Abstract
Does a τέχνη, qua τέχνη, need to be good-directed? On the basis of the Gorgias, many scholars have thought the answer is yes; I argue here to the contrary. There are, of course, many beneficial τέχναι, such as medicine and weaving; and there are even unconditionally good τέχναι, like the πολιτικὴ τέχνη; but Plato also happily construes piracy as a τέχνη in the Sophist, and, more normally, all sorts of neutral practices as τέχναι (e.g., drama). In order to make this argument, I provide a taxonomy of the different kinds of τέχναι and demonstrate that, across the corpus, there does not seem to be a good-directedness requirement. I then address the evidence of the Gorgias, where most commentators find a connection between τέχνη and good-directedness. I argue that this interpretation is incorrect, and that rhetoric in fact fails to be a τέχνη in the Gorgias solely because it is unable to give a rational account. A close reading of the Gorgias shows that this is a plausible interpretation, and comparison with the Phaedrus reinforces the point: in both dialogues, whether rhetoric will be a τέχνη or not hinges only on the question of rationality, not a good-directedness condition.
Notes
All translations are my own unless otherwise noted. Abbreviations of authors and works are those of the Oxford Classical Dictionary, 4th ed.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Hendrik Lorenz, Jeremy Reid, and Christian Wildberg for incisive comments on earlier drafts of this essay.
References
Baker, S. H. 2015. “The Concept of Ergon: Towards an Achievement Interpretation of Aristotle’s ‘Function Argument’.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XLVIII: 227–66.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735540.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Balansard, A. 2001. Technè dans les Dialogues de Platon: l’empreinte de la sophistique. Sankt Augustin: Academia.Search in Google Scholar
Cooper, J. 1999. “Socrates and Plato in Plato’s Gorgias.” In Reason and Emotion, 29–75. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691223261-005Search in Google Scholar
Coulton, J. J. 1977. Ancient Greek Architects at Work. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1959. Plato: Gorgias. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198144953.book.1Search in Google Scholar
Doyle, J. 2010. “Socrates and Gorgias.” Phronesis 55 (1): 1–25.10.1163/003188610X12589452898769Search in Google Scholar
Franklin, L. 2005. “Technē and Teleology in Plato’s Gorgias.” Apeiron 38 (4): 229–55.10.1515/APEIRON.2005.38.4.229Search in Google Scholar
Hemmenway, S. R. 1999. “The Techne-Analogy in Socrates’ Healthy City: Justice and the Craftsman in the Republic.” Ancient Philosophy 19 (2): 267–84.10.5840/ancientphil199919230Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1977. Plato’s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1979. Plato: Gorgias. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198720911.book.1Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1995. Plato’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195086457.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Jones, R. E., and R. Sharma. 2017. “The Wandering Hero of the Hippias Minor: Socrates on Virtue and Craft.” Classical Philology 112 (2): 113–37. Doi: 10.1086/691563.Search in Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1983. “Drama and Dialectic in Plato’s Gorgias.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy I: 75–121.Search in Google Scholar
Levy, D. 2005. “Technē and the Problem of Socratic Philosophy in the Gorgias.” Apeiron 38 (4): 185–227.10.1515/APEIRON.2005.38.4.185Search in Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pelosi, F. 2017. “Against Musical ἀτεχνία: Papyrus Hibeh I 13 and the Debate on τέχνη in Classical Greece.” Apeiron 50 (3): 393–413.10.1515/apeiron-2015-0076Search in Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. 1974. The Ancient View of Greek Art. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Roochnik, D. 1996. Of Art and Wisdom: Plato’s Understanding of Techne. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, D. 2005. Plato on Pleasure and the Good Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199282846.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2009. “Myth, Punishment and Politics in the Gorgias.” In Plato’s Myths, edited by C. Partenie, 51–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sørensen, A. D. 2016. “Scientific Politics and the Power of the People: Rhetoric and Technē in the Gorgias.” In Plato on Democracy and Political Technē, 35–62. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004326194_004Search in Google Scholar
Sprague, R. 1976. Plato’s Philosopher-King: A Study of the Theoretical Background. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Search in Google Scholar
Tiles, J. E. 1984. “Technē and Moral Expertise.” Philosophy 59 (227): 49–66.10.1017/S0031819100056485Search in Google Scholar
Warren, E. 1989. “The Craft Argument: An Analogy?.” In Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy III: Plato, edited by J. Anton and A. Preus, 101–15. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. 1990. “Plato’s Early Theory of Knowledge.” In Epistemology, edited by S. Everson, 60–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Woolf, R. 2004. “Why Is Rhetoric Not a Skill?.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (2): 119–30.Search in Google Scholar
Yunis, H. 2011. Plato: Phaedrus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511977237Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin
