in Ukrainian)
  • Khoma, O. (Ed.). (2014). "Medytatsii" Dekarta u dzerkali suchasnykh tlumachen: Jean-Marie Beyssade, Jean-Luc Marion, Kim Sang Ong-Van-Cung. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera. (in Ukrainian)
  • Kolesnykova, T., & Matveyeva, O. (2019). An Analysis of Digital Library Publishing Services in Ukrainian Universities. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(4), 52-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29510 (in English)
  • Kovtun, L., & Shabanova, Y. (2020). Problematic field of "philosophy of translation". Epistemological Studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences, 3(1), 51-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15421/342006 (in Ukrainian)
  • Lederer, M. (2010). Interpretive approach. In Y. Gambier & L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies (Vol. 1, pp. 173-179). John Benjamins Publishing Company. (in English)
  • Leonov, A. (2015). "Argument Zombi" Devida Chalmersa: Perednie slovo perekladacha. Philosophical Thought, (5), 51-59. (in Ukrainian)
  • Naudé, J. A. (2010). Religious translation. In Y. Gambier & L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies (Vol. 1, pp. 285-293). John Benjamins Publishing Company. (in English)
  • Patton, M. F. (n.d.). The Cartoon Introduction to Philosophy: Editions. Goodreads. Retrieved from https://www.goodreads.com/work/editions/41612348-the-cartoon-introduction-to-philosophy
  • Patton, M. F., & Cannon, K. (2015). The Cartoon Introduction to Philosophy. Hill and Wang. (in English)
  • Patton, M., & Cannon, K. (2019). Filosofiia (O. Nehrebetskyi, Trans.). Kyiv: Ridna mova. (in Ukrainian)
  • Plato. (2018). Benket (U. Holovach, Trans., 2nd ed.). Lviv: Ukrainian Catholic University. (in Ukrainian)
  • Porus, V. N. (2016). What Does It Mean to "Understand" a Literary Text? Voprosy Filosofii, (7), 84-96. (in Russian)
  • Shaev, Y. M. (2012). Tekst kak germenevticheskiy fenomen. Retrieved from https://pgu.ru/editions/un_reading/detail.php?SECTION_ID=2987&ELEMENT_ID=13329 (in Russian)
  • Stolze, R. (2010). Hermeneutics and translation. In Y. Gambier & L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies (Vol. 1, pp. 141-146). John Benjamins Publishing Company. (in English)
  • Zhinkin, N. I. (1982). Rech kak provodnik informatsii. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian)