Skip to main content
Log in

Prescriptions: Autonomy, Humanism and the Purpose of Health Technology

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

My purpose is to examine two of the foundations of medical ethics: the principle of autonomy and the concept of the human. I also investigate the extent to which health technology makes autonomy and humanness possible. I begin by underlining Illich's point that the same health technology designed to promote health and autonomy also is pathogenic. I proceed to analyse the Kantian concept of autonomy, a concept which is closely associated with health and which continues to determine current ethical thinking. In so doing, I uncover an unexpected ontological function of health technology, a function described in Heidegger's work on technology. Based on this discovery, I suggest that calls for Kantian autonomy may often be self-defeating or even sometimes harmful. I conclude by calling for continued ethical vigilance, but also for a questioning of the hitherto virtually unquestionable concepts of ethics and humanness which may themselves play a role in our era's greatest problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Jonsen AR, Toulmin S. The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Levine RJ. Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Third Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Engelhardt HT. The Foundations of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cassell EJ. The function of medicine: Restoring autonomy to the patient. Hastings Center Report 1977; 6: 214–222.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Engelhardt HT. Human well-being and medicine: Some basic value-judgments in the biomedical sciences. In: Callahan D, Engelhardt HT, eds., Science, Ethics and Medicine. Hastings-on-Hudson, New York: The Hastings Center, 1976: 120–139.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Illich I. Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health. New York: Bantam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Descartes R. Meditationes De Prima Philosophia. Paris: Vrin, 1978. Translated in: Haldane ES, Ross GRT, eds. The Philosophical Works of Descartes, Vol. 1. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981: 131–200.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kant I. Beantwortung der Frage: Was Ist Aufklärung? In: Werkausgabe, Vol. XII. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1977: 53–61. Transl. Beck LW as What is enlightenment? In: Kant I. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1976: 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kant I. Werkausgabe, Vol. XI. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heidegger M. Brief über den Humanismus. In: Wegmarken. Frankfut/Main: Klostermann, 1978: 311–360. Transl. Letter on Humanism. In: Basic Writings. New York: Harper & Row, 1979: 189–242.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krakauer E. On medicine and politics. The Yale J of Biol Medicine 1992; 3: 243–250.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lifton RJ. The Nazi Doctors. New York: Basic, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Müller-Hill B. Murderous Science. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Proctor RN. Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kevles DJ. In the Name of Eugenics. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jones JH. Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York: Free Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kant I. Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1977. Transl. Gregor M. as The Doctrine of Virtue. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kant I. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. In Werkausgabe Vol. VII. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1977: 9–102. Transl. Beck LW as Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kant I. Anthropologie in pragnatischer Hinsicht. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1977. Transl. Dowdell VL as Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Carbondale: University of Illinois Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Heidegger M. Die Frage nach der Technik. In: Vorträge und Aufsätze. Pfullingen, Germany: Neske, 1978: 9–40. Transl. The Question Concerning Technology. In: The Question Concerning Technology. New York: Harper & Row, 1977: 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Heidegger M. Die Zeit des Weltbildes. In: Holzwege. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann, 1980: 73–110. Transl. The Age of the World Picture. In: The Question Concerning Technology. New York: Harper & Row, 1977: 115–154.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Foucault M. Le retour de la morale. Les Nouvelles 1984 June 28: 16.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Foucault M. Naissance de la clinique. Paris: PUF, 1983. Transl. Sheridan Smith AM as The Birth of the Clinic. New York: Vintage, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Heidegger M. Wissenschaft und Besinnung. In: Vorträge und Aufsätze. Pfullingen, Germany: Neske, 1978: 41–66. Transl. Science and Reflection. In: The Question Concerning Technology. New York: Harper & Row, 1977: 155–182.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kant I. Der Streit der Fakultäten. In Werkausgabe, Vol. XI. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1977: 260–393. Transl. Gregor M as The Conflict of the Faculties. New York: Abaris, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Derrida J. Altérités: Jacques Derrida et Pierre Jean Laberrière. Paris: Osiris, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krakauer, E.L. Prescriptions: Autonomy, Humanism and the Purpose of Health Technology. Theor Med Bioeth 19, 525–545 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009999909072

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009999909072

Navigation